We need a place for Abductees moderated by Abductees, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times


reply posted on 28-11-2008 @ 12:33 AM by spacecowgirl
reply to post by Shugo



Differentiating:
1. To constitute the distinction between: subspecies that are differentiated by the markings on their wings.
2. To perceive or show the difference in or between; discriminate.
3. To make different by alteration or modification.


reply posted on 28-11-2008 @ 12:38 AM by Shugo
reply to post by spacecowgirl



And yet all you seem able to do is point out spelling errors, and typos. My case is rested as to arguments as to whether or not you understand how to take criticism. Looks like you need to spend some more time reading ATS debates, or perhaps asking for information in the Freshy Forum.

Since you don't know how to take criticism, and use it constructively, and you also don't seem to know how to communicate with people very well, perhaps these are issues you best address with a doctor. When you've finished this, you may want to ensure that you have the appropriate social skills to engage in formal conversation with people.

By the way, the sky is Mango Orange.
Should you decide to disagree with what I think above, you are attacking me. *tries spacecowgirls logic*

[edit on 28.11.2008 by Shugo]


reply posted on 28-11-2008 @ 12:39 AM by spacecowgirl
reply to post by blowfishdl



Oh is this an alter ego of the previous poster? Wow! Nice to meet you!


reply posted on 28-11-2008 @ 12:43 AM by CA_Orot
reply to post by spacecowgirl



I would watch the accusations. People get into trouble by making them. Perhaps instead of attacking the people who are discussing this issue with you, you could provide more reasons for the particular stance you have taken on this topic.

Just a thought.

- Carrot


[edit on 11/28/2008 by CA_Orot]



reply posted on 28-11-2008 @ 12:44 AM by blowfishdl
Originally posted by spacecowgirl
reply to
post by blowfishdl



Oh is this an alter ego of the previous poster? Wow! Nice to meet you!


hahaha! Now that's funny, I do admire many of greeneyes responses but surely you can tell that I am a male and she a female. I don't even see a personality resemblance in our avatars. Her's isn't even close to as cool as mine is.

[edit on 11/28/08 by blowfishdl]


reply posted on 28-11-2008 @ 12:46 AM by aleon1018
reply to post by spacecowgirl



It would be great if we actually had some credible psychic abductee counselor type of moderator. I have asked before about a poll or a survey section for here.

These could help some of these people without the "skeptic inquisitions."

I see a christian counselor who has an attitude with me when I try to discuss this topic. This is typical for psychotherapy and probably what skeptics also might use "as if" to instill self doubt and use the label: " Delusion"

I've had proof and lost it. But without some display for ATS to video, it's just another story. Group therapy on ATS seems unlikely unless it's better controlled. I myself get angry and my patience is also thinning.

Lets discuss an alternative such as a detailed poll/survey and statisical probability with scores etc. I wonder if Jim Marrs would have some input on that.


reply posted on 28-11-2008 @ 12:49 AM by spacecowgirl
reply to post by blowfishdl



Yeah, whatever. I have been around boards like this for a long long long time. Enough to know that some people have up to 15 personas that they use to either argue their point, badger, cajole or harrass others with such emphasis that other people start to believe them. LOL. I have only one. I can spot a fake ID at a 100 paces.


reply posted on 28-11-2008 @ 12:52 AM by CA_Orot
reply to post by spacecowgirl



Then you are clearly mistaken my dear, your eyes have failed you this time.

ATS allows ONE account and ONE account Only. Did you not read the Terms and Conditions when you joined...?

- Carrot


reply posted on 28-11-2008 @ 12:52 AM by Shugo
reply to post by spacecowgirl



And yet you lack the skills to communicate with people and a professional and mature manner. That seems a bit fuzzy to me. All you do is harp at people, what do you want their responses to be? You want them to take it? You know better than that, they harp at you, and you get all bent out of shape, what do you expect in return? Seriously.

Oh, excuse me for being a human and making a typo, I forgot, that means I'm stupid.

[edit on 28.11.2008 by Shugo]


reply posted on 28-11-2008 @ 12:53 AM by blowfishdl
Originally posted by spacecowgirl
reply to
post by blowfishdl



Yeah, whatever. I have been around boards like this for a long long long time. Enough to know that some people have up to 15 personas that they use to either argue their point, badger, cajole or harrass others with such emphasis that other people start to believe them. LOL. I have only one. I can spot a fake ID at a 100 paces.


Any idea how much time it would take to build up this many points on both persona's (mine and Leos)? Not worth it to win petty arguments. I merely told you to be civil and constructive in your arguments. Something you are yet to achieve so far as I can see.


reply posted on 28-11-2008 @ 12:55 AM by spacecowgirl
reply to post by CA_Orot




How funny and how naive you are. If only that was true!


reply posted on 28-11-2008 @ 12:55 AM by Voxel
Whenever you make a post, or even a new thread, you should be prepared, nay expecting, someone to disagree with you. In fact, as you hit the Post Reply button you should be eagerly awaiting the counter argument.

Why? Because this is a place of discussion NOT a place of agreement.

If you don't want to hear someone who disagrees with you then why are you even wasting our time with your words? Just start your own blog so that we can more easily ignore you.

Abduction threads are NOT FOR PEOPLE who don't believe in aliens.


Sorry you are wrong here and are trying to fit ATS into your ill-conceived notions about what an alternative community is.

ATS is NOT FOR PEOPLE who believe in something (anything) so unquestionably that they will refuse to even entertain the possibility of other explanations.

In fact, I think that line above should be codified into some rule or catchphrase. Like, oh, I don't know "Deny Ignorance" or something.

The issue of unquestioned belief is a huge sticking-point in conversations about religion, global warming, and abductions among other. I have seen people in all of those topics get upset simply because someone had the gall to disagree with them.

If what someone hopes to generate is approval and acceptance from a post on ATS, then all they really want is the equivalent of a place to get some ego porn. The presence of people with this mindset are not a benefit to a community which embraces NOT consolation but exploration as a key tenet.

Jon


reply posted on 28-11-2008 @ 12:57 AM by blowfishdl
Originally posted by spacecowgirl
reply to
post by CA_Orot




How funny and how naive you are. If only that was true!


You cannot create more than one account as it logs your IP address every time you register or even post.


reply posted on 28-11-2008 @ 12:58 AM by spacecowgirl
reply to post by Shugo



sponses:

responses:
1. The act of responding.
2. An answer or reply. Specifically: (a) Reply to an objection in formal disputation. I. Watts. (b) (Eccl.) The answer of the people or congregation to the priest or clergyman, in the litany and other parts of divine service


reply posted on 28-11-2008 @ 12:59 AM by blowfishdl
Originally posted by spacecowgirl
reply to
post by Shugo



sponses:

responses:
1. The act of responding.
2. An answer or reply. Specifically: (a) Reply to an objection in formal disputation. I. Watts. (b) (Eccl.) The answer of the people or congregation to the priest or clergyman, in the litany and other parts of divine service


Please think before you write. Web space isn't free you know. Neither is our time.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^