It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Tax Foundation estimates that under the Obama plan 63 million Americans, or 44% of all tax filers, would have no income tax liability and most of those would get a check from the IRS each year. The Heritage Foundation's Center for Data Analysis estimates that by 2011, under the Obama plan, an additional 10 million filers would pay zero taxes while cashing checks from the IRS.
Originally posted by pieman
reply to post by TheRooster
i disagree, cutting employees is never an option in a small well run business. the reason big companies sometimes do so is because it cuts overheads to remove an entire shift or because the work can be easily done by an alternative, for instance, it is cheaper to lay off 1 worker in 10 and allow the remaining 9 workers one hour of overtime.
this type of strategy doesn't work if you only have three or four employees.
Originally posted by pieman
reply to post by TheRooster
so you think that the rich shouldn't be taxed because they have worked for a few years to get their businesses off the ground?
Originally posted by pieman
do the majority of people in america earning $250,000 a year plus, in your opinion, own their own business?
at what point is a small business in america likely to turn enough of a profit to allow the owner of that business to award themselves a net salary of $250,000 per year?
Originally posted by pieman
reply to post by TheRooster
the other thing is a point, i hear all the time that america gives a man the opportunity to make himself better and earn money based on his potential rather than his class, or something like that. i would assume america has given these people the opportunity to be good enough to have such a healthy income, doesn't he owe america some small portion of his comfortable income?
Originally posted by pieman
reply to post by RKWWWW
you've clearly never been involved with a small business, i can assure you 250k is quite a lot of money.
well, how much is enough is none of my business but i'm interested to know if the principle is acceptable.
[edit on 17/10/08 by pieman]
Originally posted by RKWWWW
Is it none of your business because you aren't a US citizen?
Originally posted by pieman
Originally posted by RKWWWW
Is it none of your business because you aren't a US citizen?
thats correct, i've said that more than once, i'm just interested.
Originally posted by pieman
reply to post by TheRooster
that did answer my question but i have more, i hope you don't mind, the thing about the job descriptions you mentioned are pretty much freelance type jobs, when i think of a small business i'm thinking a store owner or a cab driver or, well, a plumber or carpenter or the like. do they earn that much?
the other thing is a point, i hear all the time that america gives a man the opportunity to make himself better and earn money based on his potential rather than his class, or something like that. i would assume america has given these people the opportunity to be good enough to have such a healthy income, doesn't he owe america some small portion of his comfortable income?
accepted, you've got to be kidding, not on ATS.
Originally posted by RKWWWW
Ok. So, yeah the principle of paying taxes is accepted fact of life in the US.
Originally posted by TheRooster
Originally posted by buddhasystem
reply to post by TheRooster
I'm asking for your help to clarify why Obama's plan is worse than McCain's. See the link above where a business owner calculates that his liability will be less with Obama's plan.
buddha, I've got a problem with anyone who takes my hard earned money and wants to give it away, I don't care what you call it, it's just wrong! We are heading for the USSA, United Socialist States of America if any man implements a plan that attacks the "have's" at a rate unequal to the "have nots".
As I don't really have the time to committ to reading the fine print of his program, my post was directed at the issue of BHO's response to JTP of re-disrtibuting the wealth.
Originally posted by pieman
accepted, you've got to be kidding, not on ATS.
Originally posted by RKWWWW
Ok. So, yeah the principle of paying taxes is accepted fact of life in the US.
yeah, i know taxes are accepted but what i mean to say is that it seems to me to be the case that the posters in this thread don't accept the principle that the wealthiest 5% of the population should be paying a higher tax rate than everybody else.
50% is quite steep but i wonder if the figures are being massaged by the opposition.
Obama's 95% Illusion It depends on what the meaning of 'tax cut' is.
Obama's Tax Plan Is Really a Welfare Plan
Originally posted by pieman
reply to post by TheRooster
but if it's personal income tax 50% seems pretty sound.