reply to post by interestedalways
Actually I have to say I don't like it. It's three pages of some of the worst stuff I've ever seen. it follows no trajectory towards a point, and
contains little to no analysis or attempts to bring it all together into a cogent point by the author - that being you. So I was trying to figure out
just what's going on here.
I'm not trying to be an ass or anything. I'm simply unable to dredge through three pages of stuff that alternately makes me giggle then want to kick
myself in the face in order to "draw my own conclusions"...
A large part of this seems to be reliant on some very, very bad assumptions of how words in one language family come from words in another language
family. For instance, the conflation between the Egyptian word "mer" (pyramid), the Germanized "mer" (from the latin Mar, for sea) and the
Egyptian "myr" ("Beloved", root of the Hebraic name "Miriam"
We're looking at two different language families on that one - Afro-Asiatic (Egyptian and Hebraic) and Indo-European (Germanic and Latin), and three
different words, which have nothing in common besides similar pronunciations (Similar, not identical. In order they're pronounced Mehr, Murr, and
meer). Somehow all these are supposed to be squished into one blob in order to prove that Isis is the mother of Jesus.
How, exactly, we get "Miriam" from "Eset" is of course, explained through a terrible and convoluted journey of this bad etymology,
mispronunciations, and conflation of one system's gods with those of another system (or even making up a few - septet, are you serious?). This is
shored up by trying to claim the Greek word "Iosos" (Jesus) is the same words as the also Greek "Horus" (Heru), and attempts to pin Heru's birth
on the 25th of december. nevermind that no date of birth is ever given anywhere for Heru, and Jesus was born in the spring,
and that
traditional Christmas was stretched out over a two-week period with the "big day" happening in early January, just as it still is in Eastern
orthodoxy...
I'm not going to go slamming you, except to say that your sourcing is terrible and you need to attempt to "bring it home" so to speak, so that the
reader isn't left gawking at a three-page thread full of nonsense and debunked myths (such as that whole sang real thing? Seriously? That was drowned
back in the '80's!)