You wont believe this new commercial!!! *video*, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 29-10-2008 @ 11:58 PM by eNumbra
I saw this a few weeks back, all I could really do was laugh at the thought of Duracell's rejected commercial ideas, where in Energizer is accused of enabling child molesters.



It worries me, less than a chip would, but once we're used to tracking our own children why would anyone refuse governmental tracking?

Most of America may soon be vegetables, stuck to their couches to afraid to leave their homes for the false fears fed to them through their television.


reply posted on 30-10-2008 @ 12:01 AM by hikix
reply to post by 1Veritas



Whatever happened to keeping an eye on your child? Its worked the past 100 of so years. Once again I must be old fashioned.. when I was 9 years old in 1990 and all my friends were playing ball in some random park, we didn't need to be electronically monitored... but then again, that was a different time without terrorists and serial rapists coming to get us



reply posted on 30-10-2008 @ 08:13 AM by Moonage
reply to post by hikix


I tend to go along with the peeps who think this is rather harmless, and quite handy for a parent. I have a five year old who will take off in a mall, ballgame, or anywhere. I'm not so much freaking out like the mother in the ad, I just get real p*ssed having to wander all over the place trying to find him. I can see this as saving the boy's bottom from a good spanking a couple of times a week. As far as the kids never knowing that this is not what was normal for older folks, it doesn't matter. It's a tool that will be used from now on. Giving kids cell phones to protect them was not an option in 1990, it's standard practice now. They do the same things we did, the parents just are a little more secure in knowing they are not completely isolated from them. That doesn't mean they'll trust big brother any more or less than anyone else. It just means the parent is more confident to allow their kids some space. And quite frankly, if the parent is more apt to give their kids more running room, I would think it would better prepare them to not accept intrusions by government. With all the negativity a lot of people feel compelled to isolate their kids from the dangers of the real world. This to me limits their abilities to learn how to deal with the real world until it's too late. The more isolated the mind is, the more vulnerable it is to suggestion.


reply posted on 30-10-2008 @ 12:44 PM by italkyoulisten
reply to post by Moonage


I think what we should do is put our children in cages. That way they'll be safe forever. And if you want to take them places just wheel the cage around. If they grew up in a cage and all children of their generation did as well, they'll never know the difference! We can even give them the freedom to choose to live in the cage or not at a certain age but we will also convince them that if they are not in the cage, they will be kidnapped/murdered/serial raped. This way, we can say that they have all the freedom as a kid who didn't live in a cage (which the caged kids won't know about as it was before their time), but it was merely their choice to live in the cage. That's the genius of the plan!

[edit on 30-10-2008 by italkyoulisten]
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



The Zombie Apocalypse is Real! And it\'s Here Now!
  Posted 15 days ago with 86 member flags
While Americans keep arguing about Trayvon-Zimmerman
  Posted 8 days ago with 79 member flags
The Suspicious Death of MI6 Agent Gareth Williams..
  Posted 18 days ago with 77 member flags
Faked Moon Landing - Amazing Documentary
  Posted 10 days ago with 58 member flags
This is scary!
  Posted 15 days ago with 57 member flags