Originally posted by Jay-in-AR
reply to post by SUNRAY06
This is a complete side-note here, but this is worthy of this sort of topic...
At one of the places I work, they have decided to mandate people first aid training (having been a combat certified life-saver in the Army, I thought
the training futile, I'm up on first-aid). Anyhow, apparently now they are teaching CPR with NO resusitation... No breaths at all!
RIDICULOUS!!!
Apparently the risk of... Well, I don't even know WHY they would remove this from the training... Over inflation of the lungs?
Contracting hepatitis?... Anyhow, people are crazy.
Based on extensive research the American Heart Association has found that mouth-to-mouth has NO effect on increasing the oxygen level in the blood,
because you have to stop compressions to do it.
When compressions stop the blood is no longer moving and can't pick up oxygen from the lungs.
Based on several years of studies on bystander CPR where bystanders were reluctant to perform mouth-to-mouth, the AHA found that people who had
compressions only had a HIGHER survival rate.
So now the recommendation is that when someone is not breathing you should begin compressions FAST and HARD at 100 per minute. That is an incredibly
fast pace, but they found that oxygen content in the blood was still high enough after several minutes of CPR that it could still perfuse the brain,
as long as the blood is moving.
Of course 911 and AED should be done as soon as possible, because CPR alone will almost never work without defibrillation. CPR is only a temporary
measure to keep the brain working until definitive care arrives.
This situation is tragic and awful. In my state responders cannot be sued for performing CPR or using an AED, even if not trained. Ironically they
can't be sued even if they ARE trained and don't use it. This was done to encourage businesses and public agencies to install public access AEDs
and encourage their use.