It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hurry and instate the NWO NOW !

page: 1
14
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 25 2008 @ 12:47 AM
link   
Here on ATS I read alot of 'big bad NWO' threads. Let me tell you how NWO is going to save you all. Yes, it will be a one world government. Yes, there will be certain tasks expected from you, it's contituents. Yes, there will be limitations in the luxuries we all enjoy now. Are these devastating consequences? No.

Yes, fire arm attainment will be outlawed, but have you ever thought that this may be due to the fact that the NWO will reduce if not abolish the the reasons you feel them nesascary? Yes, this new government will border between socialism and communism. Want to know why this is not such a travisty? The federal reserve will no longer be the strong hold force between the have and have not masses. Do you really think that it is a group of 'elite bankers' rooting for a global government? Laughable theory that is!

With all of the expressed intelligence that ATS'ers are so very capable of, you seem to have missed the point completely. As it sits right now, you are living, and have been living in an NWO governed society.Further, all of the 'scare tactics' used to make the NWO the center of your anger posts i.e project blue beam, Mind Control, and all others which have been implanted into the fragile human psyche, are deterents purposefully placed to sway your vision from the actual benefits one world government would instill. Everyone always poses the the question' who are NWO members'? This is the wrong question. The more valid, and more answerable question is who is holding them back, and why?

The answer to who is holding them back? Answers are endless. Every leader you actually see on TV. Bush, Cheney,C.Rice, Paulsen,Bernenke,C. Powell, J. McCain, B. Obama the list is endless. These politicians hold back the NWO. Should NWO come to power, they are moot,powerless, and as much of a pawn as you or I. But that's the game isn't it?No matter who is the appointed ruler, they come with an agenda in hand. The above mentioned individualscome with individual agendas, hence the reason Nothing ever gets accomplished in whole.

With the NWO in place, there is a unified agenda, be it good or bad. And again, good versus bad is relative to the viewer, is it not? You can never please everyone. Therefore, you may as well do what is for the greater good of the masses. This is the very premis of the(what is called by outsiders) the NWO.

In reality, the NWO is yes, as assumed, a group of wealthy people. Some of them even Masons. And to enlighten you, no, the NWO is not a mason founded ideation. The NWO founders were honestly, a group of men who, grew out of working families. There fortunes were not made overnight in any stock market scam, quite the contrary. From which comes the beliefs that the NWO brings to the table. They are not interested in alligning the worlds religious systems. All politicians have enough brains to realize that religion is the ace in the hole. A government actually benefits more from it's people's predjudice among each other i.e religion, color,trade alliance... etc, than any unity. This is because it provides a pulpit for the figure head to rally the masses against a conceivable adversary.

NWO realizes that without conflict and reasons for said conflict, we would boarder Utopia. In a time of Utopia, what purpose would we have of a directional leader? So as far as them using 'hallographic images' to scare us into a unified people who bind together I tell you Nay.

Truth be told, as my husband and I are privileged members of certain social hierarchy, a system where people are treated as people, instead of cattle, should be ushered in with warmth and welcome. Instead, it has been so distorted from it's true definition, which is public beneficiary based, It now instills fear and anger and connotations of evil world dominance.
I have skimmed through this board,and some were looking for help from space, the help is here,always has been.

See it as the blessing it is.









[edit on 25-10-2008 by 1nt3rp0l]




posted on Oct, 25 2008 @ 12:59 AM
link   
reply to post by 1nt3rp0l
 


I find your ranting quite funny.

Anyway I'll just leave you with a simple quote, because I don't want to talk about this subject matter, its been covered many times over.

"I believe that all government is evil, and that trying to improve it is largely a waste of time."
-H. L. Mencken

Go here: www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Oct, 25 2008 @ 01:09 AM
link   
The only reason to get rid of fire arms is so that the people can not defend themselves against tyranny. Outlaws are not going to turn their guns in, only citizens who have them legally and for legitimate purposes. You are asking everyone to be punished and to suffer for the actions of a few. When the government is able to take away all the guns without using guns themselves, give me a call on this topic.

And when the federal reserve is gaining more power, not losing it's power then your claim that the federal reserve will no longer be a strong hold force is just that - a baseless claim. Get rid of the federal reserve, then we can see whats what in this world as far as economics, and then we can talk about further solutions.

None of the things mentioned in your 3rd paragraph even comes close to being the reasons I'm against a NWO. You are simply doing the status quo of pointing out the topics that are percieved to be the most out there, and then painting that as what people think. It's dishonest at best, blatant propaganda at worse.

Every one of the politicians you mention are in fact in favor of a NWO. Even hitler was in favor of a NWO. They want to be in charge of an entire world government. And people like that always will. These people actively work for the NWO, and have been signing documents in secret to merge nations together. Once again, this is dishonest at best, blatant propaganda at worse.

With the NWO in place, all the power in the world will be given over to the elite. It will be sold as being for the good of the people, just as this post of propaganda you have given us does. In reality, the entire game is simply for the people to give up their authority to a central figure.

And that is what people like you don't get(if you're actually being honest here). The people who want the NWO do not care what the stipulations of getting it together are. Any excuse is fine with them. It's no different than democrats and republicans.

Let me go ahead and school you a bit here. Behind every issue there are 2 questions, not just 1. The first question is kept silent by 99% of the politicians out there. And that is - who should control the issue. The first question is always - is this a job of government to handle. The power seeking politicans will always avoid this question, and instead the "2 sides" just debate on how it will be handled with them in power. And people will sit around and argue about the 2 sides for hours upon hours and never do the people realize that no matter which way you vote, you just gave more power to the government.

Because once that power is given away, it's just a change of mind by those with power to change the direction of the issue. People gave up power over the education issue to someone they thought would do a good job. And then comes the next guy, who automatically inherits that power and does whatever he wants. "No child left behind".

If you actually do bring up that first question, you are labeled in the mainstream as a kook. As if you must be absurd for questioning if someone else should have this power over your life.

I am not stupid. I know what this is. The entire game is for you as a person to give away your authority to a central figure. Who is that central figure going to be?

Matthew 7:

28And it came to pass, when Jesus had ended these sayings, the people were astonished at his doctrine:

29For he taught them as one having authority, and not as the scribes.


In my opinion, anyone who wants to give away their authority, and thinks someone other than themselves can better manage their life, can start by revoking their right to vote. Afterall, if you believe someone else can better manage your life, then why are you suddenly smart enough to make the right decision on who to vote for?

[edit on 25-10-2008 by badmedia]



posted on Oct, 25 2008 @ 01:10 AM
link   
and of course according to Biblical prophecy, can you guess who the president of your NWO one world Government will be???? The same group you think will save everyone's arses......

Drum rolls please.......

Red carpet rolls out, spot lights, Anti-Christ walks out on the world stage.

Then my friend, you will regret the very words you have just typed, cause then you will see his wrath and vengence unleashed to such a degree that all the world wars combined looked like vacations.

You'll see ..........



posted on Oct, 25 2008 @ 01:12 AM
link   
Are you saying that everything we have read about nwo ideals is disinfo? I am not completely closed off to this thought, but every thing I have ever seen is negative pertaining to nwo. This would be the equivalent of telling everyone that Christ was bad and Satan was good.

Also they are supposed to have some satanic agenda. But you say they have no religious interests at all? Like I said, I am interested, Not a subscriber to this, but not closed to it either. One must think, it must be better than what we have now



posted on Oct, 25 2008 @ 01:21 AM
link   
reply to post by 1nt3rp0l
 
Scratches head, then rump. Asks self "Now where did I leave my flintlock", "woman, fetch me that bucket of tar" grrrrr. and mumbles as he heads out the door "Didn't we go threw this before", grrrr




posted on Oct, 25 2008 @ 01:37 AM
link   
I see it is going to be extremely difficult for you to get around the fact that none of this is religion based. How do you suppose I convince a mass of peoples like your self that the world is not flat? How do I convince a mass of people that they have been spoon fed a gourmet puree of lies to delay the inevitable? To 'rise up' against anyone who wants to take their fire arms? Or to rise against anyone who speaks against your intended and quite successful programming?

You can inject as much 'antichrist', Jesus, or 'satanic force' into this as you like if it makes it more palatable for you.

As for my before mentioned politicians being pro-NWO.... some of them may share some ideation. How ever, as far as actually putting NWO to power, they would lay in front of the wrecking ball in protest. These are your Reserve backers. They are the reason it seems you can never get ahead.

NWO is about to change that entire way of governing.

And as far as 'giving up your rights'? Apparently, it has gone without notice how your current government so easily 'ammends' the constitution at it's liesure to suit individual agendas.With the constitution so easily changed, They are not rights, they are temporary bathroom privelages.

NWO will offer something more permenent, and for the masses, not the select.



posted on Oct, 25 2008 @ 01:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by 1nt3rp0l
I see it is going to be extremely difficult for you to get around the fact that none of this is religion based. How do you suppose I convince a mass of peoples like your self that the world is not flat? How do I convince a mass of people that they have been spoon fed a gourmet puree of lies to delay the inevitable? To 'rise up' against anyone who wants to take their fire arms? Or to rise against anyone who speaks against your intended and quite successful programming?


Religion is merely a set of beliefs. You can't help but have a religion. You can just call it beliefs or what you think is true, but it is just a religion.

You don't even know my beliefs, and you pretend that I am speaking from my intended and successful programming? I am completely against the christian church. Those people running around waving the cross worship false idols. Those are the people who belong to the religion ABOUT Jesus. I myself am someone who subscribes to the religion OF Jesus. I know who and what I am.



You can inject as much 'antichrist', Jesus, or 'satanic force' into this as you like if it makes it more palatable for you.


Sorry, I don't focus on image. I focus on actions. I will know the people by their fruits(actions). It's not the "Anti-christ" I'm against. It's the actions and things that give the "anti-christ" figure it's power that I am against.

You see, I don't worship false idols. I don't focus on image. I focus on the actions, the philosophy and the understandings. And like it or not, the anti-christ is just someone who seeks to control people. If this is not the "anti-christ", then why does it fit the bill? As Dave Chapelle once said - you might not be a hooker, but you are sure as hell wearing the uniform.



As for my before mentioned politicians being pro-NWO.... some of them may share some ideation. How ever, as far as actually putting NWO to power, they would lay in front of the wrecking ball in protest. These are your Reserve backers. They are the reason it seems you can never get ahead.


People of power have long set out to control the world. And yet this is supposed to be a "new" world order? The only thing "new" about it is a long sought out accomplishment might be made.



NWO is about to change that entire way of governing.



Why don't you just say the truth here. The NWO is about to change the entire way of CONTROLLING people. To govern is to control or manage. I do not care for your new horse, I can walk on my own.



And as far as 'giving up your rights'? Apparently, it has gone without notice how your current government so easily 'ammends' the constitution at it's liesure to suit individual agendas.With the constitution so easily changed, They are not rights, they are temporary bathroom privelages.


More like the current government doesn't even follow the constitution. Ever heard of the 10th amendment? It reads it as a document of limited rights, rather than one of limited government. If it's not specifically listed, they aren't allowed to do it. But the fact they do not follow the constitution hardly justifies giving control to an even larger power who also will not follow the constitution.



NWO will offer something more permenent, and for the masses, not the select.


Oh yeah, then why does it need a central authority? Why does it need to take power away from the masses? Why does it put all the power in the entire world in less hands than we have today? Why is it we are talking about it's going to be "good" rather than talking about an actual system we can look at and examine. Oh yeah, because you are just making baseless claims.



posted on Oct, 25 2008 @ 01:54 AM
link   
The US over the past 100 years has experienced a constant centralization of power. And today our entire country is suffering as a result. Why? Because 1 man got into power over all that centralized power and RAPED the entire country.

And you expect me to believe that instead of decentralizing power, and returning the power to the people, that we should go FURTHER into centralizing the power into a 1 world centralized government? Oh yeah, I'm stupid and will go for that - NOT.

The solution of our problems is for people to realize that giving the power to the people is to decentralize power. So that they themselves have more control over their lives. Not to take the things that have screwed this country over, and do it on a larger scale. Because that is all this is about.

Did you actually think that pointing out the bad things centralized government has done is going to help you on your quest to centralize the entire worlds government? LOL

It sure is a shame when control over 1 life isn't enough for a person. Can't be happy with controlling the 1 life you got, you gotta try and control everyone else as well.


[edit on 25-10-2008 by badmedia]



posted on Oct, 25 2008 @ 02:05 AM
link   
Well stated badmedia

You tell me. What more 'power' would you as an individual want? Would you like to be a legislative figure in charge of putting laws into affect or romoving them from the same? What would your resume stating qualifications read?

Centralized government? You say this as if it is a new concept, as though you have not been living under it for all of your years... you may have heard of the U.N. E.U...etc


Do you TRULY think the New government will have an office similair to the President? It will be a cabinet. Not One leader.



posted on Oct, 25 2008 @ 02:08 AM
link   
Just a few (?) quotes from people who were a lot wiser than you...Let's start with Thomas Jefferson.
"A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor and bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government."
"All, too, will bear in mind this sacred principle, that though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will to be rightful must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights, which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression."
"Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."
"Enlighten the people generally, and tyranny and oppressions of body and mind will vanish like evil spirits at the dawn of day."
"Every generation needs a new revolution."
"Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers of the people alone. The people themselves are its only safe depositories."
"Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny."
"I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man."
"I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations which dare already to challenge our government to a trial by strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country."
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them but to inform their discretion."
"I own that I am not a friend to a very energetic government. It is always oppressive."
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it."
"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
"If there is one principle more deeply rooted in the mind of every American, it is that we should have nothing to do with conquest."
"It behooves every man who values liberty of conscience for himself, to resist invasions of it in the case of others: or their case may, by change of circumstances, become his own."
"It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself."
"Leave no authority existing not responsible to the people."
"Liberty is to the collective body, what health is to every individual body. Without health no pleasure can be tasted by man; without liberty, no happiness can be enjoyed by society."
"My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government."
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."
"No government ought to be without censors; and where the press is free no one ever will."
"Nothing is unchangeable but the inherent and unalienable rights of man."
"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual."
"Sometimes it is said that man cannot be trusted with the government of himself. Can he, then be trusted with the government of others? Or have we found angels in the form of kings to govern him? Let history answer this question."
"That government is best which governs the least, because its people discipline themselves."
"The republican is the only form of government which is not eternally at open or secret war with the rights of mankind."
"The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive."
"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
"The world is indebted for all triumphs which have been gained by reason and humanity over error and oppression."
"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty."
"To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical."
"War is an instrument entirely inefficient toward redressing wrong; and multiplies, instead of indemnifying losses."
"We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."
"Were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter."
"When a man assumes a public trust he should consider himself a public property."
"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty."
"Whenever the people are well-informed, they can be trusted with their own government."

How about some snippets of wisdom from Benjamin Franklin?
"A great empire, like a great cake, is most easily diminished at the edges."
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both."
"Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn."
"Distrust and caution are the parents of security."
"Hear reason, or she'll make you feel her."
"Honesty is the best policy."
"If a man empties his purse into his head, no man can take it away from him. An investment in knowledge always pays the best interest."
"If you would have a faithful servant, and one that you like, serve yourself.
"Rebellion against tyrants is obedience to God."
"The Constitution only guarantees the American people the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself."
"The eye of the master will do more work than both his hands."
"Tricks and treachery are the practice of fools, that don't have brains enough to be honest."
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."
"We must, indeed, all hang together or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately."
"Where liberty is, there is my country."
"Words may show a man's wit but actions his meaning."

Maybe some Thomas Paine?
"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property... Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the use of them."
"But such is the irresistable nature of truth, that all it asks, and all it wants is the liberty of appearing."
"Society in every state is a blessing, but government, even in its best stage, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one."
"He that rebels against reason is a real rebel, but he that in defence of reason rebels against tyranny has a better title to Defender of the Faith, than George the Third."
"He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from opposition; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach himself."
"He who is the author of a war lets loose the whole contagion of hell and opens a vein that bleeds a nation to death."
"It is error only, and not truth, that shrinks from inquiry."
"It is the direction and not the magnitude which is to be taken into consideration."
"Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it."
"That government is best which governs least."
"The instant formal government is abolished, society begins to act. A general association takes place, and common interest produces common security."
"The strength and power of despotism consists wholly in the fear of resistance."
"These are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman."
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
"To say that any people are not fit for freedom, is to make poverty their choice, and to say they had rather be loaded with taxes than not."
"War involves in its progress such a train of unforeseen circumstances that no human wisdom can calculate the end; it has but one thing certain, and that is to increase taxes."
"We have it in our power to begin the world over again."
"When men yield up the privilege of thinking, the last shadow of liberty quits the horizon."

Shall I go on with even more great visionaries than just these three? What of the wisdom of people like Albert Einstein? Will Rogers spoke out with a lot of truth too. Abraham Lincoln, a man reknown for his honesty, but thrust into many bad decisions & assassinated before he could correct those problems...Just like JFK who was brave enough to actually take the reigns against tyranny from the Federal Reserve Bank.

How many others must waste their wisdom on fools & show how little that NWO supporters really know of what it is they support?

[edit on 25-10-2008 by MidnightDStroyer]



posted on Oct, 25 2008 @ 02:29 AM
link   
reply to post by MidnightDStroyer
 


I will start in agreement. They were MUCH wiser than I. But there Ideals were made in a time much different than ours, and the requirements have changed.




"A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor and bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government."

And look at where the assumption of 'right' in industry/ trade has gotten us. We are Begging the inept government to print some worthless money to give us the illusion we are alright again.





Text"Every generation needs a new revolution."


Our arguement entirely




I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man



How very profound,AND From the lips of a slave owner at that!




"Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn


Agreed! However, people choose to remain ignorant to the benefit One government would bring about. One set of rules, across the board. All equal.




We have it in our power to begin the world over again



The point exactly! What we have in place does not work. Time for change.



posted on Oct, 25 2008 @ 02:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by 1nt3rp0l
Well stated badmedia

You tell me. What more 'power' would you as an individual want? Would you like to be a legislative figure in charge of putting laws into affect or romoving them from the same? What would your resume stating qualifications read?


Any that I choose to take. I live by 1 universal law. And that is I will not impose on the free will of another human. If I am imposing on the free will of another being, then I am in the wrong. This also means that I reject anything which imposes on the free will of another. Meaning, even if it is something I agree with, I do not believe it is right. For example - I am by my choice 100% against abortion. The only thing I am more against however, is a bunch of people using it as a political tool and telling a person what they can and can't do.

Government should serve 1 and only 1 person. And that is to protect the free will of the people. That is to insure and step in when someone takes away anothers free will. That would be a very limited government. For example, it was the proper role of government to step in during the civil rights to make sure black people were allowed to vote. But it is not the proper role of government to manage peoples lives, and regulate them.

The constitution of the US is written to protect the minority from the majority. While many people will bring up slavery etc, the truth is they defined what it meant to be free men. So there is no reason why we can't be free men and extend that to everyone and without slaves.



Centralized government? You say this as if it is a new concept, as though you have not been living under it for all of your years... you may have heard of the U.N. E.U...etc


It's not a new idea. The constitution and the foundation of the US was the new idea. It was based on decentralization. And ever since it was done, it has been a constant manipulation to get people to turn over their power. Always done in the name of the good, and always changed after the fact.

Decentralization is the new idea. And the only legit "NWO" will be a direction of decentralization, rather than continuing the status quo OWO of centralization. But that isn't what you are talking about when you talk about everyone turning in their guns and submitting to a world authority.

The people are the authority. Anything less will not do.



Do you TRULY think the New government will have an office similair to the President? It will be a cabinet. Not One leader.


Don't care. You think I really give a crap about GWB instead of the system that allows him to do such? Does the system of centralized power and the pains it carries with it suddenly change due to the number of people choosing to centralize the power? Do you realize that just in the house alone, we have over 450 members, and still the patriot act passed? But yet, this same function is supposed to be a safeguard? I think not.

I'm not a sheep. I don't deny ignorance, I outright attack it.



posted on Oct, 25 2008 @ 02:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by 1nt3rp0l


Text"Every generation needs a new revolution."


Our arguement entirely


No it's not. Your argument is to take the failed principles that got us into the trouble we are in today and apply it to the entire world.



The point exactly! What we have in place does not work. Time for change.


The only change you represent is in who is in charge. Do you free men? No, you enslave them to a system under the control of a few. That is not change, that is status quo.

The moment you try to tell me how to live my life, and how you will use force to do so, is the moment you failed. And believe me, you have failed.



posted on Oct, 25 2008 @ 02:40 AM
link   
reply to post by badmedia
 




Any that I choose to take.


Strong statement. And how receptive our current government is to this form of thought formation.






I'm not a sheep. I don't deny ignorance, I outright attack it.


A beautiful thought, but I see you keep the lid on your mind to realize the benefit. The first step in 'attacking' ignorance would be to lift the cap. Attempt to see outside the box of lies you have been fed about NWO.



posted on Oct, 25 2008 @ 02:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by 1nt3rp0l
Strong statement. And how receptive our current government is to this form of thought formation.


Is what you represent any different here? No. Why? Because you represent the status quo. That we must all submit to power. That authority is the truth, rather than the truth is authority. Sorry, but I know right from wrong, and no amount of power or authority can change that.

Exactly where is that change you talk of again?




A beautiful thought, but I see you keep the lid on your mind to realize the benefit. The first step in 'attacking' ignorance would be to lift the cap. Attempt to see outside the box of lies you have been fed about NWO.


Oh, so the NWO doesn't represent a 1 world government with a centralized power managing and controlling everything in the world? You tell people to "see outside the box", but at the same time you just represent another box.

Here's the basic argument. Oh the NWO is bad, they want to control everything and do bad things to people. You're argument, is = the NWO is good, they want to control everything and do good things for people.

You know what I see? A group of people who want to control things and do their will to people. So you can say "Oh but if you can just see how people can take that power for good", but as I said before, the entire game is just to get people to give up their power to another. To sell their souls, and deny the divine gift of free will. No thanks.

Feel free to quit insulting my intelligence at anytime.

[edit on 25-10-2008 by badmedia]



posted on Oct, 25 2008 @ 02:53 AM
link   
reply to post by badmedia
 



It is obvious you have a skewed vision on the implementations New government would propagate.


It would NOT socialize industry: in fact, it would enlist all that capitalism was MEANT to be. Seeing that the employee benefitted in a profit sharing/ incentive program.

It would NOT assume the property of the people.

It would NOT assume a dictatorship role.


It is to give a set of laws across the board that will make equal all men. From the highest, what you call 'the elite' to the lowest class.

Ensure healthcare equality for everyone.
Ensure no hunger.
Ensure equal education.
Ensure adequate employment.
Ensure fare trade.
Ensure alternative energy persuit.



posted on Oct, 25 2008 @ 02:53 AM
link   
reply to post by 1nt3rp0l
 


God, I've been trying to hold my tongue...

Real quickly, as another poster has already pointed-out, DECENTRALIZATION is the key to a successful and representative form of government. What works in California may not work for the people in Ohio, much less the entire country. How can a one world government represent the needs and wishes of 6 billion people across this planet? For example; how can the people of Italy "regardless" of their GOOD intentions decide for the people of Ireland that henceforth they shall not fish, drill for oil, or use certain natural resources that maybe in abundance in their community, but will FOR the betterment of the E.U. (whatever that means) use other resources that will have to be imported. By the way, this is precisely why the European Union is doomed to fail, because eventually local or regional desires will be ignored, or trampled upon.

Less centralization gives people at the local level more control on matters and issue that pertain to them most.

For all its good intentions, a one world government will bring more chaos and less freedoms, and therefore is quite contrary to its intended purpose.



[edit on 25-10-2008 by Gateway]



posted on Oct, 25 2008 @ 02:56 AM
link   



posted on Oct, 25 2008 @ 02:57 AM
link   
reply to post by 1nt3rp0l
 


Hey, I'm all for lifting the cap and hearing the benefits and dispelling the lies about a one world government. I'm seriously curious to see what you think this government will actually be.

So go for it, sell me. Explain this fantastic vision you think you understand. I'm an open minded guy, you might even convince me it's a good thing. I'm all ears (well, eyes as it were.)



new topics

top topics



 
14
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join