It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
....We also know that minimizing a population must target women, not men. Only by reducing the number of females can you reduce the amount of offspring. One man can fertilize thousands of women. One woman can not be fertilized by thousands of men....
In 1972, another commission, The Rockefeller Commission on Population Growth, completed a two years study on population growth, on request of then President Nixon. The commission concluded:
"After two years of concentrated effort, we have concluded that, in the long run, no substantial benefits will result from further growth of the Nation's population, rather that the gradual stabilization of our population through voluntary means would contribute significantly to the Nation's ability to solve its problems. We have looked for, and have not found, any convincing economic argument for continued population growth. The health of our country does not depend on it, nor does the vitality of business nor the welfare of the average person".
Just two years later, in 1974, came the well known Henry Kissinger National Security Study Memorandum 200 about "the consequences of the global population growth for the US security and overseas interests".
The memo states that:
• We have unprecedented growth rates
• Lesser Developed Countries are growing faster
• Required US imports could be threatened
• Risk of global destabilization
• Urgent immediate measures must be taken to reduce fertility.
And the memo recommends these goals:
• Zero rate growth in the developed countries by 1985.
• Zero rate growth in Lesser Developed Countries by 2000....
Concerning the tools, the memo lists:
• Reproductive health (abortion, condoms)
• Sex education
• Improved health
• Women' equality
• Day care
• Government participation
• Improve social security
• Reduce infant mortality....
I don't think they are targeting just women, men are being target too, if not by vaccines by toxins in the food supply and the water.
Encouraging sexual responsibility instead would go billions of miles towards reducing the population if that's indeed what they want.
Originally posted by jakyll
The commission concluded:
"After two years of concentrated effort, we have concluded that, in the long run, no substantial benefits will result from further growth of the Nation's population, rather that the gradual stabilization of our population through voluntary means would contribute significantly to the Nation's ability to solve its problems.
Originally posted by justamomma
uhm, aren't women the ones pushing for the right to not produce? I would feel sorry for my fellow gender except that I think that we have brought this on ourselves (when I say ourselves, I don't mean me ... I love children and would love to have been eve, able to produce and raise as I saw fit).
Originally posted by justamomma
...let nature run its course.
Let Nature take its course! Nature has a way to handle overpopulation & we (humanity as a whole, that is) have been violating the Laws of Nature for far too long.
Stop medicines altogether.