It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
An expert panel is advising the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to add adult smokers to the list of people that should be vaccinated against bacteria that cause pneumonia, meningitis and other diseases.
Currently the US federal agency recommendation for vaccination against pneumonia includes children the elderly, and other vulnerable groups, but a meeting in Atlanta earlier this week of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) concluded that adult smokers should be added to the list because they have a higher risk of lung and respiratory infection.
Pneumonia can result from a variety of causes, including infection with bacteria, viruses, fungi, or parasites, and chemical or physical injury to the lungs. Its cause may also be officially described as idiopathic—that is, unknown—when infectious causes have been excluded.
Originally posted by adrenochrome
good post!!
i heard about this on the radio this morning, and forgot to look up a news source this afternoon to post on ATS
my first reaction to hearing this was to wonder what exactly they're going to put in these vaccines, that are for smokers only...
i can't even trust a little flu shot anymore!
Originally posted by ghaleon12
While I wouldn't get a vaccine if I smoked, I can see sort of where they're coming from. Smokers have a disadvantaged in clearing out their lungs which increases risk for infection. The vaccine is probably against bacterial because of the clearing issue, if it was from viral that won't make too much sense. Fungal is only an issue if you have a weakened immune system, same with parasites.
Originally posted by quetzalcoatl13
You are right when you say that people don't seem to care about the rights of smokers being removed. I live in Arizona, and here it is illegal to smoke inside any building (except the casinos run by Natives) and in some cities you have to be a certain number of feet away from the entrance of any business. This is the way they condition people into accepting the removal of freedoms, by slowly going from one group to another. People who smoke cigarettes are not the majority in this country(as far as I know) so when the majority sees the rights of a minority group being removed they don't mind because they aren't included. Ultimately it isn't about who they are removing the rights of or why, it is simply the act of removing rights. If the population at large doesn't mind when one group is singled out and has their rights removed, than those people don't truly believe in the rights of free will. Thus they will not react when more and more rights are removed.
Originally posted by quetzalcoatl13
You are right when you say that people don't seem to care about the rights of smokers being removed. I live in Arizona, and here it is illegal to smoke inside any building (except the casinos run by Natives) and in some cities you have to be a certain number of feet away from the entrance of any business. This is the way they condition people into accepting the removal of freedoms, by slowly going from one group to another. People who smoke cigarettes are not the majority in this country(as far as I know) so when the majority sees the rights of a minority group being removed they don't mind because they aren't included. Ultimately it isn't about who they are removing the rights of or why, it is simply the act of removing rights. If the population at large doesn't mind when one group is singled out and has their rights removed, than those people don't truly believe in the rights of free will. Thus they will not react when more and more rights are removed.
As to the primary topic at hand, I understand adding smokers to the list of people who should get vaccines, but like another poster said it would not effectively combat pneumonia because of the various sources the disease can come from. I assume, since the panel must be medically trained, that they know this. Therefore it does not make sense to even vaccinate for something when the vaccine is only rarely efficient in preventing the disease. Add that to the fact that there have been numerous studies where vaccinations have been shown to cause diseases such as autism, and the fact that under recently enacted laws producers of vaccines cannot be sued if their vaccine does damage to or kills people, then there is something very off about all of this.
I personally do not trust our government due to the things I have seen them do and also the inherent quality of corruption in any governing body big enough to come into power. I will not ever again let them inject me with anything by choice, and I implore others to make their own decision but to be very cautious about trusting these people. They do not have your best interest in mind, they never have.