Trump: Bush Impeachment Would Be 'Wonderful Thing', page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times
Topic started on 16-10-2008 @ 10:57 AM by DimensionalDetective

Trump: Bush Impeachment Would Be 'Wonderful Thing'


rawstory.com
"I was surprised that she didn't do more in terms of Bush and going after Bush," Trump said in an interview with CNN's Wolf Blitzer, referring to Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

"It ... just seemed like she was going to really look to impeach Bush and get him out of office, which personally I think would have been a wonderful thing."

Trump, 62, said Bush misled the United States into waging war on Iraq, a much worse offense than a dalliance with a White House intern his predecessor Bill Clinton was impeached for in 1999."He lied. He got us into the war with lies," Trump said about Bush. "And I mean -- look at the trouble Bill Clinton got into with something that was totally unimportant. And they tried to impeach him, which was nonsense.
(visit the link for the full news article)



[edit on 16-10-2008 by DimensionalDetective]


reply posted on 16-10-2008 @ 11:32 AM by Britguy
reply to post by jtma508



You can't be serious about Richard Branson?
He's always careful to portray the "aged hippie done good" persona but beneath that he's just as much of a money grabbing, government butt kissing stooge as any other rich bugger. I'd personally like to bitch-slap that constant Tony Blair style grin right off his face.
If I was to receive the amount of taxpayers money for personal business that he receives then maybe I'd have something to smile about as well.


reply posted on 16-10-2008 @ 11:41 AM by NovusOrdoMundi
reply to post by DimensionalDetective



I agree that the illegal war is much worse than an affair. Clinton got what he deserved, but somehow Bush hasn't.

If you ask me, it all looks scripted.

They let the people believe they elected a charismatic Democrat to undo the damage caused by a Bush Republican, all the while, the main agenda continues to push forward.

'They' accomplished what they set out to accomplish in Clinton, so they let him go.

Hmmm...a charismatic Democrat replacing a Bush Republican? Where have I heard this plot before?

Then along comes Bush, who commits far worse crimes against humanity and the Constitution, yet he doesn't get what he deserves.

Did they need Bush longer than they needed Clinton? Or are we all just being sucked in to voting Obama? It seems to be working if that's the case.

Obama or McCain, it doesn't matter. It's coming no matter what. And when it does, refer to jtma508's signature...

Don't blame me, I voted for Ron Paul


reply posted on 16-10-2008 @ 12:18 PM by Marcus Calpurnius
reply to post by FlyersFan




Exactly. If Democrat were to impeach Bush, they would end up indicting themselves in how we got to war in Iraq. They know it and are content to just rewrite history and let those who are less educated on the subject to think bush lied.


reply posted on 16-10-2008 @ 03:51 PM by Marcus Calpurnius
reply to post by DimensionalDetective



Now prove to me anything Bush said or claimed that was any different from the previous 8 years. Why aren't these studies interested in what congress was saying about the war? Or how about previous to Bush being president? The fact is our country was being prepared for war in Iraq for a decade.

I'm also very skeptical about who carried out these studies you linked. Frankly I don't think I trust "A study by two nonprofit journalism organizations", after the last 8 years of journalistic integrity. You are the perfect example of what a corrupt media does to people.

[edit on 16-10-2008 by Marcus Calpurnius]


reply posted on 16-10-2008 @ 04:10 PM by DimensionalDetective
reply to post by Marcus Calpurnius




LOL, that had to be one of the lamest comebacks I've ever heard of. I get my data from EVERYWHERE, not just the lame stream media.

Although Decider and his crew's lies are EASILY documented--It doesn't take any study to determine that, all it takes is someone paying attention to REALITY.

And coming from someone who sounds like a Faux-news regurgitator, I'll equally take what you have to say with a tiny grain of salt.

Peace.


reply posted on 16-10-2008 @ 05:49 PM by Marcus Calpurnius
What lies? With so many to choose form it should be easy to come up with one. I'm actually very educated on the subject thanks to my family's and my service in the military and my interest in Iraq since I was 12.

reply to
post by DimensionalDetective



Oh, here we go. The typical left wing reaction to anyone who disagrees with them. You must watch Fox news! In retort, I'd suggest that you watch MSNBC?

If you want to debate this, I'm game. I'm prepared to school you if need be.



[edit on 16-10-2008 by Marcus Calpurnius]


reply posted on 16-10-2008 @ 06:18 PM by DimensionalDetective
reply to post by Marcus Calpurnius



None are so blind as those that refuse to see.

You already have news sources and direct VIDEO showing them lying over and over. But you can keep your blinders on and stay in your delusion denying it all you want. Thank goodness most of the planet has woken up past that point. lol


reply posted on 16-10-2008 @ 06:31 PM by Marcus Calpurnius
reply to post by DimensionalDetective



You already have news sources and direct VIDEO showing them lying over and over


You keep claiming its lies, when its clearly the same intelligence and rhetoric from the previous 8 years. So, either everyone in our government was lying, or it was a huge blunder of intelligence. Showing me a video where of all people John Stewart claims to be an authority, is nothing more than handing off the argument to someone else and a cope out. That video does not prove Bush or anyone else lied. Its a propaganda video tat leaves out any fact tat might derail the Bush is lying narrative.


I'll ask again, what lies did Bush tell?


None are so blind as those that refuse to see.


I hope someday you guys take that sentence to heart and educate yourself on the facts. They are freely available to anyone, but you choose to take the word of John Stewart and Olberman. Thats your choice, but I'm telling you, as someone who is very knowledgeable on this object, that they are full # #.



[edit on 16-10-2008 by Marcus Calpurnius]
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Fox News Drops The Ball On Its Focus Group - Ron Paul Supporters!
  Posted 14 days ago with 43 member flags
Obama Supporters...Remember This List When You Vote This Year.
  Posted 13 days ago with 35 member flags
26 Things Non-Paul Voters Are Basically Saying
  Posted 5 days ago with 27 member flags
What\'s With The Obama Love on ATS Today?
  Posted 16 days ago with 25 member flags
Obama and why he\'ll still be president...
  Posted 18 days ago with 24 member flags