This isn't really well thought out. I prefer to think things out. Instead I find myself speaking *while* I'm thinking; which is a bit like handing
in an equation half worked out and listing your last sqribble (sp) as the answer.
Originally posted by SIEGE
This was, is, will be, a trip to read. Wish I you knew.
Where are you me them when Balbir dies ? Will it happen
again and again ?
!Thanks!
And thanks... (traditionally I haven't been the safest person to know-I'm not even very cool, and have few redeeming qualities).
(see below)
*edit* Oh!! Read that backwards.
Wish you I knew, too, maybe, and perhaps. To know you, I'd have to have known you and have known you far in advance. To even decide that I knew you
and how could I know if I knew, without knowing you, you seem to not know me, rather to know that I'm not knowing you.
*cheers*
You
read that? (hands aspirin)
crazy talk
(which it?) Me meeting myself or Balbir dying?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Where were you?
Balbir:
Well, I was getting out of the car and following his perp, so, about in the hallway when I watched one shoot the other. It was just me-me. We had
driven up from somewhere.
Does it happen over and over?
Balbir
Balbir never went travelling. He dies only once-too many. But I've thought...what if maybe Balbir, is maybe dead but not.
He was our cabby in 78--sw desert boarder of california and somewhere and before that a brief friend on the diaspora from Indian troubles--there were
many. That's all I know of Balbir.
Does it happen over and over?
Me Me
I'm still back tracing the travels to see if there could possibly be any more me's--hard to wrap my head around. But on this timeline...I think
there is just the capability of 2. As I came and went where I was I do not count myself--and I am here now. Because if we did the manner that created
us twice-we'd be somewhere else parrellel(sp) but different (those are a trrrip) as it would have to be an arrival before the initial too soon
arrival and at that point there would be only the creation of the one the other created onnnne...hmm. But for I don't think we settled on our exact
timeline exactly, just close to it, because we came back to the before-and then we stayed.
Really..it's a work in progress.
There may definately be more than one of me on another timeline. But the problem of the timelines was worked out quickly. I believe the first me me
which was my origional self *prior* to leaving on the first trip, got redocumented and adopted out as I watched something of this happen before we
both passed out. I thought I met her later on. I met someone identical to me pysically and mentally. Why wouldn't she remember? At the time I was
thinking other things. And She would. She would remember getting adopted out. But would she say that to a total stranger some 6 years after immersion
into a family? That person that I think has died. And there's a terrible tale. But...there too is my assumption. Where did the other me go.
Where were you?
Grown Up Me:
Some years later...I was getting out of the car and following what turned out to be her/my perp, but her/my perp went up ahead to the causeway by the
stairs, as she/me was walking toward MY current door; but there I stopped in the parking lot, not knowing what I was seeing, still me-then unknowing
she was me grown up, and watched as he ran up and grabbed her neck in a choke hold and shook her about some and she fell down, but her soul didn't
feel gone (there is a feeling to this with anyone), and I wondered that she were not dead, and as he turned and walked back towards me, my head did
the crashing like before when meeting me-me, so I guess it is a thing of proximity, as I know the other me-me and I then (I mean back then) were not
dead. And he dragged me to the car and we left.
In other wards, my younger self, I, deduced immediately after that, that it was me/she because what happened in my head was exactly the same thing
that happened in my head some years (though maybe not so many due to the nature of things) prior when I met my other intial me me who was still here,
when we arrived back before we left.
Which is something you ought not to do. Without first going to a point before *everyone* in the party's parents were born. (if I recall). It was
something like that. And following your exact passage back.
For instance if from 2050 you go to 1921 to 1949 and then on to 2001 and then to 2009. You don't just go from there to 2050 to get back where you
started from, you go to 2001 and then 1949 and then to 1921 and then 2050--arriving *right* after you left; as, if you arrive *right* before you left
you will stand before yourself.
(ponders the amount of doubles the future had to create to figure that one out)
Now, if you don't know this in advance.... and say go from 1977 to 1949 and think to yourself, oh my gosh holy lightbulbs, things don't look right,
and go to 1922 thinking maybe it has something to do with this or that, and try to get back to 1977, and freak out cause things don't look right, and
you've landed in some sort of heavy metal freak land, and try to go back to right where you started in 1977 you will arrive somewhere completely
insane, where you might want to TURN AROUND and figure
to go back to 1922 to 1949 to 1977 AND THEN initiate again to go to 1922 to get to 1949 from 1977.
Somewhere in that lies the answer to the over and over question.
I've pondered the complexity of whether there is a later than me.
I know that someone in the future might read this, and know exactly what it's about, and it makes me wonder if they had travelled back there, if then
all this typing would be then be for naught.
[edit on 28-10-2008 by HugmyRek]