It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

JAXA proves Moon Landing was NOT faked! Doesn't it?

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 22 2008 @ 12:00 PM
link   
Please excuse me for posting this if it already has (and feel free to delete), I did a search and couldn't find it relevant to a post about the landing not being faked.

I am sure it's on here already but for the life of me.. cannot find it as a thread.



The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) reported on the "halo" generated by the Apollo 15* lunar module engine exhaust plume that was detected in the data from Terrain Camera (TC) image.

This was an image processed by the SELENE mission instrument team from the observation data of the Apollo 15 landing site on the moon (the foot of the Apennine Mountains encircling the Mare Imbrium close to Hadley Rille). This is the world's first report on the detection of the "halo" through observations after the end of the Apollo program.



JAXA official Press Release

Visit link above for the full story...
Doesn't this, in effect, "prove" we landed on the moon?

Why isn't this HUGE on ATS?
What am I missing?

It is pretty clear to me that the proof is in (FIG 5)
Is Japan in on it too?

Note: I can accept that I am a complete dummy on this subject.

But it seems pretty clear cut now...




posted on Oct, 22 2008 @ 01:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by gormly
Is Japan in on it too?

This was previously discussed here, among other threads:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Not the first post, but on the first page you can find these images brought up in the discussion.

Glad you found this rather conclusive evidence for yourself though, it's always encouraging to see people discovering evidence of the truth.

[edit on 22-10-2008 by ngchunter]



posted on Oct, 22 2008 @ 01:22 PM
link   
Ok thanks for the link..
Now that I have read it, and yes, I am proud of myself for figuring it all out before seeing that I must say ...


I AM VERY PISSED THAT IT RECEIVES NO TRAFFIC ON ATS!!!

I guess if some ignorant conspiracy is proven to be untrue then they just pretend the evidence doesn't exist right?

Sad, sad commentary on my fellow ATS'ers.
At least have a fight on the merits of JAXA or something.

I mean TV shows and MOVIES have been made documenting the "Hoaxed Moon Landing" and now that there is proof.. not a damn peep from the peanut gallery.

Any Joe can post a "Moon landing Faked" thread and there's a thousand “experts” piling on.. post one thread with some proof..
post some real proof showing it wasn't fake and no one says "boo".


This is similar to what I call liberal rush (or media rush.. it's the same thing) when a claim is made and people chant it for days and days and use it as a talking point, then when the original claim is proven false, a retraction is printed on page 45 under the Viagra ad and everyone conveniently forgets about it.

I would like a list of names of those who have dedicated their lives to telling us all NASA is a fake organization full of PR and photoshop experts., then read them off in Time Square after each name saying “nanana .. na na na naaaa”



I know why it’s so quiet in here…

If NASA is telling the truth, (or more accurately if people were proven wrong about assuming NASA was lying) about the Moon landing, then all the rest of the BS conspiracies on ATS like moon bases, alien outposts and other silly theories would have to be looked at with even more scorn..

If NASA lies about the Moon landing, everything else is feasible.. if there is proof they aren’t.. everything else goes out the window.

Do I feel a breeze in here??



posted on Oct, 22 2008 @ 01:41 PM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Oct, 22 2008 @ 01:43 PM
link   
reply to post by gormly
 


Also, the Japan footage was fake too, it was way too obvious.

Don't know why they faked it, but I can recreate that junk on my 2004 comp.

-Lahara



posted on Oct, 22 2008 @ 01:45 PM
link   
Please add to existing discussion : Here

Thanks

Closed



new topics

top topics
 
0

log in

join