It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Ley-lines - ('Ley','lea' - 'A clearing')
('Heilige Linien' to the Germans 'Fairy paths' to the Irish, 'Dragon Lines' to the Chinese, 'Spirit Lines' to Peruvians and 'Dream paths' (Turingas) to the Australian Aborigines - and so on around the world).
Massau according to the Hopi researcher Frank Waters, is the same as the Jewish messiah. The two words are phonetically similar therefore interchangeable. Interestingly Massau or the messiah met the Hopi when their world came out of balance, or came out of Tula.
Originally posted by undo
Did you know, there's not a single remaining piece of art from ancient Sumer, that depicts a humanized "god"? All the humanized gods in mesopotamian art, are AFTER the black sea flood. Since the ones responsible were locked up/sent away, whatever, and Enki is put under special restraining orders, the artforms of the gods we see in Akkad and Babylon are based on memories that have been humanized. In other words, artforms depicting Enki as a human are LIES. They are fakeries. The only remaining full body images of beings from ancient Sumer are of Reptilians. Yes, REPTILIANS.
I know it sounds way out there, but folks, I've been scouring the archives for sumerian artifacts, specifically, and the only other things I can find are plates, bowls, vases, and odd little symbols, like charms or fetishes, of some kind. There are no depictions of human gods, no depictions of human kings, or human shaman or human anything, except the legless, decapitated females. Conversely, the Reptilians are mostly intact. I think there was only one with a missing head.
Yup, we caught 'em red-handed trying to cover up their own existence by influencing scholars to mesh the Sumerian and Akkadian timelines together when they are indeed separate for good reason. The flood not only marked the end of sumerian civilization, it marked the end of visible occupation by this particular line of ETs. The idea that they cannablized the humans is actually reported in the Book of Enoch, a book, btw, that was outlawed from being included in the biblical texts by the Holy Roman Catholic Church during the ecumenical councils.
It says, the planet was so polluted, food wouldn't grow. A massive drought kicked in, the plant life died, the animals were no longer edible, and the fallen ones (the ETs) and their hybrid offspring began to eat the human population because there was no food left. This would go a long way in explaining a great deal about the ancient past. Starting with why reptilians may not be all sunshine and lollipops. So much for enlightenment.
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by cosmicpixie
well first of all, i arrived at my conclusion by following the bouncing ball.
first, the humans were slaves. this much is evident from the writings of sitchin, as well. who was enslaving them? the special hybrid offspring were the kings (this is "when princeship/kingship descended from heaven) of sumer. the slaves were taught a trade skill but were not allowed to learn the language and write, only the priest-scribes could, and they were all offspring of the hybrids. so the slaves created an oral history (you find this all over the planet). and they maintained it till they were finally allowed to write it down. by then, the mainstream history of the past was cemented into place, and anything the human slaves could offer to challenge it, in any way, was considered unlikely. that is, till jesus came. then the crap hit the fan.
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by reconpilot
that doesn't address the topic at all. you're talking about christianity, i'm talking about human slaves in 3000 BC. you're talking about tolerance and then telling me to shut up. that's pretty tolerant. but you're in luck, cause it also says if folks dont want to hear what you have to say (and apparently, i can't even talk about 3000 BC now) then stop talking.
i take back all my research, the artifacts, the documents, the commentary, most of which you mischaracterized, then accused me of being prejudice against other races, which i'll have you know, i never said. in fact, i said, that some angels are reptilian, that's what the word seraph / (plural seraphim) means and that obviously, as a christian, i would have to agree that not all of them are bad! (you know why you don't know that? cause you didn't read my thread. you just assumed you knew. you stereotyped me! but i take it all back. forget what my research suggests. forget what sitchin said. forget dake and heiser and all the resources, i've used to come to my conclusions. let's just go with your version.
you have the podium. now what?
P.S. For those who are still interested in what i have to say, i have a 2 year old thread on the topic of stargates, entitled, "STARGATES ARE REAL" here (be warned it's over 150 pages long, actually has biblical references as well as sumerian, akkadian, egyptian etc, but reconpilot doesn't know that, so don't tell him. he's enjoying his little hatchet job he's trying to do on my research that he's never actually read):
[edit on 23-10-2008 by undo]