It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Yeah but they would lose revenue on the tuxedos, cause all partys would be wearing wedding dresses
Originally posted by CureWish
wow....nobody has anything to say??
i'll subscribe to this and check back... plus star and flag for you
Originally posted by Diplomat
The other day my friend was telling me to vote against gay marriage because men would team up and exploit the system even though they aren't really gay. That had to be the dumbest thing I've ever heard lol.
Originally posted by Diplomat
The other day my friend was telling me to vote against gay marriage because men would team up and exploit the system even though they aren't really gay. That had to be the dumbest thing I've ever heard lol.
Originally posted by Truther
Yeah but they would lose revenue on the tuxedos, cause all partys would be wearing wedding dresses
Originally posted by Interestinggg
"Wouldn't gay marriage boost the economy?"
In short No.
Because although there is many Gay people.
Number 1 not all of them would want to get married.
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
You forgot the money they would spend on Lawyers. Gay divorce would go hand in hand (pun intended) with Gay marriage! Being divorced myself, I'm all for banning marriage for everyone! Considering the 50/50 chance of ending up in divorce court, it's a gamble at best!
Originally posted by scientist
yes, but they do buy designer name brand clothing..... (/stereotype)
Another thing to note, is that on the ballot, the part where you vote to "preserve" marriage between man and woman, it also says that it will cost an undetermined amount of money, "but is expected to be minor." If that isn't one hell of a loophole, I don't know what is. I mean.... that sounds like they stuck a foot in the door for loading it up with pork barrel spending.
.....
Just seems ridiculous to spend money, to keep people from getting together and spending more money.
[edit on 30-10-2008 by scientist]