Maybe someone with knowlege of law can explain why the judge turned down O's motion to dismiss, and then dismiss the case?

Makes one wonder if this was the judges way of avoiding the limelight, and what making history would bring to his legacy.

The case was dismissed because there was nothing there... if you people did any research on Berg, the Lawyer who filed the suit, you'd have found that this is how he makes money... he finds some conspiracy theory and files a suit, collecting donations from those who "want to believe". He doesn't win them... what a racket! He sued Bush and Cheney alleging that they were in on 9/11, too... face it, this was just a bunch of hot air, get over it.

Who has the right to care where a person was born? Babies are born in this world- by chance of locations. I can't imagine that really changing one's base humanity.

Some very wealthy people will have a lot of lose under Obama, and they will pull out all the stops they can.

Originally posted by TheRooster
Maybe someone with knowlege of law can explain why the judge turned down O's motion to dismiss, and then dismiss the case?

Makes one wonder if this was the judges way of avoiding the limelight, and what making history would bring to his legacy.

I don't recall him ever turning down his motion to dismiss.

The motion to dismiss was filed and that was all. I believe Berg stated on his website that he was "confident" that the motion to dismiss would be overturned, but I don't believe it ever was.

Originally posted by EliteLegends
all of you are some sad sad people ......

just state whatever your real reason is for disliking him instead of making up reasons or excuses

a choice between him or mccain is like night and day i dont care if he's from gd zimbabwe clicking it up with the tribe

if i had to take a guess i would say 3/4 of this thread are avid mccain supporters , keep looking guys ..... dig up that dirt !

If these claims are true you do understand you are promoting the violation of the constitution don't you?

For the record I do dislike Obama but I dislike McCain even more.

That has nothing to do with the law. If you approve of the violation of laws when it comes to selecting the most powerful man in the country than what kind of society does that leave us with. Hint - A criminal one from the top down.

[edit on 25-10-2008 by proximo]

He isn't violating the Constitution because the Supreme Court has ruled in the past that private citizens can't enforce laws through the court.

Just think, if Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen and he gets away with this....the door is wide open for Demoncrat corruption. Next they will ignore the electoral college and let the supreme court appoint the president in 2000 and then they will ignore convicted fraudsters connected with faulty voting machines in Ohio, overturn the legitimate count, and again appoint the president in 2004. The blood runs cold just thinking that they might some day be able to get away with this.

Oh yeah, and after that, they might start ripping up the constitution and destroying our rights. The more I think about what might happen the scarrier it gets.

[edit on 25/10/08 by Tiamanicus]

Originally posted by davion

Originally posted by daddyroo45
You know,Berg should just release all his "evidence"to the press.The tape recording of Obama's grandmother.The documentation of school records in Indonesia.Even the "evidence showing Obama used an Indonesian passport to travel to Pakistan.Let the public see the "evidence"and judge it for themselves.

I wonder why he hasn't, does HE have something to hide?

Here's my thoughts on it - his actions speak loudly and it appears that he does have something to hide. What I think though is that he sees the issue as a mere technicality, even if it is unconstitutional, because, in his heart of hearts, he has always considered himself an American and it wasn't his fault, if indeed it turns out that he was physically born in Kenya. He had no power over that and he shouldn't be faulted for that. Maybe that is what he is thinking, and he isn't quite confident enough that he can pull this over on the American public because too many of us cling to our guns, our religion, and our constitution, to allow for such things. Anyway, just a scenerio I've seen play out in my own head. It's anyone's guess really why he won't hand over the documents and get this over with if he has nothing to hide.

Originally posted by Ron Paul Girl
Here's my thoughts on it - his actions speak loudly and it appears that he does have something to hide. What I think though is that he sees the issue as a mere technicality, even if it is unconstitutional, because, in his heart of hearts, he has always considered himself an American and it wasn't his fault, if indeed it turns out that he was physically born in Kenya. He had no power over that and he shouldn't be faulted for that. Maybe that is what he is thinking, and he isn't quite confident enough that he can pull this over on the American public because too many of us cling to our guns, our religion, and our constitution, to allow for such things. Anyway, just a scenerio I've seen play out in my own head. It's anyone's guess really why he won't hand over the documents and get this over with if he has nothing to hide.

I am talking about Berg, not Obama. Berg hasn't released any of the evidence he supposedly has, he's just alluded to it in his dismissed case. So I'll ask again, why hasn't he dropped all of this evidence into the public for viewing? Does he have something to hide?

Originally posted by davion

Originally posted by TheRooster
Maybe someone with knowlege of law can explain why the judge turned down O's motion to dismiss, and then dismiss the case?

Makes one wonder if this was the judges way of avoiding the limelight, and what making history would bring to his legacy.

I don't recall him ever turning down his motion to dismiss.

The motion to dismiss was filed and that was all. I believe Berg stated on his website that he was "confident" that the motion to dismiss would be overturned, but I don't believe it ever was.

This is all I could find, it appears it was denied.

PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE, :
Plaintiff :
vs. :CIVIL ACTION NO: 08-cv- 04083
:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ET AL, :
Defendants :
ORDER
ON DEFENDANT’S, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRATIC
NATIONAL COMMITTEE’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6)
THIS CAUSE came before the United States District Court Judge, Honorable R.
Barclay Surrick on Defendant’s Barack Hussein Obama and the Democratic National
Committee’s Motion to Dismiss. Having reviewed the Motion and Plaintiff’s Opposition
to said Motion and for good cause shown, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(1) and
12(b)(6) is DENIED. It is further ORDER of this Court that the following discovery is
to be turned over to Plaintiff within three (3) days:
1. Obama’s “vault” version (certified copy of his “original” long version)
Birth Certificate; and
2. A certified copy of Obama’s Certification of Citizenship;
3. A Certified copy of Obama’s Oath of Allegiance.
IT IS SO ORDERED
Dated: September ______, 2008
______________________________
Hon. R. Barclay Surrick
United States District Court Judge
For the Eastern District of PA
BERG v. OBAMA et al Doc. 13
Dockets

[edit on 10/25/2008 by TheRooster]

If voters have to prove their eligibilty to vote on demand, then why can't we demand the same of the people we're wanting to vote for?