Attacking the average Joe?, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times


reply posted on 17-10-2008 @ 11:31 AM by Stormdancer777
reply to post by tide88




I understand your point, Tide, but the issue is, Joe, attacking Joe is the issue,

and I don't think it is fair,Now people are coming up with all these conspiracy theories about Joe,

Good grief he will have to leave the country.

huffington post disclosed his address, it is dangerous



reply posted on 17-10-2008 @ 11:37 AM by tide88
reply to post by nyk537



Also with Obamas tax plan those 45k/year plumbers may not have jobs. What do you think they would rather have, a secure job or a small tax break?


reply posted on 17-10-2008 @ 11:41 AM by pieman
Originally posted by tide88
reply to
post by nyk537



Also with Obamas tax plan those 45k/year plumbers may not have jobs. What do you think they would rather have, a secure job or a small tax break?


how? surely if you earn 250k you won't drop an employee because you don't get a tax break. this sounds like a whole lot of scare mongering.


reply posted on 17-10-2008 @ 11:51 AM by pieman
reply to post by nyk537



realistically, no company will drop an employee unless it costs them more to employ that person than the person makes for the company. if that was to be the case then the tax would have to be per employee!!

hence scaremongering.



reply posted on 17-10-2008 @ 11:55 AM by TheRooster
Originally posted by pieman
post by nyk537



how? surely if you earn 250k you won't drop an employee because you don't get a tax break. this sounds like a whole lot of scare mongering.


Beautiful, just beautiful! An average person asks the "messiah" a simple question. Before the "messiah" can insert a foot, his socialist agenda flops out exposing our future under this mans rule and now it's "scare mongering"? WTF? I believe we are witnessing blind devotion followed by devout ignorance! How can anyone vote for this man?

And for those of you who didn't bother to check out Michelle Malkin's blog, here's just an excerpt:

As I note below, there’s also a feeding frenzy over Wurzelbacher’s tax lien. Patterico wonders where the media hounds are on the story of Obama’s treasurer’s tax liens. Bet you hadn’t heard about that. Bet you never will again


Obama’s treasurer’s tax liens.

[edit on 10/17/2008 by TheRooster]


reply posted on 17-10-2008 @ 11:58 AM by Stormdancer777
reply to post by TheRooster






Obama’s treasurer’s tax liens. Bet you hadn’t heard about that. Bet you never will again


Yea I read that, I was going to bring it up.

I say write Joe in for POTUS.



reply posted on 17-10-2008 @ 12:01 PM by pieman
reply to post by TheRooster



did you just read my last post or something, you're just shouting at me without answering the original question, why is it socialist to give a tax break to a poor man but not socialist to give a tax break to a rich man?

i bet obama supporters really like posts like yours.

[edit on 17/10/08 by pieman]


reply posted on 17-10-2008 @ 12:03 PM by nyk537
reply to post by pieman



The issue here is that it's socialist to "spread the wealth around".

The taxes themselves aren't even the issue as much as what he wants to do with them.


reply posted on 17-10-2008 @ 12:06 PM by tide88
Originally posted by pieman
reply to
post by nyk537



realistically, no company will drop an employee unless it costs them more to employ that person than the person makes for the company. if that was to be the case then the tax would have to be per employee!!

hence scaremongering.

You know what it cost already to hire a person. Especially a person in construction? You have workers comp. Which already amounts to anywhere from 10-40%/ per hundred of payroll, depending on industry. Then you have unemployment insurance, social securtiy, etc. The profit margin per employee is already thin. So now you want to make it thinner by raising taxes. People will cut jobs. Even worse people will not hire as many people. You do not raise taxes, under any circumstances, on the only businesses that account for 100% of new hires right now.


reply posted on 17-10-2008 @ 12:11 PM by pieman
reply to post by nyk537



thats what percentage taxes do, that's their function!!

regardless, doesn't matter.
so are you saying it is a bad thing that obama wishes to make average americans richer instead of maintaining the present two tier system?

do you think that in america, at the moment, hard work = well paid?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Poland Beekeepers Win Ban on Monsanto\'s GMO!
  Posted 12 days ago with 74 member flags
Girl, 16, Kills Herself After Researching 2012 Doomsday Threads...
  Posted 9 days ago with 49 member flags
AP IMPACT: Evacs and drills pared near nuke plants
  Posted 11 days ago with 31 member flags
Plane Crash!
  Posted 18 days ago with 27 member flags