It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by time91
reply to post by GreenBicMan
Because if gold really takes off it could mean the end of the overvalued fiat currencies everywhere. The U.S. Dollar would go down with the rest. The Euro may remain higher (as well as the pound) but what they're trying to prevent is a possible paper currency collapse, where all unbacked money loses significant value.
Government watchdogs on Wednesday raised a red flag over the Obama administration's program for helping homeowners avoid foreclosure, saying the multibillion-dollar fund is not working and the Treasury Department refuses to fix it.
Warning that the inefficiencies could hold the economy back, the officials told a Senate panel that changes should be made and that Treasury needs to come clean. One official called the program "one of the greatest failures in transparency and accountability" in the $700 billion bailout.
A $50 billion fund was carved out of the Wall Street bailout for the mortgage program. The housing market being a root cause of the 2008 economic crisis, the money was pitched as a way to help millions of homeowners avoid foreclosure and get the economy back on track.
But a fraction of that money, $248 million, has been spent.
Elizabeth Warren, chairwoman of the congressional TARP Oversight Panel, said that for every one family that wins a permanent mortgage modification, "10 more have been moved out through foreclosure."
"This is a program that's just -- it's behind the curve," she told the panel on Wednesday.
Originally posted by GreenBicMan
1. Explain why gold taking off would do this. Remember, gold isn't close to the adjusted for inflation high of 198x which I believe was over $2251/oz. Inflation adjusted data Using this logic would mean we would have been doomed years ago. The 90's weren't a real bad decade though to be long any US [any security you could buy] if I remember correctly.
2. The US Dollar would go down with the rest... Why? Show me the correlation between historical gold prices and the GDP of the USA. Then create a chart of historical gold prices vs US DOLLAR INDEX.
3.The Euro remains higher and pound? Why? Show me the historical gold price vs United Kingdom GDP and then show me the correlation between the estimated yearly GDP of the European Union. Then show me the correlation between those 2 currencies and historical gold prices.
And again, they obviously are not 100% correlated.
4. Again, paper currency collapse? What are you basing that off of? There is over 1.2 TRILLION DOLLARS CHANGING HANDS EVERY DAY IN GLOBAL FX MARKETS. The estimate in the next 10 years almost double.
Anyway, if you are going to believe things like this that you read (because I am guessing you didn't come up with this yourself) be preapred to do some real research before you repeat stupid things. This would be considered one of the stupid things. You should have realized this as the US DOLLAR LOST GROUND, ALMOST 10 cents to EURO over the past 2 weeks and GOLD WAS LIQUIDATED TO COVER EUR REBOUND. So this would mean the US was long US DOLLARS and then SOLD THEIR GOLD TO BUY EURO'S? That isn't the most damning part of this delusion though. You still have to explain how this would unfold mechanically.
Since you won't find anything significant at all to what you are talking about, just do this. Tell me what the mechanism will be for the Federal Reserve to go about this scheme. They are selling what to buy gold, or they are buying what to short gold? Or are they just using deposits from banks to move money into the gold market?
Do you really think you or "some guy" that wrote the blog that you are referencing really understands the correlation between all these assets and how it is affected by other foreign currency movements and interest rate policy?
A House panel is set to take up a piece of legislation this week that would give American consumers the ability to sue foreign manufacturers for injuries resulting from dangerous or defective products in U.S. courts, according to The Dow Jones Newswire.
The Foreign Manufacturer Legal Accountability Act, introduced by Rep. Betty Sutton and co-sponsored by over 60 representatives of both parties, is a response to a rash of defective and dangerous foreign products that have flooded the American market in recent years.
"If foreign entities have the benefit of selling products and making profits from sales in the U.S., they should be accountable if the product causes harm," Ami Gadhia, policy counsel for the Consumers Union, said in a House hearing last month, according to the Dow Jones Newswire.
Originally posted by GreenBicMan
reply to post by wxguru
No, educated people wouldn't buy into this theory. Also, I am kind of doubting schooling has anything to do with it. Common sense would help as well.
Originally posted by GreenBicMan
OK
You are hopefully just the teller because this is not possible. You are more than welcome to have any opinion you want though. It is the wrong one.
Btw, you were born in 1991? This makes more sense. Go back to school kid, don't make my mistakes in life.