Obama 2001 Redistribution of Wealth Audio Uncovered, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 14 times
Topic started on 27-10-2008 @ 12:23 AM by flashL3

Obama 2001 Redistribution of Wealth Audio Uncovered


www.youtube.com
Obama Bombshell Audio Uncovered. He wants to Radically Reinterpret the Constitution to Redistribute Wealth!!
In a 2001 Chicago Public Radio Interview
Obama is discussing the best way to bring about a Redistribution of Wealth...
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 27-10-2008 @ 02:27 AM by Hastobemoretolife
What I find about this is that he is actually trashing our constitution and he is actually discussing the best way to redistribute the taxes.

This is why it is a bad thing. A lot of people seem to be caught up in this we are redistributing the wealth to the richest people which isn't the case. Here are three different articles explaining this.

www.realclearpolitics.com...
www.actionamerica.org...
www.nationalreview.com...

The top 50% of tax payers have the highest tax burden. Anywhere from 35-45% of taxpayers don't pay taxes, they get a tax return.

We already have a very progressive tax system. And these are the tax brackets,

www.moneychimp.com...

And here is an article showing that the tax breaks for the wealthy actually increased government revenues.

www.moneychimp.com...

So Obama knows that raising the taxes on the wealthy is actually going to reduce government revenues, but he intends to make up for this by cutting the federal budget.

So my question is why is he cutting money supply to the government and then going to try to make up for it by cutting the federal budget? He is going to increase government spending by a massive amount.

His answer is that because it is "fair."

www.youtube.com...


Then you have this gem of audio that just further increases the evidence that he is a Marxist.

[edit on 27-10-2008 by Hastobemoretolife]

[edit on 27-10-2008 by Hastobemoretolife]


reply posted on 27-10-2008 @ 03:13 AM by Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by Hastobemoretolife



I would rather a Marxist then a capitalist pig. And if I have a say in the matter, I would certainly pick his earlier work (as he later gravitated to paring socialism with autocracy, yuck)!

Unfortunately, neither McCain nor Obama are anarchists, communists, nor socialists.

One thing that is reminescient of a socialistic principle, does not socialism make.

Just the same, I would not call McCain a socialist because he wants to redistribute the wealth of the public to buy up bad mortgages. It is just not that simple.

[edit on 27-10-2008 by Lucid Lunacy]



reply posted on 27-10-2008 @ 03:31 AM by Darthorious
Originally posted by Karlhungis
I am curious why so many republicans are so worried about this? Wealth is currently being redistributed from the working class to the upper class. Obama seems to want to give more to the middle class and below, by taxing the wealthy.

I don't understand why it is hunkey dorey to funnel the wealth to the rich, but it is blasphemy to even suggest the distribution of more of the money to the working people? It seems like an interesting double standard to me. What is really strange to me is that most of the people who are crying about it are people who would actually benefit from it. Most are using talking points that have been generated by people who would be hurt by it though.


It's because of people like my brother-in-law.

He's under the impresion that his parents will be overtaxed/lose benifits if Obama gets in because they make more than 200,000 a year. They actually make millions a year I found out when I was doing their books for them.

All I could say was, "I guess your dad will have to sell off all those cars he has." He spends all his profits on restoring old cars and has millions of dollars worth.

My brother-in-law basicly gets his check from them and makes a nice lump of change and because my sister also has a decent income it may affect them also.

Me, I own a car and a computer and that's it. He (brother-in-law) owns a very large 2 story house, 4 cars, 2 campers, 2 boats and the list goes on and on, and on top of it had to declare bankruptcy at one point.

So too bad I say he should have done what my parents have been doing. They spend nothing in fact sell whatever they can for a profit and keep all the cash not to mention have 0 debt.

So those are the type that are afraid of the new tax idea's by Obama.


reply posted on 27-10-2008 @ 07:50 AM by Marcus Calpurnius
reply to post by Lucid Lunacy



I would rather a Marxist then a capitalist pig. And if I have a say in the matter, I would


This is what we face folks. Posting stuff like this on this forum is pointless, because its full of Marxists, socialist and Communists. I think many people voting for Obama are either just gullible, or they are truly Marxist/Socialists. The same goes for our media, which is why they are deflecting this story at all costs. We are in real trouble fellow Americans......

The one message I have for you Lucid Lunacy, is that you better be willing to fight for it, because many Americans would rather die than let their country be hijacked like that. People will fight.

[edit on 27-10-2008 by Marcus Calpurnius]


reply posted on 27-10-2008 @ 09:04 AM by vor78
reply to post by Marcus Calpurnius



You know, its funny Marcus, his supporters will spend all this time defending Obama against charges that he's a socialist and tell you that he's definitely NOT one, then turn right around and tell you how great socialism is.

IMO, it speaks an awful lot as to what the man is that most of his vocal supporters do, in fact, support socialism.



reply posted on 27-10-2008 @ 09:11 AM by centurion1211
Originally posted by vor78
reply to
post by Marcus Calpurnius



You know, its funny Marcus, his supporters will spend all this time defending Obama against charges that he's a socialist and tell you that he's definitely NOT one, then turn right around and tell you how great socialism is.

IMO, it speaks an awful lot as to what the man is that most of his vocal supporters do, in fact, support socialism.



Starred and flagged.

Unfortunately denying hypocrisy does not seem to be a strong trait for many obama supporters.

And to the europeans wondering why most Americans don't like the idea of socialism, have you known anything but socialism in your entire lives that would allow you to make an educated comparison?

[edit on 10/27/2008 by centurion1211]


reply posted on 27-10-2008 @ 09:47 AM by daddyroo45
reply to post by Karlhungis



It's just a matter as to wether you earn the money through sales .service and distribution or general labor.Or the money is handed to you that didn't earn in either sales,service and distribution or general labor.

What is the incentive to earn more when your tax burden will grow to aid in the support of those not willing to attain independence on their own?
Remember the story of the ant and the grasshopper?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 68 replies