weird pics

nice colours and stuff , pretty psychedelic


aren't the rest of the pics online yet?? ....no leaks?

No, from what I have heard there may be hundreds and hundreds of pictures that are being released. However I am pretty certain this is stuff you can pick up for your self, one article described the guy going through miles of shuttle footage looking for these things. I am pretty anxious to see the pictures myself.

Another little quirk I have noticed is that the term "comet", when used by NASA, seems to cover a wider than you might suspect range of objects. It wouldnt surprise me if NASA had a secret policy to refer to any ufo as a comet. That is assuming of course that NASA is actively trying to supress knowledge of ufo's / and or aliens. One thing is for certain, it appears that the evidence is mounting that there is alot of weird stuff flying about the skies and near earth. Also, I should have made it clear, that NASA referring to a ufo as a comet does not neccessarily mean that they feel the object is an inteligently controlled space vehicle. Maybe it applies to undiscovered physical anomolies that have yet to be studied.

WOW!
Nasa can refer to them as comets, but they are not comets!

thoughs pictures are freaky

This is truly interesting.. I have watched hours and hours of NASA footage taken from the many shuttle missions.. but these are the most conclusive pictures of what looks a lot like 'Flying Saucers'.. Weather it's ET or the CIA, test flying some new secret space saucer, no one knows for sure.. My money is on E.T...

While a small percentage (as normal) could be explained away, I can`t see how NASA can explain all of them. The vast array of pictures and the form that they take say to me ET, ET, ET

I blew that up and that's a Saucer!!

i thought the bloke on the link above said that images had been "enhanced" to show the general form that these things take but not doctored

william its worth looking at the dial up on the link I put above from the blokes who got these images might take a while but mightt quell your fears of doctoring somewhat,

[Edited on 18-1-2003 by cassini]

[Edited on 18-1-2003 by cassini]

William

"Why is the pink-thing in the middle of a higher resolution than the rest of the image? It's edges are more curved and refined than the blurry, zoomed-in pixels of the rest of the image.

This image has been doctored. I guarantee it."
-------------------------------------------------------------------

You've made a good point William, but why would Nasa doctor the image? You would think Nasa would want it blurry.

Unless of course the pink object is solid and the less clear parts are something else, like fire or atmospheric disturbance? I am just guessing, I dont know where that particular picture came from. I know that alot of anomolies show up on the SOHO satelite, there are web sites on them. I also heard a critic say that some of the 'ufo's' are nothing more than ovver exposed planets... Well, I guess we will know in a week. But if it was up to me I would 'leak' all of the pictures now!

those images are really interesting. Can't wait to see all of the pictures when they're released.

I just bought a ticket for the saturday night talk. Will let you know how it all goes. You also get a 'free' cd of all the images plus more. should be interesting