Originally posted by TH3ON3
At first I thought it was taken out of context since that is the first day of the new presidential administration taking over, but upon further study of his movements and speech while making the statement it could be something he already knows about.

Notice his raising of eyebrows which usually means the person is trying to stress how important what he is saying is, and then his folding of his hands and interlocking his fingers twice into the hope/prayer position which could mean something very bad that he hopes divine providence will get us through, or the collective community working together will get through it he hopes.

The first if he is a man of faith, and the second if he isn't.

First, I'll admit that I was listening to Rush. Anyway, yesterday, Rush was all over this. Saying that if McCain was elected he wouldn't be tested. Then he went on to say that Biden was included in a 'need to know' meeting that obviously discussed this and that he is the kind of guy that has to toot his own horn. That he learned of this attack and had to let people know that he KNEW something.

Then Rush made another statement while addressing the concerns of a caller about the polls showing Obama leading. She said that she hopes (something like this) that in the next election, if Obama wins, that we (the republicans) would get the office back.

Then Rush goes on to say exactly what many 'CTers' here have been saying about Bush. That there would be a very REAL chance that the elections would be cancelled due to a crisis if Obama gets into office and that he would remain there until the crisis clears. He was insinuating that it wouldn't ever clear and that a dictator would be established.

Well, this just confirms that this guy is a hypocrit. I mean seriously, he gets all pissed off when people bring up other CTs about this current administration (even the one he just portrayed Obama as pulling off). It's the typical BS of the 'TWO SIDED' party system. Anything that makes the other side look bad is okay and NOT CT. But if it is thrown at your party it is plain and simply a BS CT.

Joke.

Just a thought,

If Iran backed by Russia and China were to strike at Israel, they would also have to strike at US forces in Iraq, Afganastan and other pockets in the area that contain US troops. They would also need to strike at the US Navy in the Gulf. This removes the US influence and any chance of a military strike from the US in the area.

It would be very unpopular for a president to "back off" if US troops were killed anywhere in the world. It would cause civil unrest.

..like I said, just a thought.

[edit on 23-10-2008 by son of PC]

Originally posted by nfotech
Please make a note of this post because I am supremely confident I am correct.

An action is planned for January 21 / 22nd, most likely the launch of an attack, maybe the long promised bombing of Iran, (high probability, I know everyone predicts this constantly, I have not until now).

Here are the variables which led me to this conclusion:

1. Bush signs executive order transferring presidential office immediately at soonest possible date.
2. Various world leaders are briefed in meetings via US State Dept, Vice President and as a side item during the global finance talks.
3. Very secret meetings in obscure locations of high level US and "allied" military commanders.
4. Statements being made per the subject of this thread.

This is big, whatever it ends up being. I won't theorize on the possible reasons as to why they plan to wait until after the new president takes office. Perhaps the planned action will "go over" better in the perception of various parties if someone other than Bush and Cheney are in command.

War is coming, history proves this when economies collapse. Perhaps the long postulated attack on Iran, Pakistan, Lebanon (choose one or all) can now take place with a UN, NATO or "Coalition" force.

Perhaps the crash of various economies made an unpopular action possible. Quite a few countries would be looking for a war at this point based on historic precedence.

I sincerely hope I'm wrong. I can't say if the attack on Iran is something we actually need to do or not. I would prefer peace, of course but history shows us that is not always possible and often war occurs in order to continue a well worn but very successful cycle under the direction of the elite.

funny you should mention that because i spent all afternoon thinking the same thing and trying to research the real reason behind wwII and it's involvement in ending the great depression. The say wars end economic downturns better than anything. People may say whatever they say about the great depression not being ended by the start of wwII - but the way i see it, when your neighbour loses his job its a recession but when you lose your job, its a depression. What better way to get things moving again than a mass draft where there is some money coming in to feed the wife & kids.

I wasn't entirely sure how long things were going to go south with the financial crises before something was done - but something definately needed to be done. I hope i was not the only one who noticed the markets continuing to slide even after the bailout for two weeks. Then all of a sudden we had a week of silence in the MSM and the stuff that was reported was painted wayyyyyy more positively this time around.... and then we are all of a sudden distracted by the whole ufo thing late last week and this week - all the while high level secret meetings were held and a day or so later there were all these warnings...

what really intrigues me is that prime minister rudd (australia) seems to be a level headed guy who even went on national television on sunday night to 'address the nation' and assured us that everything is fine - and shortly after he is warning of things to come... something smells fishy.

I see a couple of things with this information.

1. There is no threat. It is just the fear/control mechanism at work. So many leaders all sprouting off the same page. Keep us in fear of the dreaded Terrorists so we stay controlled and eager for out leaders protection.

2. There really is a threat, but its not what we are made to believe. No Terrorists as such, of the Middle Eastern variety, more so another "9/11" type scenario and they are preparing the masses for its eventual outcome.

In all probability its a mixture of both. Keep us in fear, keep us under psychological bondage so we will gladly give away our rights. Throw in a major "event" every few years just to keep the fear real and fresh in everyone's minds.

Could be nothing more than us pushing into Pakistan to remove the actual terrorist threat. Perhaps Obama plans to immediately put his plan into action, for finally finishing the job.

Originally posted by fleabit
Could be nothing more than us pushing into Pakistan to remove the actual terrorist threat. Perhaps Obama plans to immediately put his plan into action, for finally finishing the job.

the terrorists are not in pakistan..they are in the us government..al qaida does not exist..bin laden is dead...

[edit on 23-10-2008 by alienesque]

Originally posted by TH3ON3
Just what is the significance of January 21-22. Anyone have any info on whether or not it is an anniversary of some bad terrorist attack.

Jan 20th is when Obama would be sworn in, if he were to be elected. so, 21st or 22nd would be one to two days after.

------------------edit------------------

oops. i guess i should read the entire thread first. sorry if it has been mentioned.

[edit on 23-10-2008 by JSR]

Originally posted by JustMy2Cents
MARK THIS FOR FUTURE REFERENCE !

The imminent threat is against the United Nations headquarters in NYC.
I don't know who the plotters are, nor do I know what the weapon will be, but I do know they are waiting now only for the next UN Summit at the Heads-Of-State level. The goal is the complete removal of the UN, and certain state powers. The day which is coming was planned a VERY VERY long time ago; and now that it's finally here, nothing and no one is going to stop it from coming.

WARNING ! ! ! ! !

Keep an eye on the news for an emergency summit in NYC. Do NOT be in NYC whenever Bush is in NYC ! ! ! ! !

OK.


What should we do now run? Maybe you run, cus your doing that really well,


see if we the people follow!