It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
U.S. job losses seen jumping to 648,000 in February
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Job losses in the United States likely accelerated last month and the unemployment rate probably surged to a 25-year high as recession-hit companies took drastic steps to cut costs, according to economists.
They reckon that the U.S. economy, reeling from the worst financial crisis since the 1930s and stuck in recession since December 2007, will continue to bleed jobs well into the second half of next year, even as overall output begins to recover.
The Labor Department is scheduled to release its February non-farm payrolls report on Friday at 8:30 a.m.
A poll of 78 economists by Reuters produced a median forecast that employers outside the farm sector slashed 648,000 jobs in February after cutting 598,000 positions in January. Forecasts for February ranged from a loss of 800,000 jobs to a drop of 500,000.
Manufacturing payrolls were estimated to have shrunk by 195,000.
The survey predicted the unemployment rate would rise to 7.9 percent, which would be the highest level since January 1984. The U.S. jobless rate was 7.6 percent in January.
Barry wants the market to fail. He has challenged Wall Street. Look it up on youtube. He and Gordon have plans for you. Market failure is an action to create their ultimate solution. They're very evil people. Don't take my word for it. Sit back and watch it unfold. You won't like the NEW solution. Its all been in the cards for years. They have a deadline to meet. They're a few months behind at moment. Plans are not going smoothly. Can someone pass me the salt for my popcorn? BTW, Wake the F up!!!
Good night friend!! Sleepy, p***** about the things coming our way. Just trying to tell what I wish to help others, we all will bond after the ppppppppppppfffffffffttttt goes off.
That means everyone will understand the entire system. Our Gods/religious hokeyness of money & domination will be laughed upon.
I must say this to Bill Gates, and we don't see eye to eye. However, without these tools you helped create, we wouldn't have excelled as a civilization. Thank you. This took alot for me to state, so we'll leave this on a positive note. Just don't forget to use the 'KEY' when the SHTF. We really need the interface to stay open. We are counting on you. :>)
...
[...] By law, the Fed isn't allowed to buy assets -- it can only lend, as lender of last resort. That was a problem for the Bear Stearns bailout, because JP Morgan said it would only buy Bear if someone else assumed responsibility for the crap. [The] Fed came up with this idea to start a shadow company, called a special purpose vehicle (SPVs were how Enron operated, creating "Chewco" and the like named after Chewbacca - the New York Fed called their SPV "Maiden Lane LLC" for name of the street the NY Fed is located on in southern Manhattan). The deal then was JP Morgan put $1 billion into Maiden Lane, the Fed put $29 billion in cash into it. Maiden Lane paid Bear Stearns $30 billion, which went straight back to JP Morgan as this deal happened simultaneously to JP's purchase of Bear. So Morgan got $30 billion in cash ($29 billion net) and the Fed got stuck owning the crap, but was legally only making a loan to Maiden Lane, who was the legal owner (Maiden Lane was incorporated not in NYC, but in Delaware to avoid paying taxes). By the Fed's own accounting - which is very different from a real company's accounting - Maiden Lane has lost $5 billion between its creation and today....
Using the loophole it had learned during Bear Stearns, the Fed set up two new companies: Maiden Lane II and Maiden Lane III [to help bail out AIG's investors]. Two dealt with the secured lending and Three the #ty credit default swaps. The Fed lent each Maiden Lane $20 billion and $25 billion and then Maiden Lane paid off the investors that had either lent AIG the money to buy the #ty mortgage backed securities (ML II) and those who had the #ty mortgages and the corresponding insurance (ML III). To avoid booking a loss on the Fed's balance sheet, because the Fed had some legal problems if either of these Maiden Lanes lost money, and because of a reporting requirement that Dodd had put into TARP which actually required the Fed to report to the Congress and the public about the cost to taxpayers from ML I, the Fed did some creative accounting. They still paid all of the investors off at full value (par), so that they didn't lose anything. But they booked the loss on AIG's balance sheet and kept Maiden Lane clean...
...This is the hidden story behind how AIG went from losing $38 billion during the first 9 months of 2008 to losing $61 billion in the 4th quarter.
This was all exposed at today's hearing. And despite repeated requests from Senators on both sides - Dodd, Shelby, Corker, Warner - the Fed is still refusing to say who it bailed out through Maiden Lane II and III.
In other words, through a little game.
Originally posted by supertrot
Due to personal experience, I can see why Citi is in trouble. I know that my situation is not an isolated case from talking to others in the area. A few years ago I signed a mortgage with Citi to consolidate higher interest personal property loans. At the time I owned my house outright, so I qualified for a no closing cost loan. Their problem is that they own the housing appraisors (which is illegal--appraisors are required to be an unbiased third party). After the appraisor spoke to the loan officer, he valued my home at four times the fair market value. I live in a small economically depressed area with population 2500. For comparison purposes the appraisor used properties forty miles away in a city of 250,000. This did not really bother me I was able to consolidate more loans, shave several points of of interest rates, and lower my monthly payments by 2/3. Unfortunatly, I had to file chapter 7 last fall after losing my job. Now Citi has repossesed a house which, after the real estate market fell, which is roughly worth 1/9th of the money owed aginst it.
Yeah, I know. I have added to the current problem; but, that bank should not have resorted to illegal means just to write more loans. I never envisioned that I would have to default with the salary I was making. I lost my contracting job of 15 years due to lack of construction. I simply could not afford the payments on my new limited income.
Originally posted by supertrot
Due to personal experience, I can see why Citi is in trouble. I know that my situation is not an isolated case from talking to others in the area. A few years ago I signed a mortgage with Citi to consolidate higher interest personal property loans. At the time I owned my house outright, so I qualified for a no closing cost loan. Their problem is that they own the housing appraisors (which is illegal--appraisors are required to be an unbiased third party). After the appraisor spoke to the loan officer, he valued my home at four times the fair market value. I live in a small economically depressed area with population 2500. For comparison purposes the appraisor used properties forty miles away in a city of 250,000. This did not really bother me I was able to consolidate more loans, shave several points of of interest rates, and lower my monthly payments by 2/3. Unfortunatly, I had to file chapter 7 last fall after losing my job. Now Citi has repossesed a house which, after the real estate market fell, which is roughly worth 1/9th of the money owed aginst it.
Yeah, I know. I have added to the current problem; but, that bank should not have resorted to illegal means just to write more loans. I never envisioned that I would have to default with the salary I was making. I lost my contracting job of 15 years due to lack of construction. I simply could not afford the payments on my new limited income.
They gave me the credit card, with a $2,500 limit. That's just stupid, and they deserve to go under.
Originally posted by Tentickles
Great Im watching CNN and they are talking about the 12 year low. All they can talk about is how Washington isnt doing anything to stop the stock market fall.
C'mon idiots! Dont leave everything upto the government. That just gives them more power over stuff they dont need to be in!
Originally posted by BostonBill99
Am I missing something???
The jobs report comes out, and the job market gets worse.....
Yet the Dow and S&P futures go up????
I don't get it.
Originally posted by uplander
Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd is moving to allow the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. to temporarily borrow as much as $500 billion from the Treasury Department.