Obama Smashes Money Record

page: 2
1
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 02:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by deathhasnosound
This is an obscene amount of money to spend on any election.
[edit on 29-10-2008 by deathhasnosound]


It is a large amount of money.

I think however it just goes to show how serious people are taking this election and are doing everything they can to make sure we don't get a repeat of the last eight years, or a supreme court with a "stacked" deck. I think that is dangerous for either side to do.

It's their money and they earned it.

They are willing to donate it for a change in leadership, which is their right.

I guess they think it's worth it.

- Lee




posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 03:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by deathhasnosound
reply to post by intrepid
 
*sigh* For some people it doesn't matter where the proof comes from it will never be good enough once they have made up their mind about something. No use wasting more of my time on a brick wall.
g'day.


Dude, I used YOUR source. Maybe you should have read them clearer and saved us all the time.



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 03:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by lee anoma

Originally posted by deathhasnosound
This is an obscene amount of money to spend on any election.
[edit on 29-10-2008 by deathhasnosound]


It's their money and they earned it.

They are willing to donate it for a change in leadership, which is their right.

I guess they think it's worth it.

- Lee

Unless it comes from a foreign government. Then it becomes ILLEGAL and that is where we are now.



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 03:05 PM
link   
reply to post by intrepid
 
With some people it is better to put them on ignore.
g'day



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 03:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by deathhasnosound
reply to post by intrepid
 
With some people it is better to put them on ignore.
g'day



Good luck with that.


You should have a more open mind. Find facts that either support or deny what you're talking about, not try to find facts to attempt to support what you already believe. THAT will get you somewhere.



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 03:37 PM
link   
reply to post by intrepid
 

Its ok buddy. You drank the koolaid I understand.
Hey if it doesn't bother you that your candidate is bought by foreign powers then nothing will.



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 03:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by deathhasnosound
reply to post by intrepid
 

Its ok buddy. You drank the koolaid I understand.
Hey if it doesn't bother you that your candidate is bought by foreign powers then nothing will.


Not my candidate dude. I'm Canadian. I'm just here denying ignorance. I have done the same with bogus McCain threads.

And Koolaid? I prefer grape.



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 03:44 PM
link   
reply to post by intrepid
 

Deny, the only thing you keep denying is the fact that Obama is bought by foreign powers. Actually you are just outright ignoring it.
But so be it.
This conversation is over, I did not realize you were Canadian.
g'day



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 03:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by deathhasnosound
It's their money and they earned it.
They are willing to donate it for a change in leadership, which is their right.

Unless it comes from a foreign government. Then it becomes ILLEGAL and that is where we are now.

And if it came from the moon it would be made of cheese.

Now...do you have irrefutable proof that this money is coming from a foreign government(s)?

I haven't seen any so far.

- Lee

[edit on 29-10-2008 by lee anoma]



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 03:47 PM
link   
reply to post by lee anoma
 

Before we begin, are you Canadian?



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 04:10 PM
link   
Ok to you Canadians and just plain old koolaid drinkers.
This is as much as the MSM will report on this. And they spun it as best as they could.

The Obama campaign only recently began requiring donors from overseas to provide a valid United States passport number when making a contribution. Previously, it had simply required donors to check a box certifying they were U.S. citizens. www.nytimes.com...


Enjoy, it is from the most liberal source out there so it has a wicked spin on it.



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 04:17 PM
link   
reply to post by deathhasnosound
 



Again, do you have any irrefutable proof that his money is coming from foreign governments?

I am still waiting for you to provide this.

I am not interested in your jokes and jabs just the facts please.

- Lee



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 04:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by deathhasnosound
This is as much as the MSM will report on this. And they spun it as best as they could.


And we're supposed to extrapolate from that that the evil A-rabs are giving Obama illegal money?

Baaadd Canadian!


I said good say!



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 04:20 PM
link   
It is no use, you are under the Messiah's evil spell.
Even the New York Times can't convince you people.
g'day



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 04:35 PM
link   
Let me just say this and make it simple:

Both sides that have found fraudulent or dubious donations have refunded them.
It happens.


Democrats claim McCain violating fundraising rules

By JIM KUHNHENN – 4 days ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Democratic Party plans to file a complaint with federal regulators that accuses Republican John McCain's presidential campaign of various violations of campaign finance law.

In a letter to the Federal Election Commission to be submitted Monday, the Democratic National Committee alleges McCain has received donations from 6,653 individuals who exceeded the legal $2,300 limit by at least $1,000 and 23 donation in excess of $50 from anonymous donors. The DNC cited one donor who appeared to have given more than $56,000. AP News


I am going to speculate and say that this money is coming from...oh I don't know...China maybe?

- lee



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 04:42 PM
link   
reply to post by lee anoma
 

Of course! Why didn't I think of that! Two wrongs do make a right!!
Thank you! I feel so much better now!

"Drink up boys, the koolaid is sweet and plentiful!"



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 04:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by deathhasnosound
It is no use, you are under the Messiah's evil spell.
Even the New York Times can't convince you people.
g'day


Evil spells?


I think you are living in a fantasy world my friend.
This is real life not Harry Potter.

What you have "claimed" and what the Times article "stated" are not synonymous.

But okay, well if you don't think this is worth discussing then I guess I should agree with that too.

- Lee



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 04:53 PM
link   
reply to post by lee anoma
 


Well, we finally agree. Even we can find level ground, Godbless ya!



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 04:55 PM
link   
reply to post by lee anoma
 


LOL, I just love how that article says

The complaint is based in part on data that the McCain campaign provides on its Web site — an extra step of disclosure not required by election laws. The campaign of Barack Obama, the Democratic presidential nominee, does not disclose as much information about its donors as McCain does. Obama only reports the identities of donors who give $200 or more — the legal requirement.


And then goes on to quote

"The McCain campaign's lack of disclosure and disregard for the law he helped write raises serious questions about John McCain's commitment to the openness and transparency the voters expect from their leaders," said DNC General Counsel Joe Sandler.


ROFL, McCain Campaign lack of disclosure, questioning McCain's openness and transparency.

Don't they realize who their candidate is? Tee hee



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 04:55 PM
link   
reply to post by deathhasnosound
 


Although that was somewhat of a strawman, you have acknowledged that your accusation was wrong in response to my sarcasm.

I'm big enough to accept that you have no proof and admit being in error.

Thanks, now lets let the American people choose their President.
All these transparent attempts to disqualify Obama are going nowhere.

Good luck,

- Lee





new topics
top topics
 
1
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join