Tinley Park UFO - Calling all the UFO debunker's out - Debunk this one!, page 10
Pages: <<  7    8    9    10    11    12    13  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 29 times


reply posted on 1-11-2008 @ 01:33 PM by C.H.U.D.
reply to post by LordThumbs



Hi LordThumbs,

Sorry, nearly missed your reply to me in this deluge of posts.

It's not that I don't have confidence in other people - I do! Just not when it comes to observing celestial phenomena.

How can you tell if it's a light 50 feet away, 1 mile away, or a million miles away? You can't without other points of reference.

You may not want to accept it, but all the evidence says is that people are bad at observing things in the sky. Why is that so hard to accept, when it's so well documented?

I don't like being told I'm wrong either, but in some cases it's inevitable, and I accept that. Do you want to know the truth, or would you rather that people let you believe what is obviously erroneous?


reply posted on 1-11-2008 @ 02:10 PM by karl 12
reply to post by TH3ON3



Good post ,regarding the vid I´ve got great repect for Michael Shermer in other fields but when it come to UFOs/OVNIs it seems the man is unable to access his objective,impartial faculties and insteads prefers to just shoehorn his own (quite cynical) preconceptions onto events.
As for the unknown flying object,perhaps you can use this handy debunker spotting guide:
weblog.timoregan.com...

Cheers Karl

[edit on 02/10/08 by karl 12]


reply posted on 1-11-2008 @ 02:57 PM by easynow
Originally posted by MC esher
reply to
post by TH3ON3



I actually saw this thing in Tinley Park. No joke, I saw it. Here is my story:

Me and a bunch of my friends had just played baseball in the late after noon. It was hot out and we kicked the other teams butt. We came back to my friend Johnnys in Tinley, from Orland Park the next town over and BBQed drank some beers etc. We were having a good time partying it up. It was a very clear sky that night but the night was really pretty dark. NNormally near chicago you can only see a couple stars but out in Tinley away from the city you can see everything. Round 12:00pm, could be later; but it generally seemed around that time. Facing east, towards lake Michigan, at about a 80 degree angle (almost directly above but not quite) we see three red lights. Crazy, we all start joking around, take a few pictures, one guy takes really shakey video. We even woke up my friends dad to confirm our sighting. The red light was really bright, in the same way that a vcr light is in a completely dark room. Just like the History chanel said, it was a triangular shaped arrangement of lights. The UFO lingered for about 30 minutes or so moving in direction only slightly. But it did seem to move up and down in terms of altitude. At some points it seemed as far away as a star appears in the sky. This was probably because of our perspective being almost right under it. At other times it seemed to come really close; with in 15,000 feet in my estimation. But as I said it was definetly moving up and down. I was immediatly convinced this was nothing that i had ever seen before as were my 10 or so friends. The lights did seem to blink once in a while but not with any sort of reasoning and that could just be a result of the atmosphere. When the thing actually left; it appeared to us that the craft went straight up out of the stratosphere. And it happened really quickly. I know the history channel said it went south but the way we saw it the UFO went straight up out of the stratosphere. Again, all we saw was the lights as I said it was really dark that night. This is about everything that I can remember it was a few years back after all. Also about 2 or 3 weeks later there was an article in the Chicago Sun Times about it. So, yeah there it is.


there you have it ...a witness that say's...

I know the history channel said it went south but the way we saw it the UFO went straight up out of the stratosphere.


that means to me that it was likely chinese lanterns

untill you post the raw footage for us to examine...it will be pointless to continue debating this.



[edit on 1-11-2008 by easynow]


reply posted on 1-11-2008 @ 03:06 PM by TeslaandLyne
teslaandlyne (3 seconds ago)
Tesla Flying Machines (TFMs aka UFOs)

Tinley Park Triangle - Top 10 UFO Encounters #4
www.youtube.com...

Or shall I start calling them T&L buggies of science suppression.
What a bunch of pare shaped losers thinking something on earth is not
terrestrial.
The UFO came from the Chicago area... like all the rest floating around
all day and night.


reply posted on 1-11-2008 @ 03:32 PM by easynow
reply to post by TH3ON3



Yes I'm sure those chinese lanterns could stay equadistant in a triangle formation from each other in 30 MPH winds. Nice try but doesn't hold anything except hot air!


well phage has provided evidence that there was little wind that night , so you have to admit that chinese lanterns are a possibility , no ?


reply posted on 1-11-2008 @ 03:38 PM by Phage
reply to post by easynow



It would make balloons or lanterns more feasible but more than anything, if these are the correct nights, it calls into question the reliability of a source that claims 30mph winds.

Where did that information come from?


[edit on 1-11-2008 by Phage]



reply posted on 1-11-2008 @ 03:49 PM by TH3ON3
Originally posted by easynow
reply to
post by TH3ON3




well phage has provided evidence that there was little wind that night , so you have to admit that chinese lanterns are a possibility , no ?





uhhh...No! Most people know that winds increase proportionate to the altitude. Even on a calm night the winds aloft will be much higher. It would defy scientific laws for balloons to stay equadistant even in calm winds for an extended period of time.

I don't believe because of this one sighting, I have seen several unexplained UFO's with my own two eyes. One actually landed in a nearby field. This was way back in 1972 when everything including helicopters produced very loud noise. So no chance of it being a silent chopper if there is such a thing.


reply posted on 1-11-2008 @ 03:51 PM by easynow
reply to post by Phage



Where did that information come from?


good question as i did not see the ufo hunters episode of this case , i can only speculate that the Op got that info from the show ?

if that's true then the ufo hunters credibility is in serious question imo

either way though i find it extremely arrogant to call you out like the Op did in the opening post and also seemed to make this thread the biggest trolling motor i ever seen on ATS :

the last thing i will say is...

if the raw footage is not posted for you to examine...how can this ever be debunked ?

it was a set up if you ask me


reply posted on 1-11-2008 @ 04:22 PM by HankMcCoy
Lots of posts since I last read the thread. I have read all of the remarks pointed at mine, some of them raise interesting side points but I am just going to stay at the topic at hand.

1. Within the FAA (Which in full disclosure, my partner worked for when we were in Washington D.C.) there is a big distinction between "not seeing anything" and "not having any record of unusual activity". If you think the FAA keeps detailed records of every radar sweep coast to coast, you would be sorely mistaken.

2. The point I was making with Vampires being the source of the lights is.. there is no way to prove it was ANYTHING, let alone..

A. Planes (My leading theory at this point)
B. Lanterns
C. Alien Craft
D. LED Balloons
E. Vampires

This is regardless of whether you believe in said phenomenon or not. I can't PROVE it was a vampire, Jimbob can't prove it was an alien craft, and no one else can prove it was an LED Balloon.

My advice when presented with this evidence is...

Follow the money.

Who stands to gain from sensationalizing this footage and turning it into something more mysterious than it actually is? The shows producers and the network.

Everyone is all upset with the MUFON show because it presented them all of this evidence and then showed them, "Hey, look! This evidence was very compelling, but when looked at through the proper scientific filer, you can see that it is all explainable!"

No one wants that.

You all want the Wizard, but you don't want to see the man behind the curtain.
Pages: <<  7    8    9    10    11    12    13  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 9 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 17 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 12 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 19 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 3 days ago with 27 member flags
Jacques Vallee: Implications of UFO Phenomena - Thinking Allowed.
  Posted 1 days ago with 21 member flags