It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Another Warning From Washington Regarding An Attack After the Next Pres. Takes Office..

page: 5
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in


posted on Oct, 31 2008 @ 07:28 AM
it's the arrogance and cynicism of the power elite (and their understanding of how ignorant and complacent the masses are) which allows such blatantly outspoken 'warnings'; perhaps some of these people do have a heart; or perhaps it's propaganda designed to get the public looking the other way again... say, to Iran or China or Russia..

either way, I'm concerned about Atlanta and Los Angeles as probable targets..

posted on Oct, 31 2008 @ 07:31 AM
Sounding very familiar,an attack on US soil,time to impliment martial law,kind of paving way for a socialist agenda sounds to me,I'm sure they will say with martial law in effect crime will be curtailed,why Obama scares me,these quotes from others are his own people

posted on Oct, 31 2008 @ 07:46 AM

Originally posted by space cadet
reply to post by king9072

King you must be ill informed. Al Quiada was labeled a terrorist organization by the UNSC, which includes many nations other than the US, also named a terrorist organization by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the Commision of European Communities and the European Union, The Australian Government, The Government of India, Japan, Isreal, South Korean foriengn Ministry, Dutch Military Intelligence, United Kingdom Home Office, Pakistan, Russia, Swedish ministry of Foriegn affairs and the Swiss Government. Oh, and the United States.

Space Cadet and all others who want to know the truth about "Al Qaeda"

I STRONGLY SUGGEST you read my post here, look at the source, and learn: The Truth About Al Qaeda!

So back to reality and not spin, this is worrying.

We now have stories circulating that the Chinese are worried of an imminent attack on them, Russia or china based on the RAND story Here - Prison planet Rand Corporation Lobbying Pentagon To Star War To Avert Financial Meltdown

We have the warnings from many as this OP shows and others from several different sources that something will happen in , or I think IN BETWEEN the vote and Inauguration, of any new president.

We have the Iranian Issue which has to come to a head soon in some shape,
America is attacking Pakistan, Syria and ignoring Nation State Borders.

We have the very worrying and "Coincidental" "accidents" of all the microbiologists for years.

Now if anyone wants to see how this has played out with "Experts" being kept quite or murdered to suppress the truth, when they want to lie about these situations we only need to look at Dr David Kelly from the UK.

He was the UK's leading expert on all WMD's and was obviously silenced because he tried to get the truth out.

Proof of this can be found here:

Liberal MP Norman Baker, who was interviewed in the BBC programme, outlines the results of his investigation. He states that it was not suicide, but murder.

"Describing his approach as non-sensational and factual, he said he has tested various theories 'to destruction'. One witness who contacted him recently claimed to "know" that Dr Kelly was murdered. Asked about "complicity of the State", Mr Baker chose his words carefully, claiming this would 'set the hares running'. He is pursuing a number of leads"


On November 3, 2006, The London Times published a letter by Lord Hutton, in which he attempted to defend his report on Dr. David Kelly's death.

In the letter, Lord Hutton dwells on the issue of the allegedly "sexed up" intelligence, ignoring the arguably much larger issue of his failure to establish exactly how Dr. David Kelly died.

However they refused The Times to then publish a response by three Leading Experts, which though can be seen here:

Lord Hutton presided over an inquiry which sought to apportion blame between the BBC and the Government for the "suicide" of Dr David Kelly when no "verdict" of suicide had been (and still has not been) reached. His report was widely labelled a "whitewash", because he was perceived to apportion that blame unfairly (given the evidence he had heard), all but exonerating the Government, and placing the blame almost entirely on the BBC. Now, in his letter published in the Times (3 November 2006), he seemingly seeks to defend his report by setting out his case re the minutiae of the "45 minute claim".
Lord Hutton misses the essential point. What is more, it appears that he was used by the Government to subvert due process in establishing precisely how Dr Kelly died. We and several other medical colleagues (and lawyers) attempted in a series of six letters published in The Guardian and one in the New Statesman to inform the public, and the mainstream press, that all doctors learn at medical school that, in order to return a "verdict" of "suicide", a coroner must prove suicide beyond reasonable doubt (a very high level of proof), including "intent" to commit suicide, also beyond reasonable doubt.

If the Coroner cannot achieve the necessary level of proof, he is required by law to return an "open verdict", assuming that "foul play" has at the outset been excluded in the proper manner. Unfortunately, there is some doubt as to whether "foul play" was properly excluded in the case of Dr Kelly.However, disregarding any such failure in such a high-profile death, it is important to understand that the public was invited to believe that Dr Kelly's death would be better investigated at the Hutton Inquiry than at a coroner's inquest, when the exact opposite was the case.
Dr David Kelly is the first British citizen to be denied an inquest in such circumstances. Given the clear "insufficiency of inquiry", regarding the cause of death over which Lord Hutton presided, the Coroner should have re-opened the Inquest. There are unconfirmed reports that he (the Coroner) now regrets that he did not do so. It is our view that if the Coroner is not able at this late stage to reverse his decision, a fresh inquest should be ordered.
Yours faithfully

C Stephen Frost BSc MB ChB
Christopher Burns-Cox MD FRCP
David Halpin, FRCS

Full Report Global Security

In addition:

Fresh doubts were raised over the suicide of Dr David Kelly after it emerged that no fingerprints were found on the knife he supposedly used to kill himself. The Hutton Inquiry into the death of the Ministry of Defence weapons expert ruled that he slashed one of his wrists with a blunt garden knife and took an overdose of pills.

Daily Mail UK

By the way the "overdose" was by a handful of paracetamol.... which as everyone knows takes a week or two to kill you of liver failure, not over 8 hours, or so.

So we can see above it is known that such experts, who can call into question the reasons for, or truth of WMD's have been killed in very recent times, and the missing Microbiologist’s are a long standing and growing problem:

"The insurance industry uses scientific tables to accurately predict death rates. Based on the 1997 CSO Mortality Tables, the odds that all of these men could collectively die during a 30 month period is a staggering 14,000,000,000:1


We also know that the Anthrax used in the USA came from Military sources as said on the HISTORY CHANNEL here:

History Channel Admits Anthrax Attacks an Inside Job

and also here:

US investigators searching for the source of the East Coast anthrax attacks are increasingly entertaining the theory that the culprit is a former member of the US biological weapons programme.

The Independant UK

We also know that Weaponised Biological agents have been engineered since the 60's that can specifically attack a certain "Race" or "sex" or "DNA type" and leave others alone.

It is certainly not a great leap of science that using Vaccines, chemtrails, water based chemicals to allow certain parts of the worlds population to become "infected" and others not?


posted on Oct, 31 2008 @ 07:47 AM

The New Yorker's excellent piece published on 15 January on Basson's trial covered 18-pages. It is a veritable collector's item. In it, William Finnegan, reported the evidence led in court thus far:

"There [have been] revelations of research into a race-specific bacterial weapon; a project to find ways to sterilise South Africa's black population; a discussion of deliberate spreading of cholera through the water supply; large-scale production of dangerous drugs; the fatal poisoning of anti-apartheid leaders, captured guerrillas, and suspected security risks; even a plot to slip thallium - a toxic heavy metal that can permanently impair brain function - into Nelson Mandela's medication before his release from prison in 1990.

Basson himself has admitted in court that his foreign contacts did not know about his SADF connections. "At times, he was a medical researcher - that worked well enough, in 1984, to persuade the Centres for Disease Control, in Atlanta [USA], to send eight shipments of Ebola, Marburg and Rift Valley viruses to South Africa (and, thus, to Roodeplaat)", according to Tom Mangold in his book, Plague Wars.

Basson himself is quoted by The New Yorker as having modelled Operation Coast on the American chemical weapons programme, which he first managed to penetrate in the early 1980s.

"He also had great success, by his own (and his military superiors') account, penetrating the [chemical and biological warfare] programmes of Britain and the former Soviet Union". "He attended international conferences of forensic toxicologists in Western Europe and aerospace medical officers in the US; befriended key scientists, military men and programme administrators, particularly those who seemed interested in his battlefield tales of fighting communism on the frontline in Southern Africa". "[He] claims to have gained entrance to world-renowned facilities such as Fort Detrick in Maryland [USA], or Porton Down [UK]; and energetically expanded his work as he went along."

So it is proven a NAZI type of government for many years had researched this, and if a country Like S.Africa could be doing this in the 60’s 70’s and 80’s god knows what the USA and similar countries have managed to produce.

There is real concern over AIDS for example, is it a real natural disease? I wont keep quoting google im sure you will be very surprised that many and I mean many top leading virologists who are coming out state that 1 It does not exist, i.e. HIV leads to AIDS or

2. That is was man made

We have the issue of Bird Flu H5 and its variants, which could easily be released after a little tweaking whilst those that be sit underground with filtered air for a few months as the world population crashes to a 1/3 of it or less of its current size. That type of world wide plague weapon though being non specific to group or race would be very very easy to produce, nature does it anyhow, it is a lot easier to produce a Human to Human H5 viral pathogen than any race specific drug.

Which as I show above is known to have been produced and research has taken place for many years.

If it was released there is no-one to blame could be blamed on natural causes as all the experts who could identify any human meddling as shown above are dead, or working within the Military Industrial Complex.

No protests on the streets if this happened, even if your country was Nuking others.

IMHO this is the real threat the Biological weapons. Though we should never forget the likelihood that one of the Barkendale Missing Nukes would make a much stronger impression on the global “War on Terror” than 9/11 did and give immediate carte blanche to any administration.

Oh strange that some of the Barkendale “insiders” are dead now with the base commander shooting himself, ahem in a room next to his young and beloved daughter, yeah right of course.

Look Project Camelot

Nukes? Virus, Chems or a mixture?

This is what they are warning about.

Truly Worrying.

Happy New Year everyone?

Kind Regards


Edit Layout and following source for S.African Quote on top of THIS post Here

[edit on 31-10-2008 by MischeviousElf]

posted on Oct, 31 2008 @ 07:58 AM
A biological attack would be the perfect tool for them to us. You could declare martial law, restrict movement to prevent the spread and round up undesirables as infected people. Plus as it spread it kill off large numbers people which is one of their expressed goals. Good luck. Get you MMS now. it could save your life and your families life.

posted on Oct, 31 2008 @ 08:10 AM
I see it too. What you have to take into account is he's privy to far more intel then us. How many attacks have been stopped/ prevented that we don't know about that, he does, that never makes the news because of the panic it might create. Yet he gets none of the support that biden is urging us to blindly give obama. I only hope if BO gets in that the press treats him the same way they treat Bush, putting everything he does under a microscope. . . no wait that won't happen bo owns the press.

"When I see Bush at these things lately he looks haggard. I know there is a lot of vitriol toward him, but have you ever entertained the idea that he is just a useless tool in this whole game, that he really wants to speak up but either wont or cant."

reply to post by retzius

posted on Oct, 31 2008 @ 08:19 AM

Originally posted by retzius

Serious guys, lets think about this..

What situation could possibly exist, where those in power (a.k.a. the men in high castles as I like to call them) would be trying to warn us, but couldnt say it directly?

I mean, they are the ones in power right? What could they possibly fear or how could their hands be tied to where they are trying to leak info to the press but cant say it outright?

Could it be that the powers-that-be know that they can't keep the truth supressed about 9/11 after a new administration is installed? Could it be that there will yet another false-flag black op so they can deflect the electorates attention?

Let's face it, if they had any info there was going to be an attack, they could field enough people or troops to stop it. That is, unless there was an attack (or false flag attack) by Russia or China.

One of the most important things we could do right now is to remove the current leadership in our political system and security services. There is no saving the body if you don't remove the gangrene.

[edit on 10/31/2008 by anonymousATS]

posted on Oct, 31 2008 @ 08:29 AM
With out providing any data I would like to point out that we cull the population at certain points of history too. World wars are one way, nature does it with plagues. Would any like to expand on this ???

posted on Oct, 31 2008 @ 08:39 AM
yes in overcoming many of the causes of an early death our population has exploded. Up to a 50% reduction of world population has been suggested. War destroys infrascruture where as biologicals just kill people. I believe this will be the next move that they will make.

Also would like to add that if we new what the presidents knows right after his first intelligence briefing we would probably all # our pants.

It would seem that we are also caught up in an ancient war going on between two races on the planet. Could be a possible escalation in the works between these two. duck and don't get caught up in this war as it my engulf the whole world soon. hope not as there are some at work to try and prevent this.

posted on Oct, 31 2008 @ 08:43 AM
Okay people I guess no one has seen this but me. On a website for predictions, it is predicted that a CHEMICAL ATTACK is going to happen in the USA during March of 2009. And it is said that NO ONE can hide from it.

posted on Oct, 31 2008 @ 08:49 AM
reply to post by retzius

This has been going on now for at least 2 times a year ever since that
day in 2001. Is there a limit on the amount of times you can cry wolf and
the people will listen and believe, apparently there is no limit.

FUD is certainly alive

posted on Oct, 31 2008 @ 09:22 AM
Does anyone remember the veiled references to 9/11 that were in that Simpsons episode? The one that only made sense after the fact?

How about the episode of the X-files that basically outlined 9/11, again only obvious after the fact.

If something is really going to happen at the time indicated, it's a bold move and somewhat out of character for them to reveal it so blatantly.

On the other hand......

There is the theory that factions exist, and that perhaps one of the factions may be (relatively) good guys, and are trying to warn those who are listening, their hands being tied from revealing it openly. However, this sounds a little too Hollywood for me to believe.

I'm more inclined to believe that they are mentioning these things ahead of time to get the idea into people's heads so that folks will be more compliant when the crime is perpetrated. Who knows? Just keep your head on, and don't do anything stupid.

posted on Oct, 31 2008 @ 09:23 AM
While reading this news I had a thought about an old X-Files episode, or maybe it was the first movie, either way. One of the Illuminati comes to Mulder and tells him things only they know, and he says he's doing it for his Grand-Children. So I do think some of these guys have a conscience and want the information out, yet they fear for their lives and their families, just as anyone else would.

I think by the time reality sets in, they're too deep in crap to do anything about it. Plus how do any of us know that whomever is running this game, is agreeing with everyone else in their group?

Just a couple random thoughts.

[edit on 31-10-2008 by Maverycke]

posted on Oct, 31 2008 @ 09:40 AM
reply to post by robertnesta

it must be a shock to you but the total murdered people is over 75
see the link below:

And the list

New Zealand

posted on Oct, 31 2008 @ 09:42 AM
It's fear mongering. They're preying on the publics fears that Obama is too young and inexperienced to face a crisis.

That's it, guys. For the love of education and critical thought, don't read into this turd the very media you distrust has given you.

Thank you for your time.

posted on Oct, 31 2008 @ 09:49 AM
My previous perception has been that sometimes it seems that they are threatening a catastrophic event if Obama gets elected, and Mc tried to play that up.

This one seems more generalized and less specific to the candidate, only that he is a newly elected President.

posted on Oct, 31 2008 @ 09:52 AM
There are two groups. A north and a south. extremes always balance. This is the way it is and way it has to be, and the way it has always been. Don't get caught in the extremes.

posted on Oct, 31 2008 @ 09:54 AM
-If- and in my opinion thats a big -if- there is something to this then my instinct tells me all this speculation is for naught because this is all smoke and mirrors. Watch the right hand kids while the left hand works the real magic.

What would actually happen is 180 degrees off all the guesses, on a timeline far enough out to put serious doubt on any of the rampant speculation that may of gotten it right.

posted on Oct, 31 2008 @ 09:58 AM
They Don't know anything and they are not telling us to get ready, They are trying
to frighten us into voting for McCain. Period

posted on Oct, 31 2008 @ 10:06 AM

Originally posted by retzius
Serious guys, lets think about this..

What situation could possibly exist, where those in power (a.k.a. the men in high castles as I like to call them) would be trying to warn us, but couldnt say it directly?

I mean, they are the ones in power right? What could they possibly fear or how could their hands be tied to where they are trying to leak info to the press but cant say it outright?

I find that very strange..


Well I can give you a scenario where this might happen. Suppose you are one of "the men in high castes" as you call them, and you get some non location specific information from some intelligence asset. Then you want to warn people without too much specifics. This way you dont compromise your asset.

[edit on 31-10-2008 by justsomeboreddude]

<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in