Originally posted by Static Sky
reply to post by Amaterasu
Good link. Thank you for that. But it is known that a flu vaccine contains the 3 most likely (according to scientists predictions), strains to spread across a region in any given year. It's also known that once the human body defeats a particular strain of flu virus, it is immune to that strain, at least for a time.
I suggest to you that that is the hype they tell you. It would seem that all truly independent research says that there is no evidence of this being so. Meanwhile, you are having a plethora of stuff that should NEVER be in your bloodstream injected:
Formaldehyde - though the body produces a form of formaldehyde, it is NOT the form used in vaccinations. The stuff in vaccines is the stuff they embalm the dead with. ANY amount - especially in the bloodstream - is bad news.
Mercury - though many vaccines SAY they are mercury-free, they are not. They still use Thimerosal (50% mercury) in the process and then "filter it out." The problem is that the mercury bonds with the proteins in the vaccine and CANNOT BE FILTERED OUT. "Mercury-free" vaccines have been independently tested, and they have mercury in them. (See www.whale.to... )
Antifreeze
Aluminium
Borax
MSG
Ammonium Sulfate
Animal organ tissue and blood
Latex
Genetically modified yeast
Foreign DNA
This is a partial list, and the ingredients and amounts vary from vaccine to vaccine (though formaldehyde and mercury are in most).
More information here: www.vaccination.inoz.com...
I have no doubt the flu vaccine works (though is not flawless-some do get sick just from it). I just wonder if it's really necessary for healthy adults.
What do you use upon which to base your surety? Something a pharmaceutical company says?
Consider: Big Pharma makes money selling vaccines. Big Pharma makes money selling drugs to "treat" the illnesses caused by the stuff that was injected - plus makes money on further drugs to treat the side effects of drugs, ad infinitum, until you're dead.
And like I said, independent research says vaccines cause spikes in the illnesses for which a public is vaccinated shortly after the vaccination program is begun.
And I understand that there are risks involved.
Risks that may show up immediately - or may show up years later. The fact is that ALL vaccines cause damage. The degree to which damage is done - from only a small amount to completely debilitating and deadly - depends on a number of factors, including initial health, genetics, the point in one's biorhythm that the vaccines are administered, and other factors.
Besides the aforementioned sickness that can be caused by it, there are of course the chemical and mercury concerns, as the thread you linked us to seemed to cover pretty thoroughly. Can I assume you won't be getting one then? Thanks again for your input.
I will not allow my body to be pierced with a needle for all the tea in China - or gold, either. So you assume correctly.
[edit on 10/16/2008 by Amaterasu]


It's nice to know who I'll see when I read a thread.
