It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Secret and Forbidden
After passing through several tests, novices assembled at dawn in the 'temple.' A curtain rose and the spectators gazed at a man seated on a golden globe, completely nude, holding a snake in his hand.
Link
ZINZENDORF, COUNT VON, NICOLAUS LUDWIG
v Founder of the existing sect of Moravian Brethren; also of a religious society which he called the Order of the Grain of Mustard-Seed. He was ordained Bishop of the Moravians in 1737, and at request of King Frederiek William I of Prussia, went to London, and was received by Wesley. In 1741 he proceeded to Bethlehem, in America, and founded the Moravian Settlements. The prolific author of a hundred volumes. He was born at Dresden in 1700, and died in 1760.
Link
Count von Zinzendorf's mystical order takes on the style of Freemasonry; Zinzendorf claims the wound in Christ's side caused by the spear of Longinus became the veritable birth canal of the Christian Church; Rites of ritualistic sexual magic were said to be basis of his belief.
(Oh, what glances I send you now; I am one spirit with you and you are body with me and one soul. You treasure of the side, you mad little thing, I devour you like food and drink to fulfillment and am mad with love, out of my mind.)
Ach, welche Bickel ich dir irzt/ ich bin ein Geist mit dir/ und du ein Leib mit mire/ und ein Seel/ Du Seiten Kringel/ du tolles Dingel/ ich fress und sauf/ mich voll/ und bin vor Leibe toll/ und ausser mir
(Walton Hannah. Christian by Degrees, London, 1954. Pp 203-205.)
"Conductor (to Candidate): This is the place where our brethren stop to sprinkle the Devil's Pass with urine. You will contribute a few drops of urine to commemorate the time and place where all who pass here renounce the wiles and evils of the world to worship at the Shrine of Islam. Only a few drops will do.
"Candidate begins to obey instructions when the blinder is jerked from his eyes and he beholds before him a group disguised as women..."
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
Well, the claim is bandied about a lot on these boards, claims of tantric sex rites and the like.
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
But what about actual cases of eroticism within Freemasonry?
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
This is not to say that eroticism within Freemasonry doesn't exist and has not existed.
Irregular Freemasonry on the Continent had a couple of interesting cases.
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
The first is Cagliostro's "Egyptian Rite." Though I find this case to be of somewhat dubious origin.
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
Cagliostro delivered a speech in which it was declared that sensual pleasure was the highest aim of human life.
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
The second case is far more interesting and can be relied upon as being factual as there is actual evidence if you choose to seek it out.
.....
Count von Zinzendorf's mystical order takes on the style of Freemasonry; Zinzendorf claims the wound in Christ's side caused by the spear of Longinus became the veritable birth canal of the Christian Church; Rites of ritualistic sexual magic were said to be basis of his belief.
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
One other thing that I found a little strange is in Walton Hannah's "Christian by Degrees." It has to do with the Shriners.
Originally posted by LowLevelMason
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
The first is Cagliostro's "Egyptian Rite." Though I find this case to be of somewhat dubious origin.
Of course that's not even irregular freemasonry, thats someone who made up a rite and called it freemasonry. Remember, anyone can call something freemasonry, it doesn't make it so.
Guess my lodge just has a prettier goat than yours...
Originally posted by Roark
There is no "eroticism" within Freemasonry whatsoever, and any claim to the contrary is... just plain bizarre.
Originally posted by Roark
Truth be told... ours has really let itself go. Additionally, it smokes and cusses really badly.
Nobody wants to ride it anymore.
Originally posted by LowLevelMason
I believe this is simply evidence that most anti-masons have suppressed perverted sexual desires, and the only way they know to give them outlets is to project their fantasies onto their main target of attack - Freemasonry.
Erotic freemasonry is a oxymoron. The first word is the opposite of the second. I can't think of anything more un-erotic than a total sausage fest of guys dressed up in a ornate room repeating lines they've memorized. Even for the gay members, since most of the membership is older, can't find that erotic.
And that would be why its irregular freemasonry, and why none of the masons on here are to my knowledge irregular freemasons, and why we all caution anyone against joining anything but regular freemasonry.
It doesn't exist in regular freemasonry and never will, which frankly, is all that concerns me. What other people do who claim to be freemasnons doesn't concern me.
Of course that's not even irregular freemasonry, thats someone who made up a rite and called it freemasonry. Remember, anyone can call something freemasonry, it doesn't make it so.
This looks like a case where the original person existed but the claim was later made up. In any case, you notice this too is not freemasonry. This is someone trying to call something freemasonry - thus it only takes on its "style" - in order to give it some sort of illusion of credibility. Of course, we know real freemasonry makes no statements whatsoever about any religion, so this is also not an example of freemasonry.
This is a anti-mason book, and like all anti-mason books, most of it includes made up ritual designed to make freemasonry look more evil than it really is. I am not a Shriner, but much like the made up 32nd/33rd degree rituals you find on the web, this looks to be another case where someone made a ritual up when they couldn't find anything legitimate to gripe about the ritual.
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
...far-out sexual rites ...pious Christian...
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
Is an orgy or tantric sex perverted? I've always considered myself a bit of a meat and potatoes man, but I wouldn't consider these acts perverted.
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
Just because you don't find any aspects of your Lodge erotic, doesn't mean that you speak for all Masons.
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
We have had members on ATS who have been members of the Memphis-Mizraim Rite and they have considered themselves Freemasons, albeit of a more exotic nature.
Originally posted by Beelzebubbathose who "claim" to be Freemasons are in fact not so unless sanctioned by who? The UGLE?
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
It's easy to say that in hindsight, but look at the era when these two Orders came about. Innovatory Orders were those which added new material to the traditional Blue Lodge system. During this period many "innovatory" Orders were created, including the Scottish Rite. So those that made up a Rite and called it the Scottish Rite would also have been irregular, or as you put it, "not even irregular freemasonry?" What about the Shriners? Outside of the USA, they are regarded as a bit of a joke.
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
As A. E. Waite points out in his Encyclopedia of Freemasonry that there was not at this time a true "high grade" system on the Order of the Scottish Rite or the Templar-legend based Strict Observence.
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
It is a fact that Zinzendorfs Order was accepted into early German Freemasonry. It is also a fact that much of his theological beliefs played a large part in the mysteries of the Order. Real Freemasonry makes no statements whatsoever about any religion? What about the Christian degrees of the Holy Royal Arch?
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
Have you ever read any books by Hannah? Of all Masonic detractors, he is probably the least tempted to flights of fancy. So, not being a Shriner, you can't definitively say that the ritual doesn't or has not at some stage existed?
Originally posted by LowLevelMason
Your a meat and potatoes kind of guy and you do a lot of orgies, eh? No details needed, but..um..wow. I'd love to see what your wife/girl friend thinks of that.
Since when is it surprising that people who practice irregular/clandestine freemasonry think they are freemasons? That is the purpose of taking up such ventures after all. But I don't really care what they think, regular freemasonry doesn't accept them as such and irregular/clandestine freemasonry is NOT freemasonry, its people doing things with the label.
I have, and she is among the worst although not the worst. And no I can't say if it exists, but I believe a Shriner has already responded and said that it did not.
Originally posted by LowLevelMason
This looks like a case where the original person existed but the claim was later made up.
Link
London. In the l740s and 1750s, "Rabbi" Zinzendorf (as he was then called) directed a mission to the Jews in London, in which mutual Kabbalistic studies served as a bridge between religions. At the same time, he organized his followers into a hierarchical secret society that functioned as an offshoot of "irregular" or "illuminist" Freemasonry.
According to James Hutton, an English Moravian who became a lifelong friend of Richard Cosway, the public society held open meetings in the Fetter Lane Chapel, while the elite interior order (the "Pilgrim Church") met secretly, lived communally, and practised Kabbalistic rituals. If Blake's parents were aware of the interior "Pilgrim" order, it would explain Blake's own usage of Moravian-style sexual imagery.
Hutton described the Pilgrims as the unknown superiors of the larger society, for their identity was not revealed to lower-ranking initiates:
"...a congregation of labourers who go hither and thither; whom no one knows but he to whom it is revealed. Everyone who has a whole mind to our Saviour is a member of it. It is composed of persons who indissolubly cling together...and who labour for the good of others among all religions, but never form themselves into sect."
Henry Rimius described the Moravians as a nonsectarian, subversive secret society, whose leaders "are gradually sapping the foundation of civil government in any country they settle in, and establishing an empire within an empire." While the higher initiates practise "gnostic obscenities," the neophytes are left in ignorance of the ritualistic orgies.
Attendants at the public services in Fetter Lane were certainly aware of the theory, if not the practice, of Zinzendorf's Kabbalistic sexual agenda.
Since his student days, Swedenborg had access to rare instruction in heterodox Jewish mysticism, which included the more erotic and visionary theories of the Shabbeteans, secret disiciples of Sabbatai Zevi.
Swedenborg sought out Jewish Kabbalists in the East End, and soon met Dr. Samuel Jacob Falk, known as the "Baal Shem" of London. Falk was a crypto-Shabbetean, who collaborated with a network of fellow "Zoharites" in England, Holland, Poland, and Germany.
Following the Shabbeteans' example, some members of the network pretended conversion to Christianity and assimilated Kabbalistic notions of the Shekhinah into Christian notions of the Virgin Mary.
Société de l’Harmonie : Anton Mesmer.
-Albert. Encyclopedia of Freemasonry, Vol.II P.680
Moravian Brethren
Thye religious sect of Moravian brethren, which was founded in Upper Lusatia about 1722, by Count Zinzendorf, is said at one time to have formed a society of religious Freemasons. For an account of which see Mustard Seed, Order of.
- Mackey, Albert. Encyclopedia of Freemasonry, Vol.II P.688.
Mustard Seed, Order of.
The German title id Der Orden vom Senfkorn. This association whose members also called themselves "The Fraternity of Moravian Brothers of the Order of Religious Freemasons," was one of the first innovations introduced into German Freemasonry. It was initiated in the year 1730. It's mysteries were founded on the passage in the fourth chapter of St. Mark's Gospel in which Christ compares the Kingdom of Heaven to a mustard-seed. The Brethren wore a ring, on which was inscribed Keiner von uns lebt ihm selber, meaning in English, No one of us lives for himself. The jewel of the Order was a cross of gold surmounted by a mustard plant in full bloom, with the motto Quod fuit ante nihil, this Latin meaning What was before nothing. It was suspended from a green ribbon. The professed object of the Association was, through the instrumentality of Freemasonry, to extend the Kingdom of Christ over the world. It has long been obsolete. (See Zinzendorf, Count von Nicholas Ludwig)
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
Just because I don't find them perverted, does not necessarily mean I partake. Personal attacks are your style, eh?
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
I have no doubt that from within there are many divisions.
But as an outsider, you'll forgive me if I make a sweeping generalization here, I find that if it wears an apron and it ain't in the kitchen, it's a Freemason.
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
Walton Hannah was a man, so I think you indirectly answered that question for me.
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
His scholarship was taken seriously enough by the Anglican Church to spark a discussion within C of E Assembly in 1952, as well as play a major role in the 1985 Anglican Synod.
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
Nothing from any Shriners yet. Just comments about the attractiveness (or lack thereof) of goats.
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
For your perusal:
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
In doing a little digging, I could find very little, and the truth of the matter is that as much as many of us would like to believe (maybe even a couple of Masons as well... ) in the sexual proclivities of Freemasons within the Lodge, it may be the case that it is just as they say: A bunch of men of varying ages sitting around doing asexual rituals in an asexual atmosphere.
This is not to say that eroticism within Freemasonry doesn't exist and has not existed.
Irregular Freemasonry on the Continent had a couple of interesting cases.
Ximenes
[Wesley, John.] Queries humbly proposed to the Right Reverend and Right Honourable Count Zinzendorf. London: sold by J. Robinson, and T. James, 1755. 32 pp
One of the hardest things for non-Masons to understand about Freemasonry is that it is not a single, monolithic organization with one head and a single 'identity'. Freemasonry has grown in various ways in various parts of the world and although the signs and modes of recognition in 'regular' Masonic bodies are recognizable to other Masons, they are rarely identical in every respect. Further, each Grand Lodge decides for itself and its members what other bodies are 'regular'. Thus, the Grand Lodge of A might recognize Grand Lodges B and C while the Grand Lodge of B might not recognize Grand Lodge C as being a Masonic body. Confusing? You bet - although the instances of this type of thing are VERY small and usually involve very small Grand Lodges in very small countries! It's a complicated set of mutual recognitions that decide who is 'recognized and regular' and who is not.
Masonicinfo
As just one example of confusion, the Order of the Eastern Star is recognized and accepted as a part of the 'Masonic family' by every Grand Lodge in the United States. They're very much a part of various events throughout the jurisdiction and although not allowed into closed lodge meetings of Masons, they use that very same Masonic hall for THEIR meetings! Curiously, however, the United Grand Lodge of England - the oldest Grand Lodge in the world and from whom most recognized Grand Lodges in the world derive their heritage - considers the OES to be 'clandestine' and forbids the Members of the UGLE to attend meetings of the group. Is the Order of the Eastern Star 'clandestine'? Guess it depends....
Originally posted by Rockpuck
If you are not considered a Freemason by fellow Freemasons, you simply ARE NOT A FREEMASON.
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
Ya know, occasionally a member will join ATS and start blustering away about how much they know and how everyone else is an idiot, except for those that agree with them.
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
In my opening post I made mention of how within regular Freemasonry there was no proof of eroticism inside the Lodge. I mentioned that there were a couple of cases in irregular Freemasonry and cited those cases.
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
A certain member then has to come to the defence of Freemasonry. This member tells me that these two Orders aren't even "irregular." He then claims that the information on Zinzendorf is fabricated. When shown evidence of Zinzendorf's Order, supplied by an esteemed Masonic scholar. Well... that scholarship is obviously faulty. What a towering intellect we must have among us that they can discount entries in an Encyclopedia of Freemasonry!, without supplying any links or evidence of other Masonic scholars who have deemed Zinzendorf's Order "irregular."
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
Then I'm given a lecture on what is "regular," "irregular," "clandestine," "quasi,"... etc... Even though I stated in my first post that there were differences. I know there are differences, but who is to say who really is a "Freeason" and who is not?
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
Then, of course, the member (whom I suspect was frothing at the mouth by this stage) has to "debunk" the link to the information concerning Zinzendorf that is on a "Conspiracy website" (
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
This member also has the audacity to make allusions about my sex-life saying that because I stated that I don't find "orgies" perverted, then I must be involved in them and what does my wife think of that. Well, it's none of his damned business! Of course it's a "justified" personal attack, because I don't find that kind of stuff perverted. If it really did offend me, do you think I would've responded with a one-liner. The fact that this member had to take it to a personal level by casting aspersions about me, shows the level of his maturity.
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
Oh, and the "typo" thing was hilarious.