Wonderfull. now US citizens have no standing to question a public servants qualifications for office. This judge needs to be impeached and disbarred. Another example of the rights of ordinary folks to redress their government reduced to nothing!

Zindo

These are both local new papers in Pennsylvania. They have beenon top of this question and suit for a few months.
Zindo

Originally posted by ZindoDoone
Wonderfull. now US citizens have no standing to question a public servants qualifications for office. This judge needs to be impeached and disbarred. Another example of the rights of ordinary folks to redress their government reduced to nothing!

Zindo

Read the other news source, it says he was barred from running now.. Whats the story here.

Looks like one was pro-Obama and the other not??? I haven't been able to find the actual document posted yet but it will be by Monday I bet!

Zindo

Originally posted by ZindoDoone
These are both local new papers in Pennsylvania. They have beenon top of this question and suit for a few months.
Zindo

This is very odd. I wouldn't be surprised if these were two competing, biased internet sources. However, in this case we're looking at what would appear to be two reliable sources. Very odd.

FYI, The Xenia Gazette is out of Xenia, OH.

I just found something very odd in one of the motions. I've seen several people post that this verification has already been taken care of by the elections commission and that all of these lawsuits are a complete waste of time. If that's the case, why did they submit the following:

"The Commission should be dismissed as a party to this case because it has no oversight over the Constitution's Presidential Qualifications Clause."

If the Federal Election Commission isn't checking the legality of candidates...who is?

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE, ::
Plaintiff :
vs. :CIVIL ACTION NO: 08-cv- 04083
:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ET AL, ::
Defendants :
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE came before the United States District Court Judge, Honorable R.
Barclay Surrick on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Having reviewed the
Motion and any response thereto and for good cause shown, it is hereby
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to F.R.C.P.
56(c) is GRANTED. This Court Declares Barack Hussein Obama a/k/a Barry Hussein
Obama a/k/a Barack Dunham a/k/a Barry Dunham a/k/a Barack Soetoro a/k/a Barry
Soetoro is not a “natural born” or “naturalized” United States citizen and is ineligible to
run for and/or serve as President of the United States. The Democratic National
Committee is hereby enjoined from naming Barack Hussein Obama, et al as the
Democratic Presidential Candidate on the ballot and both the Democratic National
Committee and Barack Hussein Obama, et al are enjoined from any further campaigning on behalf of Barack Hussein Obama, et al for Office of the Presidency. It is an ORDER of this Court that Barack Hussein Obama’s, et al name be removed from any and all ballots for the Office of the President of the United States.

BERG v. OBAMA et al Doc. 27
Dockets.Justia.com

It is further ORDER of this Court; Defendants are to pay Plaintiff $48,300.00,
representing all fees and costs associated with this suit to date.

IT IS SO ORDERED
Dated: October ______, 2008 ______________________________
Hon. R. Barclay Surrick
United States District Court Judge
For the Eastern District of PA

Let's back up a little as we're not lawyers and before we start throwing poop at each other.

This MAY be a document submitted by the plaintiff for the judge to either sign or toss out.

Does anyone know any members who are lawyers?

Originally posted by schrodingers dog

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I've seen that PDF, and if you follow the history of the case on Justia, it's very clear that what you're seeing is a typical request for a judgement. It's NOT a judgement unless signed by the Judge and court seal applied.

Keep in mind that what we are seeing on the justia site are the docs submitted by the lawyers in the case...not the judge's decisions. It is common practice for the submitting lawyer to write out a judgement, as we see here, so that the judge can just sign the judgement if that's the way he rules. The presence of this document on justia does not mean that the judge ruled that way.

I don't think the judge has ruled yet. There are no updates on Berg's site (www.obamacrimes.com) other than a notice that documents were submitted on thursday...so I don't think anything has happened.

I for one would love to see this story get some light today. I know it is Saturday and the people of the United States are desperate for change, but they need to actually see what makes up these candidates.

This is all getting out of hand, we are this close to the election and we still do not really know all that much about Senator Obama.

People love him though. Why? Because they said so, that's why. No valid reasoning or policies have been laid out by his supporters or his staff.

& No I am not voting for McCain either, but I will be voting as I love to exercise my rights here in America.