Warnings from world leaders all within 72 hours, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 79 times


reply posted on 23-10-2008 @ 07:58 AM by dariousg
Originally posted by TH3ON3
At first I thought it was taken out of context since that is the first day of the new presidential administration taking over, but upon further study of his movements and speech while making the statement it could be something he already knows about.

Notice his raising of eyebrows which usually means the person is trying to stress how important what he is saying is, and then his folding of his hands and interlocking his fingers twice into the hope/prayer position which could mean something very bad that he hopes divine providence will get us through, or the collective community working together will get through it he hopes.

The first if he is a man of faith, and the second if he isn't.


First, I'll admit that I was listening to Rush. Anyway, yesterday, Rush was all over this. Saying that if McCain was elected he wouldn't be tested. Then he went on to say that Biden was included in a 'need to know' meeting that obviously discussed this and that he is the kind of guy that has to toot his own horn. That he learned of this attack and had to let people know that he KNEW something.

Then Rush made another statement while addressing the concerns of a caller about the polls showing Obama leading. She said that she hopes (something like this) that in the next election, if Obama wins, that we (the republicans) would get the office back.

Then Rush goes on to say exactly what many 'CTers' here have been saying about Bush. That there would be a very REAL chance that the elections would be cancelled due to a crisis if Obama gets into office and that he would remain there until the crisis clears. He was insinuating that it wouldn't ever clear and that a dictator would be established.

Well, this just confirms that this guy is a hypocrit. I mean seriously, he gets all pissed off when people bring up other CTs about this current administration (even the one he just portrayed Obama as pulling off). It's the typical BS of the 'TWO SIDED' party system. Anything that makes the other side look bad is okay and NOT CT. But if it is thrown at your party it is plain and simply a BS CT.

Joke.


reply posted on 23-10-2008 @ 08:34 AM by JustMy2Cents
Originally posted by undo
reply to
post by JustMy2Cents



by who? and for what end goal?

and how do you know this?


I only have partial answers, but it isn't in anyone's best interest for me to share them too early; especially since this can not be prevented, and there is very little anyone can do now to prepare for the aftermath. I will wait till AFTER the event to share the little that I know. In truth, the information will be more helpful to you AFTER. I'll continue posting warnings, and as the day approaches, I'll get louder. These warnings will provide credibility for me for when I do finally tell all.


reply posted on 23-10-2008 @ 08:37 AM by alienesque
this is also interesting:

news.bbc.co.uk...

does the bbc maybe know something AGAIN?



reply posted on 23-10-2008 @ 08:49 AM by kettlebellysmith
reply to post by Myrtales Instinct


I don't believe Israel will wait until after the inaguration to attack Iran. If Obama is elected, Israel will attack Iran shortly after the election, while Bush, who is an ardent supporter of Israel, is still in office. And the troops we have in Iraq will be in a position to back Israel's play.
Israel believes, as do I, that they have a right to exist. They are surrounded by countries that are determined to see the Jews wiped off the face of the earth. The United States and Great Britian are aligned with Israel in assuring there will never be another holocaust.


reply posted on 23-10-2008 @ 08:50 AM by 04326
Originally posted by nfotech
Please make a note of this post because I am supremely confident I am correct.

An action is planned for January 21 / 22nd, most likely the launch of an attack, maybe the long promised bombing of Iran, (high probability, I know everyone predicts this constantly, I have not until now).

Here are the variables which led me to this conclusion:

1. Bush signs executive order transferring presidential office immediately at soonest possible date.
2. Various world leaders are briefed in meetings via US State Dept, Vice President and as a side item during the global finance talks.
3. Very secret meetings in obscure locations of high level US and "allied" military commanders.
4. Statements being made per the subject of this thread.

This is big, whatever it ends up being. I won't theorize on the possible reasons as to why they plan to wait until after the new president takes office. Perhaps the planned action will "go over" better in the perception of various parties if someone other than Bush and Cheney are in command.

War is coming, history proves this when economies collapse. Perhaps the long postulated attack on Iran, Pakistan, Lebanon (choose one or all) can now take place with a UN, NATO or "Coalition" force.

Perhaps the crash of various economies made an unpopular action possible. Quite a few countries would be looking for a war at this point based on historic precedence.

I sincerely hope I'm wrong. I can't say if the attack on Iran is something we actually need to do or not. I would prefer peace, of course but history shows us that is not always possible and often war occurs in order to continue a well worn but very successful cycle under the direction of the elite.



funny you should mention that because i spent all afternoon thinking the same thing and trying to research the real reason behind wwII and it's involvement in ending the great depression. The say wars end economic downturns better than anything. People may say whatever they say about the great depression not being ended by the start of wwII - but the way i see it, when your neighbour loses his job its a recession but when you lose your job, its a depression. What better way to get things moving again than a mass draft where there is some money coming in to feed the wife & kids.

I wasn't entirely sure how long things were going to go south with the financial crises before something was done - but something definately needed to be done. I hope i was not the only one who noticed the markets continuing to slide even after the bailout for two weeks. Then all of a sudden we had a week of silence in the MSM and the stuff that was reported was painted wayyyyyy more positively this time around.... and then we are all of a sudden distracted by the whole ufo thing late last week and this week - all the while high level secret meetings were held and a day or so later there were all these warnings...

what really intrigues me is that prime minister rudd (australia) seems to be a level headed guy who even went on national television on sunday night to 'address the nation' and assured us that everything is fine - and shortly after he is warning of things to come... something smells fishy.


reply posted on 23-10-2008 @ 08:52 AM by tsloan
reply to post by dariousg



Rush is a blithering idiot...first and fore most.
This is once again a last ditch effort to forecast any thing that the two political parties can say "We warned you about this"...Political forecasting a broad case of events that in theory could happen? No more no less.... This is political worst case scare tactics for those who have political wieght in the communities. It's like the generals preparing his sargents to have the troops ready..only in mental theory. By stating events and forecasting he is trying to get community leaders to fall in line with the government so the anti -government rift doesn't bleed to wide and political fall out occure over any events. It's all B.S..... nothing is going to happen. The governments is going to create these type of theory events to keep its political local leaders in the black about what the upper leaders may or may not know.




reply posted on 23-10-2008 @ 09:01 AM by JustMy2Cents
Originally posted by kettlebellysmith
reply to
post by Myrtales Instinct


I don't believe Israel will wait until after the inaguration to attack Iran. If Obama is elected, Israel will attack Iran shortly after the election, while Bush, who is an ardent supporter of Israel, is still in office. And the troops we have in Iraq will be in a position to back Israel's play.
Israel believes, as do I, that they have a right to exist. They are surrounded by countries that are determined to see the Jews wiped off the face of the earth. The United States and Great Britian are aligned with Israel in assuring there will never be another holocaust.



This is the catalyst: Israel has already informed the U.S. that it has INTENTIONS of attacking Iran. However, they will not get the opportunity. A pre-emptive strike from Iran's proxies in Syria will change the direction of things.


reply posted on 23-10-2008 @ 09:04 AM by kettlebellysmith
reply to post by PhotonEffect

The General makes one serious mistake in his estimate. Afghanistan has never been pacified, and never will be, unless you nuke it into a parking lot. And even then I'm not so sure that some of those tribes wouldn't survive anyway!


reply posted on 23-10-2008 @ 09:14 AM by skeptic_al
reply to post by ballast



Two words decsribe this:

PreEmptive FUD



reply posted on 23-10-2008 @ 10:08 AM by mind is the universe
Originally posted by kettlebellysmith
reply to
post by Myrtales Instinct


I don't believe Israel will wait until after the inaguration to attack Iran. If Obama is elected, Israel will attack Iran shortly after the election, while Bush, who is an ardent supporter of Israel, is still in office. And the troops we have in Iraq will be in a position to back Israel's play.
Israel believes, as do I, that they have a right to exist. They are surrounded by countries that are determined to see the Jews wiped off the face of the earth. The United States and Great Britian are aligned with Israel in assuring there will never be another holocaust.




No offence to the troops, but it is sheeple who fight these wars. If more American troops are sent over to fight in Iran? What are the troops doing in Iraq. Sure why not more people die for more wars!!! Really this world better wake up fast, and see what is exactly happening right here now.


Who are they fighing for.
Sure more troops, more of them will be dead,
More troops, more of the other's dead.
More troops and more of the innocents are dead.
More troops for you to die.

Who were they fighting for? Them or the other's or those over there.

If the elites want a war that they called themselves for us to fight, let them for fight for it. Why should we fight wars, we didn't call for. Let them talk the talk, and walk the walk. Things are gonna change now Waving at the elites and the people who work for these governments.

If your gonna talk, walk it.


People certainly don't fight these stupid wars. Sheeple do.




[edit on 23-10-2008 by mind is the universe]
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



Alaska: Samantha Koenig Kidnapped last week.
  Posted 2 days ago with 111 member flags
Blue Spheres Fall from the Sky in the UK
  Posted 14 days ago with 81 member flags
The Chinese have seen the dragon in the sky !!
  Posted 1 days ago with 66 member flags
Strange Sounds in Sky Explained by Scientists
  Posted 11 days ago with 59 member flags
She Dialed 911. The Cop Who Came to Help Raped Her.
  Posted 4 days ago with 49 member flags
Anonymous: Revealing The Arcane Legal Trick Behind ACTA
  Posted 11 days ago with 42 member flags
Anonymous reveals Haditha massacre emails | RT
  Posted 6 days ago with 33 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Stop Bashing Us Military Folks.
  Rant, Posted 16 hours ago, 189 replies
Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 12 hours ago, 107 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 7 hours ago, 80 replies