It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Get off her neck, and quit whining, Obama says things that should scare the crap out you but here you are sweating the small stuff. We get it, you hate religion, you hate palin, you'll do everything you can to sensationalize everything she says pointing out how silly it is with a religious like zeal that can only be appreciated by other whining militant atheists, gay activists, most liberals etc Blah Blah Blah
Get over it you're doing the same thing pushing YOUR point as well the only difference is SHE has made it all the way to being a Mayor, who did so well they wanted her to be Governor Of Alaska while you're still talking like someone who has all the business acumen of the employee of the month at meat on a stick at your local malls food court.
Get off her neck, and quit whining
Obama says things that should scare the crap out you
but here you are sweating the small stuff
We get it, you hate religion, you hate palin, you'll do everything you can to sensationalize everything she says pointing out how silly it is with a religious like zeal that can only be appreciated by other whining militant atheists, gay activists, most liberals etc Blah Blah Blah
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
It's against the law. Again, we have laws that control the idea of religion in government. Do you disagree with the idea of seraration of church and state? Thanks.
ColoradoJens
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
It's against the law. Again, we have laws that control the idea of religion in government. Do you disagree with the idea of seraration of church and state? Thanks.
ColoradoJens
Yes I disagree with it because I know the history of how the separation powers came to be and that she has just as much right to her religious expression as you have a right not to fear her religious views won't be made into a state Religion, you know,, sort of like Darwin's Evolution has become for Atheists.
I think the Government goes too far when they take down WW ll landmarks of a Giant Cross or the ten commandments and many other traditional icons of our Nations history whether they are "no longer in style" for many or those that whine saying things like that offend them but if you don't like the websites pics of their lesbian lovers latest my space pic wearing her Bimbo in Bondage latex and Playtex, you are told to just close your eyes if it bothers you.
I see the separation powers being used by the ACLU to keep any conservative voice from having any say at all because where ever you get your frame of reference, what ever becomes your standard of truth whether you read it in the Bible and it makes sense to you and you believe it, OR you get it out of the latest "New Woman" magazine or from one of the girls at your last "power lunch" it doesn't mean someone who thinks Marriage should be only between a man and a woman,is because it is religion but it will be INSISTED upon that is what it is by Gays.
It shouldn't matter if someone DID develop their philosophical views from reading books but as long as that book isnt the BIBLE! I mean you can believe in any God you want, they tell us, AS LONG AS IT ISN'T THAT ONE NAMED JESUS!
I am already having images flashing in my mind of Sam Harris taking such a frivolous law suit all the way to the supreme court with the ACLU there making sure he has his rights to freedom of speech protected but my speech had the word God in it which means religious which means I can't say it because we were in the Motor Vehicles Dept and that is Government employees there and yata yata .
The separation of Church and State is not even mentioned in the constitution and you know it and you know how it got there but you will use a stretch of Jefferson's letter to the Danbury Baptists to mean what we have today. Now I don't have a problem with Church and State, in fact I am counting on it protecting us when Muslims say it doesn't say Mosque and State and want to install Sharia Law here as they did in the UK.
HOWEVER,, I think I see people talking about this as much as you have been and I think your fears are for the most part, baseless .
ex]
No, no Jefferson. How about a couple statements from James Madison, the "Father of the Constitution"
Strongly guarded as is the separation between religion and & Gov't in the Constitution of the United States the danger of encroachment by Ecclesiastical Bodies, may be illustrated by precedents already furnished in their short history (Detached Memoranda, circa 1820).
You also at first stated you disagree with the separation powers and then now you say you want them to keep out the Muslims. You can't have it both ways. It is the will of the people, not God (s).
ColoradoJens
[edit on 24-10-2008 by ColoradoJens]
Originally posted by nyk537
Palin isn't trying to push her beliefs on anyone, so why worry about it?
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
It doesn't matter what religion.
But if an Athiest or New Ager or whoever else gets in office they will not change the constitution (To Include homosexual marriages,humanistic experimenting on humans and animals,cloneing and GOD Knows whatever else ) ...and they will not push any liberal ideas down anyones throats in speeches or in passing bills etc right >?They are all just gonna sit around and sing cumbya ...and or course invite all of the Evangelicals or Christians to come on up to the white house and eat a steak with ya right ? ....yeah ok.
Is that right ?Because thats what I am seeing on these threads ..double standards ...and one accusing the other of doing something that the other wants to do ..Is this jealousy or what ?
The civil Government, though bereft of everything like an associated hierarchy, possesses the requisite stability, and performs its functions with complete success, whilst the number, the industry, and the morality of the priesthood, and the devotion of the people, have been manifestly increased by the total separation of the church from the State. (Letter to Robert Walsh, Mar. 2, 1819).
Every new and successful example, therefore, of a perfect separation between the ecclesiastical and civil matters, is of importance; and I have no doubt that every new example will succeed, as every past one has done, in showing that religion and Government will both exist in greater purity the less they are mixed together.
I must admit moreover that it may not be easy, in every possible case, to trace the line of separation between the rights of religion and the civil authority with such distinctness as to avoid collisions and doubts on unessential points. The tendency to a usurpation on one side or the other or to a corrupting coalition or alliance between them will be best guarded against by entire abstinence of the government from interference in any way whatever, beyond the necessity of preserving public order and protecting each sect against trespasses on its legal rights by others. (Letter Rev. Jasper Adams, Spring 1832 & Letter to Edward Livingston, July 10, 1822).
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Article Six establishes the Constitution, and the laws and treaties of the United States made in accordance with it, to be the supreme law of the land, and that "the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, any thing in the laws or constitutions of any state notwithstanding." It also validates national debt created under the Articles of Confederation and requires that all federal and state legislators, officers, and judges take oaths or affirmations to support the Constitution. This means that the states' constitutions and laws should not conflict with the laws of the federal constitution and that in case of a conflict, state judges are legally bound to honor the federal laws and constitution over those of any state.
Article Six also states "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States."
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
[
Please explain how your story about some guy behind a tree in the Koran relates to this. Islam existed in 1787. Also, it's pretty weak to say yours is a kind and benevolent God only when in your own Bible, I think HE did some pretty upsetting things...
I think the difference is that I understand that the founding fathers of this country were a lot smarter than me - or you.
ColoradoJens