It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by maus80
reply to post by ninthaxis
I agree that these things may be notoriously hard to learn for someone for whom English isn't their first language, but these are things I was taught very thoroughly in grade school. I really don't see how anyone could confuse "you're" with "your", but it seems to be an epidemic.
On þy ylcan gere worhte se foresprecena here geweorc be Lygan .xx. mila bufan Lundenbyrig. Þa þæs on sumera foron micel dæl þara burgwara, ond eac swa oþres folces, þæt hie gedydon æt þara Deniscana geweorce, ond þær wurdon gefliemde, ond sume feower cyninges þegnas ofslægene. Þa þæs on hærfeste þa wicode se cyng on neaweste þære byrig, þa hwile þe hie hira corn gerypon, þæt þa Deniscan him ne mehton þæs ripes forwiernan.
pedantic?
Originally posted by machinegun_go_go
reply to post by Stormdancer777
Old English is extremely interesting. Thank God we got rid of most of the inflections, eh?
You should spend some time getting your head around it. It's a fasinating area of the past to study.
Peace,
MGGG
[edit on 26-10-2008 by machinegun_go_go]
Originally posted by machinegun_go_go
reply to post by Merriman Weir
Good Sir,
In the spirit of this thread, I feel it necessary to point out that 'your' and 'you're' are actually homophones, rather than hononyms.
In linguistics, a homonym is one of a group of words that share the same pronunciation but have different meanings...
...A homophone is a type of homonym, although sometimes homonym is used to refer only to homophones that have the same spelling but different meanings.