It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mr-lizard
in the study of compatibility between various living creatures and those we have chosen to breed.
Originally posted by gort51
In the early 2000s a Biogeneticist stated that ALL Homo Sapiens come from an "Eve" that existed in East Africa 66,000 years ago...not before, not after.
Indeed, apparently Homo Sapien teeth have been discovered in Israel dated to 400,000 years ago.
The Huge Diversity of "Types" of Humans on Africa, is greater than all types on the rest of the planet.
Yet, They seem to be all classed as "Negroid", even tho a Bushman is so different from a Masai, they could be from different planets.....yet they live on the same continent that the "Experts" say they all came from only 66000 years ago.
Originally posted by Goldcurrent
If some species interbreed but the result of the offspring cannot reproduce, isn't it somewhat analogous to Rh negative females being (naturally) unable to reproduce with Rh positive males?
I mean Rhogane(sp?) is a shot that prevents miscarriage, but without this many Rh women cannot interbreed. Wouldn't this suggest that they are somehow a different species? At least a sub-species or hybrid of some sort.
Originally posted by rickymouse
reply to post by Barcs
It's important to also note that not all humans have been tested. Some people wouldn't even consider giving blood or tissue for genetic testing Testing these common people on any than a volunteer basis has never been officially done. I say officially because we don't know what happens to our tissues after operations are done or by acquisition of other means. We have laws in place that govern release of this personal information but not the for collecting and testing of it as anonymous tissue.