posted on Nov, 1 2008 @ 12:12 AM
So if Obama has his troops attack Palin, it is not the same as Obama attacking Palin? Sorry, I don't buy that logic.
I would say the pettiness of the wardrobe attacks is more slimey than the terrorist association attacks. Obama's terrorist associations are
relevant, while Palin's wardrobe is not.
Congress gave her the money for the bridge, even though she told them she didn't need it. She took the money, and spent it on more important
projects. Sounds like she did the right thing, while Obama who voted for the Bridge to nowhere TWICE, was acting the fool.
I have been specific, while you are all over the board.
Look at Palins record, she has reduced the money that Alaska receives from the federal government, while remaining popular. You want to pretend this