ATF says it has disrupted skinhead plot to assassinate Obama, page 9
Pages: <<  6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times


reply posted on 28-10-2008 @ 04:15 PM by LogicalExplanation
reply to post by Sheridan




Sheridan what's most hilarious about the term "Nazi" as it's used these days, is that it's usually used in reference to something that real Nazis never would have done any way.

Like how people call John McCain or Obama "nazis", when in reality they are quite opposite, and are in bed with Israel for instance. I don't think the real Nazis really liked Israel (or what would go on to become the state of Israel).


reply posted on 28-10-2008 @ 04:19 PM by Sheridan
reply to post by LogicalExplanation


That's my point. The word lost it's real meaning. Good for fear mongering, good for manipulation, but it doesn't have the same meaning in the 21st century, than in the past. And it's also not covering the truth. In the 21st century, it's just one commonly and wrongly used label out of the thousands, nothing more.



[edit on 28-10-2008 by Sheridan]


reply posted on 28-10-2008 @ 04:31 PM by andy1033
reply to post by LogicalExplanation




When people call them nazis, they may not mean same as the german type. Nazi means national socialist, a form of socialism. You may see that people, may mean it that way, and does not really need to be black or white.



reply posted on 28-10-2008 @ 05:20 PM by ZindoDoone
reply to post by sos37



The use of 'Nazi' to portray an individual who is a controlling idiot is one thing. The use of the term in the context of these individuals is that they adhere to the context of the Nazi party of Germany in WW2. They revere Hitler and pledge to live by his example. If thats not being a Nazi, then those that state otherwiset are more deluded than previously stated.

Zindo


reply posted on 29-10-2008 @ 01:21 AM by Teeky
reply to post by David9176



Why would people riot if Obama looses? I see people rioting if Obama wins.


reply posted on 29-10-2008 @ 02:02 AM by Teeky
reply to post by Doom and Gloom



Damn that's a f'd up statement. I really want to know why there is so much hatred? What purpose does it serve? I guess hatred keeps the majority in power. It is very interesting that people want it to be a race war. I think the government and the NWO is a better target, but it's easier to attack a small percentage of the total population. White people would surely win being that they are majority in the states. It's kind of like misdirected anger. You could kill all the non whites off but your government would still be out of control.
And in response to any racist comments: I love you too



[edit on 29-10-2008 by Teeky]


reply posted on 29-10-2008 @ 04:54 AM by GamerGal
reply to post by TruthTellist



Guy looks like he may be Hindu. The Swastika is four Ls, Luck, Life, Liberty, and Love in Hinduism.


reply posted on 29-10-2008 @ 07:11 AM by TruthTellist
reply to post by GamerGal



That's nice and all, but that's not the reality of the situation.

If a white person would go to the mall in that shirt, it wouldn't mean any of those things.

It isn't about who's wearing it - it is a known symbol of hate.

Let's not nit-pick with historical factoids - We all know what the Swastika Symbolizes. Nazism, hatred, skinheads etc...

...so to say it is OK for a hindu to wear the swastika and not a white man is blatant racist discrimination on your part.

"four Ls, Luck, Life, Liberty, and Love in Hinduism. "

: You are just arguing for the sake of it.


[edit on 29-10-2008 by TruthTellist]



reply posted on 29-10-2008 @ 07:21 AM by GamerGal
reply to post by TruthTellist



If a Skinhead wears it it means hate. If a person who follows Hinduism wears it it means Love, Life, Liberty, and Luck. Kind of like a cross means nothing if an Atheist wears it but it means a lot to a person who is a Christian. Although I doubt an atheist would wear it...

[edit on 29-10-2008 by GamerGal]


reply posted on 29-10-2008 @ 08:11 AM by Helmkat
Originally posted by TruthTellist
reply to
post by GamerGal



That's nice and all, but that's not the reality of the situation.

If a white person would go to the mall in that shirt, it wouldn't mean any of those things.

It isn't about who's wearing it - it is a known symbol of hate.

Let's not nit-pick with historical factoids - We all know what the Swastika Symbolizes. Nazism, hatred, skinheads etc...

...so to say it is OK for a hindu to wear the swastika and not a white man is blatant racist discrimination on your part.

"four Ls, Luck, Life, Liberty, and Love in Hinduism. "

: You are just arguing for the sake of it.


[edit on 29-10-2008 by TruthTellist]


Gamer is correct, that particular symbol has more meaning then just the one most Americans know. That many instantly leap to the fear/Nazi/Hitler connection just points out our general lack worldview beyond our own "American" reality.

[edit on 29-10-2008 by Helmkat]


reply posted on 29-10-2008 @ 08:21 AM by TruthTellist
reply to post by Helmkat



Would you ever wear the shirt in the picture I posted?

No. you wouldn't. Now go ahead and disagree just for the heck of it....

*I'm placing you and Gamergal on ignore. Both of you: Please don't reply to me as I won't be able to see it, or offer a rebuttal.




[edit on 29-10-2008 by TruthTellist]


reply posted on 29-10-2008 @ 08:27 AM by GamerGal
reply to post by TruthTellist



I'm not Hindu. Neither is the other guy who is trying to tell you what it means. But if a person of the Hindu faith wore it it would mean something different. Again, an athiest wears a cross it means... nothing. A Christian wears it and it means a lot more then nothing.


reply posted on 29-10-2008 @ 08:35 AM by Doom and Gloom
reply to post by Teeky



I am not a racist. My wife is black. I am white. I love and respect my in-laws as much as I do my own family. The fact that people in today's society feel we owe a debt to another race is the racism. The white people have a guilt that is unvalidated. We are all equals and should behave as such.


reply posted on 29-10-2008 @ 08:36 AM by jibeho
Originally posted by GamerGal
reply to
post by TruthTellist



I'm not Hindu. Neither is the other guy who is trying to tell you what it means. But if a person of the Hindu faith wore it it would mean something different. Again, an athiest wears a cross it means... nothing. A Christian wears it and it means a lot more then nothing.


Anyone with any degree of common sense and anyone who has read just a snip it of modern history would know what the symbol means in today's society. To wear it in public only invites trouble and debate regardless of faith. Some may just stare and others will confront you. My grandfather who liberated two Nazi concentration camps would confront you even if you are Hindu.
Pages: <<  6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



While we were Distracted with Gay Marriage news This happend today
  Posted 17 days ago with 81 member flags
People are marching in the streets all over Quebec
  Posted 2 days ago with 69 member flags
Breaking: Ron Paul to end active campaigning - cnn
  Posted 12 days ago with 26 member flags
President Obama Affirms His Support for Same Sex Marriage
  Posted 17 days ago with 24 member flags
Anon has released 1.7 GB of files....
  Posted 5 days ago with 24 member flags