Evidence Of Explosives Hurling 4ton Wall Sections on Winter Gardens Roof, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 18 times


reply posted on 3-11-2008 @ 08:23 AM by SPreston
DEMOLITION -


posted by tezzajw
Your proposition: If explosives were present and hurled 4 ton sections, then they must have been large.

Your proof: No large explosions were observed.

posted by Pilgrum
You're taking a roundabout route to arrive somewhere close to what I was saying in terms of the OP's 'Evidence of Explosives Hurling 4ton Wall Sections' - there really is nothing to support that. We have good evidence of 'hurling' and that's about it, the rest is conjecture.

There *could* have been things exploding in there - it commonly happens in large fires after all but if the building was in a sufficiently weakened state to succumb to explosions weak enough to essentially escape detection (externally) we have to remain open to the possibility it could also have failed without them.

DEMOLITION -


Then what are these 'things' which are merely conjecture? What 'things', which you claim are no large explosions observed and which are loud enough to be heard clearly far across the river miles away BEFORE the tower demolition, could these be?

What happened here? Did the 9-11 perpetrators and coverup artists neglect to CENSOR the sound out of this video?


At 9 seconds, a huge explosion heard from across the river, another at 13 seconds, and at 19 seconds, and more during the collapse. The antenna starts to drop at 16 seconds as the core structure is shattered.

What is that huge explosion at 9 seconds pseudoskeptics and defenders of the status quo?




DEMOLITION -





[edit on 11/3/08 by SPreston]


reply posted on 3-11-2008 @ 08:59 AM by Pilgrum
reply to post by SPreston



I see you caught the wall section swinging out toward the Winter Garden - must be well over 20 stories of wall just there.

Those initial 'explosions' (well before the collapse starts) - I don't see any material being thrown out and that's even allowing for the time delay for the sound to cross the river. No violent movements in the smoke plume either for that matter.


reply posted on 3-11-2008 @ 09:31 AM by SPreston
posted by Pilgrum
I see you caught the wall section swinging out toward the Winter Garden - must be well over 20 stories of wall just there.

Those initial 'explosions' (well before the collapse starts) - I don't see any material being thrown out and that's even allowing for the time delay for the sound to cross the river. No violent movements in the smoke plume either for that matter.

Of course. Not hurled. Not explosively ejected in every direction. Just swinging out 600 feet away from the North Tower which collapsed straight down. Heavy structural steel just loves to float in the breeze.

And those 'things' which can be clearly heard miles away before the North Tower demolition, are just unimportant; easily explained away, perhaps sonic booms from the jet fighters sent far away, out over the Atlantic towards the Bermuda Triangle, perhaps to see if those guys had anything to do with it? Does that fairly represent your position? Well at least you are consistent. Along with your comrades, you show there are no limits to your fanaticism.


Then what are these 'things' which are merely conjecture? What 'things', which you claim are no large explosions observed and which are loud enough to be heard clearly far across the river miles away BEFORE the tower demolition, could these be?

What happened here? Did the 9-11 perpetrators and coverup artists neglect to CENSOR the sound out of this video?


At 9 seconds, a huge explosion heard from across the river, another at 13 seconds, and at 19 seconds, and more during the collapse. The antenna starts to drop at 16 seconds as the core structure is shattered.

What is that huge explosion at 9 seconds pseudoskeptics and defenders of the status quo?








reply posted on 3-11-2008 @ 11:08 PM by Soloist
Originally posted by SPreston
Closed-minded people who can never dare to believe what their founding fathers *SNIP*


So those of us who see through your Government hating rhetoric are the "closed-minded" ones? Why, because we don't agree with you? Remember this isn't the LCF, you *will* get called on your cartoon posting rants here. There is no skeptics forum to be banned to if people disagree with you here, and I know that must be a hard adjustment to make.

Are you trying to infer that you are in any way open minded?

Really?

Originally posted by SPreston
It is not possible that the hood ornament and hood would not have been damaged and scratched. Such a ridiculous script. Who wrote this nonsense? Dubya? Is that why you were hiding out in Florida behind small children? You were there on 9-10-2001. Did you do this?


Bolding mine, for increased "closed-minded" effect.

Originally posted by SPreston
since YOUR aircraft left NO JET FUEL on the road or on the lawn or in the Pentagon, then your argument is moot. Correct?

Uh..unhhhh. Can't do that. Not possible. Don't go there.


Originally posted by SPreston
Therefore in summation; it has been conclusively PROVEN that the Lloyde England light pole script is TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE. It could not have happened as scripted.



closed-mind·ed


adjective
Definition:

closed to new ideas or opinions: rigidly and obstinately averse to the consideration of new ideas or other people's arguments


You're better off sparing us of your judgments and humble yourself by not being such a hypocrite.


reply posted on 3-11-2008 @ 11:56 PM by ANNED
I see the extreme distance of debris travel the same as what is seen in "long run-out landslides".
www.agu.org...
adsabs.harvard.edu...
findarticles.com...
www.eos.ubc.ca...

Landslides of this type can start on one side of a valley and cross the valley floor then run up the other side of the valley.
Debris from the land slide of this type can run uphill.

I see the WTC collapse acting just like a long run-out landslide where so much AIR was entrained in the falling debris causing a floating of the debris as it collect at ground level.

Any geologist that studied landslides would see the same actions in a landslide and the WTC debris fall.


reply posted on 4-11-2008 @ 03:03 AM by Pilgrum
reply to post by ANNED



A good observation

The way the debris cascaded from the buildings had a lot in common with fluid motion like waterfalls and landslides.


reply posted on 4-11-2008 @ 09:51 AM by SPreston
posted by ANNED
I see the extreme distance of debris travel the same as what is seen in "long run-out landslides".

Landslides of this type can start on one side of a valley and cross the valley floor then run up the other side of the valley.
Debris from the land slide of this type can run uphill.

I see the WTC collapse acting just like a long run-out landslide where so much AIR was entrained in the falling debris causing a floating of the debris as it collect at ground level.

Any geologist that studied landslides would see the same actions in a landslide and the WTC debris fall.

posted by Pilgrum
A good observation

The way the debris cascaded from the buildings had a lot in common with fluid motion like waterfalls and landslides.



You guys are not joking are you? Where is the hill your landslide slid down? Where is the valley floor and wall your landslide slid back up? You two 'scientists' actually believe this 64,000+ pound multi-section piece of outer wall structural steel 'floated' on a massive column of air over to the Winter Gardens and WFC3 buildings 600 feet away?

- - -



That is hilarious. The video does not show this piece nor any of the other large pieces 'floating on air'. Just how stupid do you think your readers are?

by David S Chandler - Physics-Mathematics Educator - BS-Physics (IPS); MS-Mathematics



Original video

Those heavy pieces are arcing up and out and down, hurled away from the North Tower by massive explosions shattering the central core. None of those heavy pieces of steel are 'floating on air'. Those heavy pieces came down violently from above, piercing the WFC3 American Express building repeatedly as high as 15 stories up and many other buildings also, up to 600 feet away from both towers. Those 4-ton pieces did not slide across West Street and then jump up on the buildings.

Sheesh. you guys crack me up.

Another view of Winter Garden and WFC3 with 4-ton WTC1 exterior wall sections

DEMOLITION -


Visit the website of WTC fireman victim family member Josef Princiotta for more information.

C.S.I. 9/11 by Josef Princiotta

Josef Princiotta – Cousin of Firefighter Vincent Princiotta, FDNY, Ladder Company 7, Manhattan, lost in the collapse of the WTC South Tower.





reply posted on 4-11-2008 @ 01:59 PM by deltaboy


North Tower, I hear no explosion.



How about the South Tower? Look at the corner.


reply posted on 5-11-2008 @ 05:57 AM by fmcanarney
reply to post by ANNED



ANNED,
Here is a simple experiment:

Instead of using styrofoam cups and cards, use bricks, because bricks more closley approximate the surface area to mass ratio of the panels, than cards or cups.

I used flat steppingstone bricks, and got none of them to float anywhere, no matter how high I was when I dropped the other bricks on them.

One thing I expressly caution you though if you use bricks is for you to wear steel toed boots, as there is inherently more possibility in your case that the bricks if they hit your foot will hurt more than the cups or cards.

I am anxiously awating the results of your experiment with bricks, to see if it duplicates my results.

Oh, if bricks are out of the equation then try the same with a set of dominoes. Domino more closley approximated the surface area to mass ratio of the panels than cups or cards.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 11 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 3 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 13 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 7 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 15 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 17 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 7 days ago with 8 member flags