Originally posted by typenicknamehere
"what you are about to witness is the most extrodinary video or a hoax"
"If you believe it, what you are seeing appears to be 2 entity's aboard the craft"
Nearly 9pm that night, I saw a quick promo for that news story on the late news with Sandra Sully. Too tired, I couldn't be stuffed sitting up to
watch it, so I went to bed.
Dude, I don't believe a word of it. Look at the part I clipped from your quote... As serious as Sandra was (she's never animated, anyway) she was
reading from a script.
When they introduce a story as being either "event A" or "event B", they leave themselves with no middle ground for events C, D, etc... I've
seen better stories on the TV lately than that one, as the other stories don't present the initial dichotomy, where you must choose to believe it or
not.
I don't buy it and I think it's a load of crap. They're TELLING us, through Sandra, that it's either real or fake - but they offer no proof that
it is real. It's a fairly weak attempt to sway some opinion, or acting like the reporting is unbiased but in no way does it amount to anything
approaching disclosure. I bet they would be having an off-air giggle, knowing that they just pulled one over the sheeple viewers.
While appearing to be 'neutral' or even 'favourable' to the story, Channel 10 have merely dangled a knowingly false carrot in front of some
suckers.
When they KNOW that they have the real deal, it won't be breaking news at 10.30pm... it will cut live into whatever show they are currently running
and it will stay on screen for as long as the ratings remain higher than Channel 7, 9, 2 and SBS.