Fed Judge Throws Out Berg v. Obama Lawsuit? Or did he?, page 7
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 15 times


reply posted on 25-10-2008 @ 05:21 PM by davion
Originally posted by redhatty
Here is a pdf of the entire Memorandum and ruling by Judge Surrick.

This is posted on Berg's site.

Read it folks


I can barely read this. I'll wait till someone comes out with a better PDF document that isn't horribly compressed and blurry.


reply posted on 25-10-2008 @ 05:27 PM by ThatDGgirl
reply to post by kettlebellysmith



Ok, here ya go.... FEMA Executive Orders

www.theforbiddenknowledge.com...



Some people have referred to it as the "secret government" of the United States. It is not an elected body, it does not involve itself in public disclosures, and it even has a quasi-secret budget in the billions of dollars. This government organization has more power than the President of the United States or the Congress, it has the power to suspend laws, move entire populations, arrest and detain citizens without a warrant and hold them without trial, it can seize property, food supplies, transportation systems, and can suspend the Constitution.




EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.




After reading it again, I kinda wish I hadn't found it.

PS I have ZERO faith in that large group of plasmic garbage that refers to itself (AND collects PAY) as CONgress.

[edit on 25-10-2008 by ThatDGgirl]



reply posted on 25-10-2008 @ 05:31 PM by Blaine91555
reply to post by redhatty



One thing I've learned reading this thread is that you seem to be the only person who knows what you are talking about. Thank you for the education and I recommend everyone read back through your posts as you attempt to help people understand.

Thanks so much!


reply posted on 25-10-2008 @ 05:34 PM by Tiamanicus
reply to post by Blaine91555



Sure thing pop. Just tell me what I have gotten wrong so far and I would be glad to do the research needed to learn the truth.


reply posted on 25-10-2008 @ 06:05 PM by Areal51
reply to post by Fromabove



That's not a decision.

That's a PROPOSED ORDER that was filed by Berg.

It is meaningless now, because the case has been dismissed.


reply posted on 25-10-2008 @ 06:12 PM by Areal51
reply to post by JaxonRoberts



Also see: www.americasright.com...

A PDF copy of the ruling itself does not appear to be online yet.

Also see: www.abovetopsecret.com...


reply posted on 25-10-2008 @ 06:13 PM by TheRooster
Originally posted by davion
Originally posted by TheRooster
Maybe someone with knowlege of law can explain why the judge turned down O's motion to dismiss, and then dismiss the case?

Makes one wonder if this was the judges way of avoiding the limelight, and what making history would bring to his legacy.


I don't recall him ever turning down his motion to dismiss.

The motion to dismiss was filed and that was all. I believe Berg stated on his website that he was "confident" that the motion to dismiss would be overturned, but I don't believe it ever was.


This is all I could find, it appears it was denied.





PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE, :
Plaintiff :
vs. :CIVIL ACTION NO: 08-cv- 04083
:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ET AL, :
Defendants :
ORDER
ON DEFENDANT’S, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRATIC
NATIONAL COMMITTEE’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6)
THIS CAUSE came before the United States District Court Judge, Honorable R.
Barclay Surrick on Defendant’s Barack Hussein Obama and the Democratic National
Committee’s Motion to Dismiss. Having reviewed the Motion and Plaintiff’s Opposition
to said Motion and for good cause shown, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(1) and
12(b)(6) is DENIED. It is further ORDER of this Court that the following discovery is
to be turned over to Plaintiff within three (3) days:
1. Obama’s “vault” version (certified copy of his “original” long version)
Birth Certificate; and
2. A certified copy of Obama’s Certification of Citizenship;
3. A Certified copy of Obama’s Oath of Allegiance.
IT IS SO ORDERED
Dated: September ______, 2008
______________________________
Hon. R. Barclay Surrick
United States District Court Judge
For the Eastern District of PA
BERG v. OBAMA et al Doc. 13
Dockets


[edit on 10/25/2008 by TheRooster]
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



Bruins goalie Tim Thomas takes stand against U.S Government
  Posted 19 days ago with 88 member flags
Romney: "I\'m Not Concerned About the Very Poor"
  Posted 10 days ago with 73 member flags
The Girl Killed by Obama: She "never saw it coming"
  Posted 4 days ago with 62 member flags
Ron Paul In Nevada - The Caucus Is Rigged!! - w/VIDEO
  Posted 6 days ago with 60 member flags