reply to post by Spectre0o0
I suggest you read Berg's now dismissed
complaint to find out exactly where all
the nonsense you been spewing comes from. Berg ventured conspiracy. First by implication. He named as defendants, the DNC, the FEC, and, of course,
Obama.
Berg then filed an
amended complaint
about seven weeks into the court proceedings, where he added yet MORE defendants:
1. Secretary of the Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Department of State,
Bureau of Commissions, Elections and Legislation, 210 N. Office Building,
Harrisburg, PA 17120;
2. Pedro A. Cortés, Secretary of the Commonwealth, for the Pennsylvania
Department of State, located at 210 N. Office Building, Harrisburg, PA 17120;
3. The U.S. Senate, Commission on Rules and Administration, 305 Russell
Building, United States Senate, Washington D.C. 20510;
4. Diane Feinstein, Chairman, U.S. Senate, Commission on Rules and
Administration, 305 Russell Building, United States Senate, Washington D.C. 20510;
Berg screams conspiracy and by the mere fact that you support his claims, you support the conspiracy charges also. This is what the judge, Honorable
R. Barclay Surrick, said in his memorandum dismissing Berg's claim.
Various accounts, details, and ambiguities from Obama’s childhood form the basis of Plaintiff’s allegation that Obama is not a natural born
citizen of the United States. To support his contention, Plaintiff cites sources as varied as the Rainbow Edition News Letter, (id. ¶ 39), and the
television news tabloid Inside Edition (id. ¶ 45). These sources and others lead Plaintiff to conclude that Obama is either a citizen of his
father’s native Kenya, by birth there or through operation of U.S. law; or that Obama became a citizen of Indonesia by relinquishing his prior
citizenship (American or Kenyan) when he moved there with his mother in 1967. Either way, in
Plaintiff’s opinion, Obama does not have the requisite qualifications for the Presidency that the Natural Born Citizen Clause mandates. The
Amended Complaint alleges that Obama has actively covered up this information and that the other named Defendants are complicit in Obama’s
cover-up.
docs.justia.com
The conspiracy charges are completely Berg's own, and anybody else who subscribes to his claims. (Download the PDF of the judge's memorandum
dismissing the case, and highlight the term "conspiracy" to gain a deeper understanding of where Berg was going with this case.
If you do not accept or believe the certified, authenticated, substantiated, and verified documents that support that Obama was born in Hawaii, then
you are sympathetic to the claims laid out by Berg. And if you aren't, you have to believe in a conspiracy of some sort, because Obama and his
mother couldn't pull off such program that spanned nearly 50 years without the willing and able assistance of others.
So do yourself a favor and actually read the case before submitting opinions based on misinformation that has been provided by the lawyer pursuing
this case. The fact that you question Obama's citizenship is a result of Berg's public campaign to turn the tide of the elections by asserting,
without reliable evidence or proof, that Obama is an "illegal non-resident alien".
[edit on 31-10-2008 by Areal51]