It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

VP Candidate Sarah Palin Supports a NEW 911 Investigation?

page: 1
4

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 28 2008 @ 12:47 PM
link   
Sarah Palin was approached by truthers from We Are Change... and asked if she supports a new investigation........

You may be surprised by her response:



[edit on 10/28/0808 by ThroatYogurt]




posted on Oct, 28 2008 @ 05:44 PM
link   
I saw this before I went to work and was going to post about it but I lacked the time, so thanks for posting this.

This is, interesting to say the least. Now I saw this first on one of Alex Jones' websites, and he warns that Palin is not sincere. However, I feel Alex has somewhat of an attitude that him and his gang are the only ones who can expose 9/11, so perhaps he's being a little defensive. Is she just telling people what they want to hear to try and capture the election? I can't say, but I do know that it is quite a bold statement from a person who could very soon hold a good deal of power in this country.

I would also like to comment on the fact that I expected ATS to be all over this like a pack of rabid turtles on an extra pepperoni pizza. I am a bit surprised that this hasn't gotten much attention at this point. I guess I'll do my part, star, flag and all that jazz.

I guess all hope may not be lost just yet, I'll hope for the best while continuing to prepare for the worst.



posted on Oct, 28 2008 @ 05:57 PM
link   
She's a politician and she'll therefore say whatever it takes to secure a few extra votes at the polling booth. It doesn't mean she'll follow through with it if they get elected as I'm sure it would quickly be overtaken by more pressing matters.



posted on Oct, 28 2008 @ 05:58 PM
link   
I don't beleive it, she's said so much about how she wants rid the world of Islamic terrorists, a new 9/11 investigation, an honest one, would not serve that purpous at all.



posted on Oct, 28 2008 @ 06:05 PM
link   
THIs is a lie. This is a last resort to get you to vote for THEM!!!!!


Dont beleive it for a minute!!!!!!

Pleauhhhhhhzeeeeee.

Nice try.



posted on Oct, 28 2008 @ 10:16 PM
link   
Yea, an investigation of the perpertraitors of 9/11 by the perpertraitors.

I can hardly wait for the 'investigation' to start..



posted on Oct, 28 2008 @ 10:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by Nonchalant
Yea, an investigation of the perpertraitors of 9/11 by the perpertraitors.

I can hardly wait for the 'investigation' to start..

If you feel that you cannot trust even Sarah Palin who can hardly be described as a cunning genius, then how would you conduct an investigation of 911?

How could the US administration satisfy you?



posted on Oct, 28 2008 @ 10:54 PM
link   
i think she's too stupid to know what she's even talking about. she heard family members and first responders and thought wow i better support them without realizing the implications of it.

i wouldn't give it a second thought.



posted on Oct, 28 2008 @ 11:23 PM
link   
Cap'n ohhhhh Cap'n OOOOOOO!
Your obvious agenda nearly lured me in with "911 fade away" thread.

But the Sarah Palin thread...well that is just genius! Tip of the hat to you!

So you think Sarah is a truther???!!!

Oh ok whatevuh! lol!



posted on Oct, 28 2008 @ 11:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by Britguy
She's a politician and she'll therefore say whatever it takes to secure a few extra votes at the polling booth. It doesn't mean she'll follow through with it if they get elected as I'm sure it would quickly be overtaken by more pressing matters.


She followed through on her promises here in Alaska. Just saying. I did not know her stance on that until now. I've met and watched her for years now. She is not a person who says what she does not mean. If McCain wins he will play hell controlling her.



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 12:33 AM
link   
I just have to echo Paul Schaffer's remark to David Letterman. She is one good looking babe!



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 06:12 AM
link   
reply to post by Leo Strauss
 


I never said any such thing. Read the title of this thread and read what I posted on the first post.

You want my opinion? Read Dom's post above.... for the first time I agree with him.



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 09:57 AM
link   

posted by Nonchalant
Yea, an investigation of the perpertraitors of 9/11 by the perpertraitors.

I can hardly wait for the 'investigation' to start..


Yes indeed. The primary suspect investigating itself. Sheesh where have we seen that before?

John Kennedy
Robert Kennedy
Martin Luther King
Ruby Ridge
Waco
Oklahoma City
WTC 1993
TWA Flight 800 1997
Silverado Savings & Loan 1985
Iranian Hostage Crisis 1981
Lockerbie 1988 Pan Am 103
WMDs in Iraq 2003
Enron Kenny Lay 2006
WTC 2001

Dozens more folks

Does anybody detect a pattern here?

Come on. Palin had not the slightest clue what they were asking her.

Just more disinformation from a disinformation specialist.



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 03:40 PM
link   
Like Alan Shore's grandmother says; "This smells funny and I will not eat it."

I feel Palins statements are dubious at best.

[edit on 10/29/2008 by Good Wolf]



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 03:51 PM
link   
New investigation = adding "thermal expansion" to the old investigation.


The silver lining here is that 'they' realize so many have woken up to the 9/11 official farce that it actually could gain them a significant amount of votes by just mentioning it, even if 'they're' just lying about it.

Peace


[edit on 29-10-2008 by Dr Love]



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 09:18 PM
link   
“Come on. Palin had not the slightest clue what they were asking her.

Just more disinformation from a disinformation specialist.”

I agree she didn’t have a clue as to what they were asking… but that doesn’t make it disinformation, nor her a disinformation specialist. Under the best of circumstances she would likely pander to the guy anyway, but its pretty clear she didn’t really hear the question.

Like most things they count on, this is yet another item that is dubious at best.



posted on Oct, 29 2008 @ 11:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jake the Dog Man
“Come on. Palin had not the slightest clue what they were asking her.

Just more disinformation from a disinformation specialist.”

I agree she didn’t have a clue as to what they were asking… but that doesn’t make it disinformation, nor her a disinformation specialist. Under the best of circumstances she would likely pander to the guy anyway, but its pretty clear she didn’t really hear the question.

Like most things they count on, this is yet another item that is dubious at best.

Actually that 'disinformation specialist' was aimed at the OP where the nonsense came from.



posted on Oct, 30 2008 @ 08:49 AM
link   
reply to post by SPreston
 


I am a disinformation specialist because I posted a video from a Truther website?

Try reading the OP Preston, and explain in detail how I am spreading disinformation.



new topics

top topics



 
4

log in

join