It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Advanta Corp., the issuer of credit cards for small businesses, will shut down accounts for its 1 million customers next month and seek to pay off securitized debtholders early as the recession pushes defaults higher.
Lending will cease June 10 as part of a plan to preserve capital after uncollectible debt reached 20 percent on some cards as of March 31, the Spring House, Pennsylvania-based firm said yesterday in a statement. Advanta will use as much as $1.4 billion to pay investors as little as 65 cents on the dollar to buy back securitized credit-card loans. That would be the first so-called early amortization of a trust since 2003, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co. analyst Christopher Flanagan.
“Early-amortization has been viewed as a catastrophic event for issuers,” Scott Valentin, an analyst at Friedman Billings Ramsey & Co., said today in a research note. “Given that all credit-card accounts in the trust will be shut down to future use, we expect losses to increase as the cards have substantially less utility to cardholders.”
Advanta Corp., the credit-card issuer for small businesses, may leave 1 million customers scrounging to find new lenders and debt holders facing losses of 35 percent after the company shut down accounts to preserve capital.
Advanta will cease lending June 10 after uncollectible debt reached 20 percent as of March 31, according to a statement and filings yesterday by the Spring House, Pennsylvania-based firm. The lender earmarked $1.4 billion to buy back securitized card loans with offers of 65 cents to 75 cents on the dollar.
[snip]
“The question is how many business owners depend solely on their Advanta credit card,” said William Dunkelberg, chief economist at the National Federation of Independent Business. While most probably have other sources of credit, self-employed entrepreneurs may have trouble getting a new card, he said. “Credit is harder to find than it’s ever been in this expansion,” said Dunkelberg, whose biography lists him as a former Advanta director.
Originally posted by redhatty
Originally posted by stander
I'm not manipulating anything by focusing on month-to-month change. That's what the page 2 you recommended to me to peruse as evidence that the 50% figure does exist really says.
Sales taxes were $452
million lower (-50.9%) than last April,
It says "last April" not "April 2008." It's not based on "year-to-year" comparison as you first line claims.
Oh my stander, I forgot, there aren't enough pretty pictures in that pdf to keep you interested. You see, if you had scrolled back up to the beginning of that "bullet" entry on page 1 you would see:
Compared to April 2008, General Fund revenue in April
2009 was down $6.3 billion (-39%). The total for the three
largest taxes was below 2008 levels by $6.3 billion
(Continued on page 2)
(Continued from page 1)
(-40.3%). Sales taxes were $452
million lower (-50.9%) than last April,
and personal income taxes were
down $5.7 billion (-43.6%). Corporate
taxes were $142 million below (-8.6%)
April of 2008.
So you see it does CLEARLY display YoY figures.
Originally posted by stander
Yes, Corporate taxes were compared to April 2008, but the Sales tax figures for May 2009 are compared to April 2009. I never mentioned the Corporate taxes issue you are switching to for some reason. The article you provided link to doesn't mention Corporate taxes as well -- it ringed alarm due to 50% decrease in Sales taxes. So I don't know what are you trying to pull here. Whatever it is doesn't work with me.
One of the most insane ideas we've heard of may soon become reality.
Fox Biz is reporting that the House Financial Services Committee is set to take up legislation this week that would establish a federal backstop for all Municipal bonds and muni insurance.
This would, of course, represent another massive expansion of the government's guarantees and turn all states into Fannie and Freddy.
It's official: The government in Beijing has announced that the Yuan can now be used in international trade. Their mouthpiece for this occasion was the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, a private entity, which made the announcement on their behalf. By the end of this year, it is expected that fully 50% of all transactions with Hong Kong will be denominated in the Yuan. In turn, Hong Kong re-exports 90% of its Chinese imports. Importer #1 is the European Union; importer #2 is the United States. Some of these countries may soon find themselves hard-pressed to earn enough Yuan to continue importing Chinese-made products.
This is only the next small step in Beijing's "policy of small steps." Already the Chinese government has ramped down its purchases of US Treasury paper, forcing the Federal Reserve to step in as the buyer of last resort. The IOU, with which the US has inundated the world, is now becoming the I-owe-me - which is not quite as impressive to those who are considering selling products to the US on credit. Instead of the funny paper, the Chinese government has started to buy up gold on the international market. The Yuan has long been in de facto use in Hong Kong, Sigapore, Kuala Lumpur, and other countries in the region, in preference to the US Dollar. In several countries it is already possible to have Yuan-denominated savings and checking accounts; in Hong Kong alone such accounts are set to exceed US$100 billion by the end of this year.
About 50 percent of Hong Kong’s trade with China may be settled in yuan as exporters reduce their exposure to a weakening dollar, Industrial & Commercial Bank of China (Asia) Ltd. said.
The first settlements of international trade using China’s currency will start with about 400 Chinese companies in five pilot cities, Stanley Wong, deputy general manager at the unit of China’s biggest bank, said in an interview today in Hong Kong. The payments may expand to half of the $30 billion in trade excluding transshipments when authorities extend the program nationwide as soon as 2010, he said.
“There has been a perception that the U.S. dollar will continue to weaken,” said Wong. “Definitely on an annual basis, the yuan will probably appreciate against the U.S. dollar around 3 percent to 5 percent. It makes sense for companies to avoid foreign-exchange risk.”
Japan's opposition party says it would refuse to buy American government bonds denominated in US dollars, if elected.
The chief finance spokesman of the Democratic Party of Japan, Masaharu Nakagawa, told the BBC he was worried about the future value of the dollar.
Japan has been a major buyer of US government bonds, helping the US finance its Federal budget deficits.
But, he added, it would continue to buy bonds only if they were denominated in yen - the so-called samurai bonds.
LAYOFF DAILY
Tue 5-12-2009
West Contra Costa, CA Schools -124
Park Nicollet Health Services -240
ArcelorMittal Steel indefinite layoffs -242
Cochella Valley, CA School District -114
ArcelorMittal plant in Warren, OH permanent closure -69
Case New-Holland Forklifts -150
Atlanta, GA school board -200
Geisinger Wyoming Valley Hospital -180
Omnisource Corp. -135
Eircom (Ireland) -1,200
Eastern Washington University -110
Maloof Sports & Entertainment -12
Continental AG -87 2,000
City of Maricopa, CA -10
Icon Metal Forming LLC -140
Barclays (UK) slashes IT staff -700
Chicago Parks District warns of potential layoffs -400
Additional City of Toledo layoffs -71
Microsoft hints at more layoffs if the economy doesn't improve
30% of small businesses plan layoffs, 45% see sales decreaase
American Axle temporary layoffs -399
Goss International -170
GM likely to cut 40% of all dealerships
Modesto, CA School board proposes job cuts -70
TeleTech (Canada) -279
Plasco Energy (Canada) -57
APAC Customer Services -92
DM Industries -206
Cochella Valley, CA School District -114
Burbank, CA School District -34
Delphi -200
Kentwood, MI Schools -153
City of Gilroy, CA -33
Kent, WA area schools -35
Wausau, WI school board -16
TOTAL - 7,955 ish
Originally posted by redhatty
Originally posted by stander
Yes, Corporate taxes were compared to April 2008, but the Sales tax figures for May 2009 are compared to April 2009. I never mentioned the Corporate taxes issue you are switching to for some reason. The article you provided link to doesn't mention Corporate taxes as well -- it ringed alarm due to 50% decrease in Sales taxes. So I don't know what are you trying to pull here. Whatever it is doesn't work with me.
Stander, it is 12 days into May 2009, HOW could they POSSIBLY be comparing May 2009 sales tax number to April 2009? The month isn't even done yet.
They are talking about April 2009 sales tax numbers being down just over 50% from April 2008 numbers.
But if you cannot read and comprehend that fact, there is nothing I can do to help you with that.
Source has been cited, you can disregard it if you wish, but it doesn't change the reality of things. Cali is Scroomed
Compared to April 2008, General Fund revenue in April
2009 was down $6.3 billion (-39%). The total for the three
largest taxes was below 2008 levels by $6.3 billion
Another source familiar with the FDIC's plans said on Tuesday that the agency was considering seeking to create a new fund to help deal with any resolution of systemically important financial institutions.
AIG Trustees Should Answer to Taxpayers, Not Fed, Towns Says
www.bloomberg.com...
May 12 (Bloomberg) -- A House panel plans to ask trustees assigned to safeguard the U.S. government’s $182.5 billion investment in American International Group Inc. whether their supervision by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York serves taxpayers’ interests.
The trustees -- Jill Considine, Chester Feldberg and Douglas Foshee -- were appointed in January by the New York Fed, a private institution owned by member banks, which has the power to overturn some of their decisions and to remove them. Edolphus Towns, a New York Democrat who chairs the House Committee on Oversight and Reform that will hold hearings tomorrow, said he’s concerned that the interests of AIG’s customers and trading partners may outweigh those of taxpayers.
“As a $182.5 billion recipient of taxpayer dollars, AIG should no longer be able to operate in the dark,” said Towns in an e-mail. “The American people, who now own a major portion of this company, deserve clarification on core issues of the AIG bailout -- who exactly is in charge at AIG and who is protecting the taxpayer’s multibillion-dollar investment?”