It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheWayISeeIt
Squirrel,
S & F from me, but I do have a question about your reference to Imoto's water experiment being successfully carried out 100's of times. I was most moved by that experiment when I first saw it in 'bleep' -- more so than any other part of that film -- so I went to research it and found that those experiements have never been reproduced with the same results.
Perhaps that has changed in the few years since I last looked? I did a cursory Google, just now, and am still not finding any corroborating evidence to back up your claim, and I really want you to be right about that. Can you please link to any data you have found that points to Imoto's work being sucessfully reproduced even 10's of times?
Thanks for the thread!
TWISI
anyways i wanted to ask if you have a mystic cross on your hand?
Originally posted by Alexander1111
reply to post by Magnus47
What I didn't understand from your reply is why the electron is hit by photons only when we observe it? I mean isn't the electron "perceptible" even if we don't observe it (in other words, aren't photons bouncing off the electron even when we do not observe it)? Why doesn't it change its behaviour then?
Originally posted by Alexander1111
Anyway, from what you explained to me and the information in these videos, I gather that an electron, even though a sub-atomic particle, seems to be more complex, if not in nature (i.e. consisting of even smaller particles which are as of yet undiscovered), at least in its behaviour and properties.
Originally posted by Alexander1111
This entanglement property seems to allude to multidimensionality and the ability of these particles for time and space transcendence...
The electron does not become a wave until a force sends it toward its target.
Also, it is incorrect to say that the same object can be seen in multiple positions, both at the quantum level and of course the "real" level. It is only while as a wave that the electron passes through both slits.
I'm afraid your hypothesis fails with your first postulate.
Out my league too. All I have to go by is "quantum mechanics for dummies",
The only force which could create such a wave is God, which to some, does not exist. If we each impose our will on the universe, those who chose to not believe in God would bring about the collapse of the entire wave. A paradox.
Originally posted by enigmania
I would also like to add that in more advanced double slit experiments, it was found that:
-if you don't measure through wich of both slits the single particle goes, it wil behave as a wave after the slits.
-if you measure wich of both slits the single particle goes through, it will behave as a particle.
-if you measure wich of both slits the single particle goes through, but immediately erase the info of the detection, it will still behave as a wave.
This proves that the physical act of measuring, is not what causes the destruction of the wave.
It's the act of the info reaching the experimenters consciousness, what causes the wave of potential to collapse.
The experiment can be done with photons and electrons and even some more particles, with the same result.
Originally posted by SolarSeaman
In the book of Mary?, I think, Jesus basically told Mary string theory. Jesus supposedly said "we are god" or "we are all god" or something. Jesus is supposed to have said the most valuable attribute is Courage, above all else. VERY FUNNY to me. . . .