Society without God:Better or worse?, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 1-11-2008 @ 06:39 PM by bruxfain
Originally posted by Lucifer Rising
reply to
post by bruxfain



You know what I enjoy about you? You never really answer to anything. You accuse, assume, and assign. I respond, joyfully answering to every charge and question. You just ignore the same volley back and move on to your next set of irrational arguments that are going nowhere. I would kind of like to know what land your race of elves comes from. I cannot help but believe that will only help this discussion further.



I answered questions. You rejected them. As far as my eyes can see and my mind can understand, I am honest to the best of my ability.

I'm from here, America.

So what is so irrational about this argument...Society without God would be a worse place; or more accurately not a place at all, as it would certainly disintegrate, literally.

I brought up current events illustrating how knowledge is insufficient for Society to survive and that faith and God, are the only reason you are here to be able to have this conversation with me.

Please what is so irrational about this? I would like to hear this answer.

PS. Do you know what psychic terror is?


reply posted on 1-11-2008 @ 06:43 PM by Lucifer Rising
Originally posted by bruxfain
Originally posted by Lucifer Rising
Originally posted by bruxfain


"We have lost control," said Hale, quoting Bernanke. "We cannot stabilize the dollar. We cannot control commodity prices."

Its funny because it is true. This world has been taken from man and most don't even know it yet. But you obviously have the face to explain your point of view despite it failure.




Yes, um those were greedy people discussing how their greed has caused them to fail. What does that have to do with god or science?


Oh, its them now, not, "we as a people". Do you often socialize success and privatize failure? From my point of view they are the same as you. They are Godless and faithless, which explains their greed and their need to control something.

Their knowledge caused this problem their lack of faith nearly led to complete collapse, but something else is supporting this world which is a good sign for us all. Even mortals.



I will try this again and I will type slowly. THEY ARE NOT SCIENTISTS MAKING SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERIES. Lots of people make bad decisions all the time and cause bad things to happen. That has nothing to do with advancing technologically without god.

You are really stretching for this argument. They have nothing to do with the "we" when discussing the advancement of humanity through technology. They are shiesters who controlled money. Where is the link?

What connection are you trying to make?

I am talking about the church imprisoning a man for discovering that in opposition to what they believed was the word of God, the Earth was not the center of the universe.

That gave the world the fundamental choice...is every scientist a heretic and should be silenced? Or is it possible that the church's belief in what they thought was God's word might need to be revoked.

I was talking about how belief in god "It is just God's will" is antithetical to scientific discovery.

How the hell do you link that to financial debocles?


reply posted on 1-11-2008 @ 06:48 PM by Lucifer Rising
Originally posted by bruxfain
I answered questions. You rejected them. As far as my eyes can see and my mind can understand, I am honest to the best of my ability.

I'm from here, America.

So what is so irrational about this argument...Society without God would be a worse place; or more accurately not a place at all, as it would certainly disintegrate, literally.

I brought up current events illustrating how knowledge is insufficient for Society to survive and that faith and God, are the only reason you are here to be able to have this conversation with me.

Please what is so irrational about this? I would like to hear this answer.

PS. Do you know what psychic terror is?


The pure level of stupidity in this argument is tiring. Current events and people's "knowledge" have nothing to do with anything I am talking about. Are you suggesting God should have been in charge of our money? Go get him, you met him once.

It is a huge stretch to say that because some people used what they knew, or thought that they knew to foul things up...we need god. Where was god when all those priests were touching little boys? How about when falwell, Baker, Haggert, were doing the unsavory things that they did.

Show me one society that runs smoothly because it has a belief in god.

If you look around, you will see that there is more murder and sin in the most religious places of the world and this is not a new trend except for the growth of secular societies that do not seem to kill each other as often to prove who god promised land to.

P.S. Where do elves come from in America?

Yes, psychic terror is what the government uses to keep us afraid and sheeplike, they learned it from God.

[edit on 1-11-2008 by Lucifer Rising]



reply posted on 1-11-2008 @ 07:05 PM by Lucifer Rising
reply to post by bruxfain



You really need more examples of Religions silencing scientific discoveries? You cannot be serious.

I am responding to the OP.

I do not need a god to tell me what is right and wrong. Why do you?

You need a god to tell you how to be a good boy or girl? That is the only way a society can survive? Ok SHOW ME ONE!

My ethics are not so far from most peoples 'morals' the difference is that i do not need someone else to set the rules and hold punishments and rewards over my head to get me to do it.

So, society is far better off WITHOUT GOD.

What does god ever give us? War, murder, rape, hampering of scientific discovery. That is what god gives us besides those silly rules that we do not need god for at all.


reply posted on 1-11-2008 @ 07:35 PM by Lucifer Rising
reply to post by bruxfain



Sorry, my bad. I am so stupid. I just realized that I am trying to be logical with an elf that was an old man 120 years ago. Silly me, maybe I should go play with the reptillians or Pleadians instead.


reply posted on 1-11-2008 @ 07:59 PM by flyindevil
reply to post by bruxfain


No, what I am saying is I can't trust you. I don't think a person can be over 120 years old and 37 years old at the same time.
P.S. I swear I've seen that photo somewhere else, but I can't seem to remember where.
P.P.S. This thread is starting to go off-topic.

[edit on 1-11-2008 by flyindevil]


reply posted on 1-11-2008 @ 08:01 PM by Lucifer Rising
reply to post by bruxfain



Um...no.

I have been all over the topic. Of course that response was not to me, but I am like that.

When did we have 'my' world? I must have missed that.

Seriously. Just answer these things

1. When and where did my world ever exsist.

2. What is "my" world?

3. How would you know?

4. Where do elves come from in America?

5. Why should anyone take an elf seriously about anything?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



EVOLUTION - Did YOU Know?
  Posted 19 days ago with 24 member flags
"I was raised an atheist"- Professor František Vyskočil
  Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags
The meaning or point of existence or life
  Posted 12 days ago with 2 member flags
Sand Castles and Science
  Posted 11 days ago with 2 member flags