It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by silver6ix
Patently untrue, its illegal for a paper to make things up. The Sun like every other tabloid "sensationalise" the truth they do not invent stories.
When it comes to the truly outrageous stories in tabloids like the Weekly World News, there is little fear of legal retribution. Stories about UFOs or bizarre cults can neither be proven nor disproven. Even if someone could prove that a story was fake, there isn't really any law against making up fake news stories, as long as real people mentioned in the story haven't been libeled.
So glad you posted this pic Nohup or I'd have been spraying droplets on my window today trying to get something that looked similar. The ufo pic is clearly a water droplet and there's another, smaller one, just above and slightly to the left, also another to the right on the edge of those stormy looking clouds. That ufo pic was taken from behind a window. Good job 'cos there's big rain coming methinks. I remember the last GREATEST ufo pic printed in the UK tabloids. It was an out of focus seagull. Sad really, because UFO's are real and they can be photographed, we just gotta look up more and have our cameras ready.
Originally posted by Nohup
Originally posted by Unlimitedpossibilities
Originally posted by stewartw2
Its a drop of water on the lens
Okay. Now provide us with a similar example to support your claims, where it was indeed a water droplet.
Oh, my gosh! It's an invasion!
Originally posted by ausconspiracies_
reply to post by brettcal82
going from that small picture, it looks like the sun reflecting off the lens or a water droplet on the lens of the camera.
it's a shame about the resolution because we cannot see enough of it to tell if it is or not.
Originally posted by wigit
Sad really, because UFO's are real and they can be photographed, we just gotta look up more and have our cameras ready.
Originally posted by brettcal82it clearly states where the picture came from and the name of the women its her that should be questioned of her credibility not the damn paper that printed the story!