Warnings from world leaders all within 72 hours

reply to post by citizen smith

---

The Muslins nuke the Jewish religious capital. The Jews will nuke the Muslin religious capital. "An Eye for an eye'" or "Measure for Measure". The Israelis have made it clear to the Arabs if Jerusalem is destroyed by any Muslin nation. Mecca will be destroyed by Israel.

[edit on 4-11-2008 by PGTWEED]

reply to post by PGTWEED

---

The problem is that if Israel carry out the threat of a bomb-run on any of Iran's nuclear research facilities, there will be a retaliatory attack, more than likely, Dimona, as a proportional response.

But to attack Mecca as an escalation of such a scenario is to deliberately target the spiritual heart of Islam and in all probability mean that no-one of Israeli nationality or of Jewish faith would be safe from personal reprisal

Also, a strike by Israel on Saudi soil would seal the fate of the US/EU in terms of oil supplies, crippling already unstable economies.

such a chain of events is pure speculation, but neither side is daft enough to even consider actually taking such a step.

reply to post by citizen smith

---

Syria has its heavy armoured, artillery and commando units are massed along the southern Lebannon and Northern Israel. The Syrians want an apology from the US (Knowing they won't get it) for the recent raid into Syria or they will respond by most likely attacking Israel. The Lebanese have found an 'alleged link' between Israel and the assassination of Mugniyeh. That supposed link could be the pretext Syria, Hezzbollah, Tehran need to attack Israel. What makes you think Israel will launch a pre-emptive strike? Israel nuking Mecca WILL BE THE RETALITORY STRIKE! Then the Arabs will give the Western Nations a choice: Support Them or Israel?

[edit on 4-11-2008 by PGTWEED]

[edit on 4-11-2008 by PGTWEED]

To strike at Jerusalem is attacking the spiritual heart of Judaism!

reply to post by PGTWEED

---

I find it hypocritical that both the United States and Israel can attack sovereign nations in the name of peace.

When one acts in this manner it brings attention upon themselves. Has Israel not learned anything from history?

The nation that does wrong in the eyes of God receives a response that is not seen for many generations.

The message of Jesus solves the issue, in that of Love on Another.

When mankind abandons his love of power, and embraces the power of love, then we will see peace on earth.

[edit on 4-11-2008 by HIFIGUY]

reply to post by HIFIGUY

---

Unfortunately, not all members of the Human Race want to love one another. In the case of the Gentile Nations and Israel. " It is better to have a strong Israel. Than a million auschwitz's the World loves." "In times of Peace. Prepare for War."

The auswitchs of the world if visited upon a single man in the name of justice but perpetuated by an unjust cause are wrong.

In times of peace, maintain the peace, and admonish those who love war.

For war and oppression breeds unrest, and when there is unrest, there is change.

Be loving as your Father in heaven is loving. Be perfect as your Father in heaven is perfect. And Love one another, as your brother under the Father has asked.

It is in ALL loving one another, that we can see a better way, and a more just path. The road is long, but the road is right. And it is doing the right thing, the path of righteousness is achieved.

What is right? Merely ask yourself of that will which you empowered, should it be empowered upon yourself, would you be happy?

There is only one will. Goodwill.

We all wish for Love. It is the mandating of ways and policy, of lifestyle and standard by which we all understand that which is best for ourselves.

Turn not your iron into sword, but to plows. Sow not your money into hate.
Water each according to his need, and prosper a way which is best for all.

Neither communism or capitalsim. Socialism or democracy alike.

It is altruism which is best for all. A universal unity, and a prosperity for the common man regardless of nation.

Man and Woman, regardless of nation or race. We are a people.

Is it so difficult to love one another? Or is it easier to love a policy or ideology.

There is one that died for all; knowing and unknown. His death for some, was the unknown salvation for all, and to others the undeniable.

Let it be known, that Love one another is the command. And that all mankind doing so falls upon a foundation of stone of which cannot be destroyed.

Today, of all days, is a better day then yesterday.

As a common man, in the name of Love I call upon you.

Peace


[edit on 5-11-2008 by HIFIGUY]

reply to post by HIFIGUY

---

For G-D so loved the World (Gentile Nations) that He gave them His only begotten Son (Israel) that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish but have everlastingly life. When Israel was a child, I loved Him and brought My Son out of Egypt. Israel is the Son of G-D, who unfortunately the Gentile Nations would rather see destroyed than be the light of their salvation. As it is written, 'All Gentile Nations will despise Israel'. It is better to have a strong Israel the World despises. Than a Million Aushwitzs the World loves.

I got this to say to those who might think that Obama won't carry on the tradition of the past presidents over the past 30 years. Wait till he gets the Intelligence briefings and see what his tune is after he gets the real truth. I'll bet you he'll fall right in line with all our recent President's including Clinton. And if you think that Clinton was a tried and true liberal pasifist the only reason he cut the Defense funding and closed bases was because our military was restructring from the post effects of the fall of the Soviet Union and the ending of the cold war. That's reality and what ever happens will be because of what Intelligence he gets from whatever cabinet he creates as well as from Intelligence from CIA,NSA,FBI, and whatever agency in between. Maybe that's what Biden was referring to because Obama will be President after he those January dates. And everyone will be trying to test him including his cabinet,congress,senate,etc not just foreign powers.

Was that regarding the WMDs or the chemical weapons?

Oh yeah..it was the nuclear material from Africa...oh wait..no..that wasnt true..that was a leak.

You know, intelligence at this day and age in America has taken on a new meaning in America. Its not about the facts, its about spin.

Its been long known that those agencies have created material and intelligence to promote their own programs and an agenda of their own.

May God expose them and their wicked schemes.

Peace

[edit on 7-11-2008 by HIFIGUY]

reply to post by ballast

---

Why is the OP post copied in it's entirety here?
www.thejerusalemgiftshop.com...

I just came across this linked at another site, and found it odd - it's even got the "----end quote----" bit, and the headline.

ballast - and mods - if the original post is original work, this is a legal issue that needs attention.

reply to post by HIFIGUY

---

It is about Obama's reaction after his intel briefing. he was/is now privy to far more data than as a Senator......From his expressions after his briefing. I would postulate he now realizes the enormity of the threat to the USA........Only the POTUS is cleared for all of the information (as so much is now compartmentalized)

(one)are the democrats going to generate it. or someone from out side the US

One thing i can think of would be a mass shooting and a gun ban.

What would the democrats do if a group (5 to 10) of terrorist types smuggled automatic weapons into the US and staged a mass shooting at a public event,
Would they try to ban all guns and require they be turned in.

terrorist would not have any trouble getting weapons from the drug cartels in mexico.

And we all know how easy it is to cross the border.
1000s of illegals do it every month.

The fact that a democrat predicts a "generated crisis" to me is a forwarning that it will be a democrat staged event.
fake terrorist? or brainwashed americans doing a attack?

Taking guns because of something like that would be a unpopular decision.
and banning guns because of a attack would be that.
and in the case of a terrorist type attack the American public would resist a gun ban.
"that would cause them to have to control the population as decisions are made and Americans resist."

I can not come up with another scenario that would fit that statement.

On October 23rd I posted the following



I received several requests in the thread and in u2u to divulge my source, I would not then, and I still will not now. However, for those who want to know more, CLICK HERE:



AND HERE



In actuality, they want to DEFACE the FACE of World Politics, and "injure" the current potus at the same time.

I'll repeat my warning: WHEN EVER BUSH IS IN NYC, YOU AND YOUR FAMILY SHOULD NOT BE !!!

view my post here.

perhaps this is something that should be undertaken - as in an ACTION being taken

As an American I for one am getting tired of feeling like a passenger in an out of control car (i.e. this country) thats being driven by a drunk man (i.e. any of our supposed leaders). Am I alone here?

[edit on 17-11-2008 by ch1ldofthe70s]

"“The problems will always be there and there’s going to be a crisis which will come along on the 21st, 22nd of January that we don’t even know about right now.” Powell told Meet the Press."

We know a specific future date of a crisis, that we don't know about.