thanks for the post and info, could you give a brief description of the movie please? i have dloaded it and plan to watch it soon,but would like a little more information on to what exactly its about. i watched the first 5 or so minutes and it seems to be about our laws of physics and such and new discoveries. once again thanks.

Thanks for the link. Interesting about the "comet venus" towards the end. Well worth watching.

I didn't like it that much and lost interest after eighteen minutes of watching the video. The connection between the ancient symbolism and the photos of shapely galaxies taken by the Hubble space telescope built for the purpose of seeing something that the ancient naked eye couldn't obviously detect renders the premise fictional.

I think that the answers to the true nature of the universe will be answered either by the boring, but somewhat reliable way science works, or someone will break the stereotype in the way things are approached and comes up with a ridiculous, but elegant idea based on a different premise than the "archcosmology" -- an idea that will take its hold and develops into a black sheep theory just to be vindicated later on.

Originally posted by stander
I think that the answers to the true nature of the universe will be answered either by the boring, but somewhat reliable way science works, or someone will break the stereotype in the way things are approached and comes up with a ridiculous, but elegant idea based on a different premise than the "archcosmology" -- an idea that will take its hold and develops into a black sheep theory just to be vindicated later on.

Plasma cosmology is a fascinating alternative theory, to our current 'standard model' which is, IMO, badly flawed. Don't get me wrong, it ain't perfect, still has alot of mistakes and suppositions, that it states as 'fact', but it does offer alot more in terms of experimental 'proof'.

IMO, mainstream science at the moment, is a dogmatic belief system, in which only the 'current' theories, or theories that expand the current model, are accepted, this is a seriously flawed way of thinking and it is showing. The old 'publish or perish' system, is gone and has been gone for a while, IMO. Now, people are afraid to lose their credibility by coming up with the more bold and exotic ideas, and so, we are stagnating, re hashing new 'spins' on old ideas, this ain't working.

I can see no way out of this, apart from showing people that there is more to this world, than what is 'currently' discovered, that main stream science doesn't have the answer to everything, they just have a louder voice than most.

I am not trying to have a go at you, just trying to say that just because a theory hasn't been widely accepted by MSS, doesn't make it wrong, it just doesn't fit in with their current 'frame of reference'.

One of the greatest things I like about 'plasma cosmology' or 'the electric universe' is the possibilities it would open. Now I know, just because it has greater possibilities, doesn't mean it is right, but it just makes more sense to me. Everything, in plasma cosmology, is connected, from the planets, to the stars, to the galaxies, right the way down to your billionth and one atom. It gives rise to an 'Aether' or a pervasive energy that encompass' anything and everything. Basically, all the supposed 'black technologies' such as ZPE, phase propagation, quantum teleportation, weather manipulation, none of them, seem like 'sci-fi' when you think about the possibilities that this field would open up.

Sorry for the rant, this subject get's 'brushed' to the side far too quickly and far too much for my liking and it 'grinds my gears'.

EMM

[edit on 31-10-2008 by ElectroMagnetic Multivers]

Well, from what I have seen, the standard model of our Sun, hasn't answered many questions, the list of the things the ES theory explains, that the SM can't is the overuling factor for me, 10 major aspects of our Sun, that still can't be explained today, are easily explained, and whats more, easily replicated under laboratory conditions.

A sustained thermonuclear reaction has never been achieved to this date yet the way in which they 'imitate' these reactions on Earth is using Z-pinch fusion, the very same Z pinch fusion the ES model theorizes takes place on the surface of the Sun.

These aspects, would lead me to 'bet' on 'the underdog' anyday, but thats me.

EMM

nice video very interesting, though I do wish they would have gone a bit further into tying all the different parts of their theory as one.

Are we talking about mathematical, "observed", or theoretical physics here?

We need people who talk to the uber scientists who have SANE ideas that can account for things we haven't tried to figure out yet.

I am not knocking EU but I am not saying Zero Movement to "fantastical" theoreticals, either. Meh, mainstream is the issue here. You have to give them debatable, testable, and "provable" solutions so they can extol how great they are and how dull their job "really is".

Michio Kaku has talked about EU yet? Or is he not concerned with that? He should get credit for something that is "huge", in my opinion, because he has talked openly about his futurist ideas. I think we could speed things up a wee bit but there isn't really any point except to benefit "the little guy" - combining solutions into a miniaturized but amazing, uhm I guess mentally "technological" advancing answer for problems is a good idea even for businesses and the uberelitists, they just might not get the idea of expediating the advancement of the common will.

Meh, who am I to talk?

Is this seriously a new theory? This is hard for me to believe. Or else im insane or something.
I watched this, and for some reason, I just assumed we already knew we were in an Electric Universe. Watching them explain the electric sun theory I was dumbfounded, I thought thats what they already thought, I assumed the nuclear theory was ancient or another aspect of the electric theory. I didnt realize such theories were new and unaccepted. Weird. I understand the other theories fairly well, but I just assumed they took into account the fact that electricity makes up everything and electricity connects large bodies over vast distances etc etc connecting everything with everything else. Or perhaps, I assumed that electricity makes up everything even the "empty" space. Hmmm. Im having De Ja Vu now, this is weird.