Originally posted by Skyfloating
Experience is a different kind of proof...not needy of peer-reviewed approval, but a personal subject.
If you can't decipher and understand what your experience REALLY is because you lack the knowledge of your reality, then you will develop
When I love someone... do I need proof for that?
When I have sex... I have an experience that needn't be proven or measured.
Sex is replicable and available for all of us to see, test, etc. I'd give you some good links, but I'm certain they're against the T&C
I see and touch a tree...I DON'T UNDERSTAND how a tree is made or built...but don't need to understand it and don't need proof that it
So what you're saying is that you experience existence ignorantly, that's what I've been saying, and that's why people like you make the loose
arguments that you do based on nothing but speculation.
You can't tell me how the tree works, how it's made, how it's built or why, yet you attempt to lecture me on the issue.
And you do need proof that the tree exists so that you can experience it. The only way to consciously experience the tree as you do as a Human is to
have senses that do so.
Also, I can go outside and touch a tree, you can go outside and touch a tree, none of us can go outside and touch an alien, none of us can go outside
and fly to the plaeidies, there's a difference here.
Maybe when you understand how the tree works and why, you'll recognize a little bit more about why you breathe. Then when you learn about the
barometric bars and how they cause wind, you'll understand why the tree is strong, sturdy, and is well rooted. After that you might question why
there is soil, then you'll see a worm and begin to scientifically study it and what it does and why.
Maybe when you begin to understand your experience you'll realize why proof is not only important, but essential. You are the tree, and if you don't
know the tree, you don't know yourself, and if you don't know yourself, then who are you, and why? You're your knowledge of the tree.
It's better for you to know your experience than to wildly speculate on subjectively fathomed ideas. Metaphorically your thread is about the tree,
but you're not actually dealing with what we know and don't know about the tree in your O.P., nor are people like GhostZero (is that the member's
name?), we're just making speculations about the tree, saying it grows not because of light and competition, not because of soil, water, carbon
dioxide and photosynthesis, not because of centrioles deep within the plant cell, not because of cytoplasm or a nucleus, not because of reticulums
orthe packaging and processing of micromolecules through the golgi, not the plasmodesmata, the chloroplast, the plasma membrane, peroxisome, vacuole,
and so on, you get the picture. If not, then here.
Basic Configuration of a Plant Cell
We are treating extra-terrestrials as if they are a figment of our imagination. We take what we hear about grays, Andromedans, plaeidians,
zetareticulins (grays) etc, and we repeat it without any merit or verification, without any proof or study. Then we make up outlandish methodologies
for contacting that NEVER works, that only leads the subjective thinking into becoming a deluded, split personality, peaceful psychotic ward
You know who the world will listen to and how this will all end? The people or peoples that build that craft and go to that planet and unite worlds
through material, just like everything else has ever been proven and will continue to be proven. Not the armchair self proclaimed conspiracy theorist
that blabbers off into a dissenting rainbow filled rant of half truths and pseudo-psychological bait and hooks for the fish that bite.
So, indeed, there is no proof for any of this. But nowhere do I make the claim to provide proof.
I'm going to take your word on that for now, please don't let me find you stating somewhere that this is for certain. And then what the hell is all
of this about? If there is no proof for any of this, then why did you start a thread titled "Tuning in to Extra-terrestrial Contact"?
By the looks of the subsequent posts by other users (I know, they aren't yours) and your opening O.P. along with some of your replies, it doesn't
appear that you're driving a fine line on only being interested in opening people up to the idea. It's gone far beyond that now.
You need to get your priorities straight, your logic cleaned up, your facts in line with proof and your proof introduced. Because the claims made by
you and some other users require proof. Such as: Where extra-terrestrials reside, etc. Long night, I'm tired. Maybe I'll see ya in the morning. Take