It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


15 Year Old Girl Charged as Sex Offender

page: 25
<< 22  23  24   >>

log in


posted on Oct, 21 2008 @ 07:14 PM
This is totally sad! On the one side you have a child, hormones raging, desparate for attention, affection + approval. This same child has not been fortified with good moral judegement guidlines!

Her parents, have given her STUFF, not affection, praise, encouragement, sense of self worth, and a basic understanding of the urges within her own body. No one has explained the "VALUES" OF THE female persona. She does not possess the understanding of the "ramifications" + "responsiblities" of her every action.

She took a "electronic communication device" "all my friends have them and text/send pictures/ talk yada, yada, yada. No one has explained the 'RESPONSIBILITIES' of this device nor the LAWS governing it's use.
Sorry, ingnorance of the law is no excuse. Little girl your toast! You are going to made an example of to teach a lesson.

All that said, she screwed up! and now "everyone" knows for "EVER". These cute little beefcake nudies pics will follow her into her marriage, her work, her life until she dies! It will affect her hiring/job acceptablity, loans for homes/autos/ and any civic/social attachments. I use the extreme example of "Linda Lovelace"! Although, not often referred to anymore, just the name is synomous with "PORN" and deepthroat! She lives in a quite city in Alabama. But google her name and instantly she become a "hot" topic. So this also will happen to this 15 year old child.

Punishment, well let's use a sledge hammer to hit a fly!!! Ask the courts for "common sense" will not prevail. She's sinned and she's gonna pay!!! Or at least that the urge by our prestigious appointed/elected judges. They're probably jerkin off under the bench will lookin at the evidence.

Is there any cure for stupid? Stupid Parents ='s Stupid Children.

posted on Oct, 23 2008 @ 08:05 AM
No, this is insane. If a kids want to send nudy pics of themselves to other kids, get the f over it. It is the same crap as a 15 year old, having sex with a 15 year old, and making them both statutory rapists.

If the parents are so concerned about their children, perhaps they should realize that it is their job to do this sort of 'policing', It isn't healthy for our society to charge this girl, or her friends that received the photos, and it is a gross waste of resources, to prosecuting, or jailing any of them over it.

yeah, people are starving, let prosecute nudy pics, that kids sent to each other...That'll save us from our prudish stupid ways...

posted on Oct, 23 2008 @ 10:01 AM
This "kid" you all keep referring no "kid" when they start broadcasting nude photos of themselves to other "kids".

You people who keep using the word "kid" might want to revise your definition here.

On one hand you spout she is just a "kid", the next your condoning her actions as if she were not a "kid".

Here is the deal.

FCC law prohibits the transmission of pornographic material across public airwaves, including radio, tv, telecommunications, and for those who are not aware of it..the internet.

Now this "kid" absolutely was not doing "kid" things by any sort. She knew exactly what she was doing, and it wasnt playing hop scotch or tag or any other "kid" games. She was purposely taking pictures of her nude self, then sending those pictures across a public telecommunications system that is regulated by the FCC, and transmitting those images to other cell phone subscribers that also use the public telecommunications airwaves.

THAT is the crime people. The use of public telecommunications to transmit nude photography of a minor. Doesnt matter that those photos were taken by her, it matters that she used the public telecommunications system to transmit them to other phones.

Now dispite all you supporters of indecent material by minors here, those photos can easily and probaby were, hijacked and tapped, and its only a matter of time when those images will be published on some sick child porno site. And when they are, all you sick supporters can come back here and show your hind end's some more and feel really low about your position.

You want to curb activity like this and protect kids, well take a diferent stance on this particular incident then. You all wonder why there are so many 15 yr olds and younger getting raped, killed, abused and solicited on corner streets and porno websites.

Bet your hind end's if this was YOUR 15 yr old you would be hopping mad and doing anything to stop it. And you would certianly not be sitting here spouting shes just a kid.

So if any of you need a grade school refresher on FCC rules and regulations, I suggest you head on over to and look up telecommunication regulations and learn real fast.

This "kid" obviously knew what she was doing, and she also risked taking the chance that anyone could get ahold of any one of those cell phones she sent those images to and her pictures end up on the net. And when that happens, who is going to be the first to scream bloody murder that her pictures are on some sicko website eh? bet your hind end again that it would be HER doing the screaming!!! And should there be any sympathy at that point...HELL NO.

Its time to stop pampering these issues and pampering these "kids" who do such activities and its time you people who sand behind this "kid" to get out from under your cracked decency rock and find something else to support because in the mass majority of the public, this would not be viewed as an innocent act by an innocent 'kid". Now do you want to be put into that indecent catagory right along with this "kid"?

Rethink and then open your eyes and get your heads out from your hind ends before jumping off the same cliff this "kid" jumped from.


Now just imagine what kind of garbage is on this "kid's" computer too.

If it were YOUR 15 yr old girl..what woud YOU be saying about this eh?



posted on Oct, 23 2008 @ 10:12 AM

Originally posted by RFBurnsIf it were YOUR 15 yr old girl..what woud YOU be saying about this eh?

Well, I wouldn't be saying a court trial and 10-20 years as a registered sex offender was a good idea.

I would be mad as hell, and sitting her down for a nice long talk about pretty much what you just said, what people have been saying throughout this thread – that she was putting herself in danger.

Kinda like I would if I found out my 15-year-old hitchhiked, or went to after-hours clubs, or any of the other things that 15-year-olds do that could get them killed.

I'll take your word for the FCC regulations thing, although I didn't know it was illegal to send or receive porn over the internet, or cell phones for that matter. I wonder how many adults are guilty by those standards? Shall we put everyone who has ever looked at dirty movies online on a sex offenders registry? Kind of defeats the purpose of the registry, doesn't it?

Anyhoo. Yes, if it was my child I would be steamed at her. And I would be ten times more steamed at the school officials for bringing into the public and legal sphere.

As for whether or not she's a kid, I think it was said in this thread. This is not a kid behaving like an adult. This is a teen behaving like a teen.

Still not an adult.

posted on Nov, 26 2008 @ 06:47 PM
To me this is just silly. At the most this should of been a fine type thing.

All these Oh no we didn't do this in times past moral orals need to wake up and look back in your own family tree people married when they barely hit teens. My grandfather married my grandmother when she was 14 and he was 20 by today's standards he would be a sex offender. So yes, infact people were having sex way back when too.

Yes even as child I can recall a group of kids at our caretaker stripping off our clothes to go skinny dipping (aka swimming nude) should those kids be considered sex offenders by todays standards?

I see this kind of strangeness going on today where one teen is one year older and they have relations where one gets listed as being a sex offender for life for being a few months older than their partner. There was even a story where an offender in question married the same girl and in their 30's they were having major problems with DSS wanting to take their children, work related, school.

In all aspects this was minor event and should be treated as such. She would get less of a sentence if she were shoplifting!

[edit on 26/11/2008 by toochaos4u]

posted on Nov, 27 2008 @ 01:52 PM
I am more concerned about unconvicted ADULTS who salivate when a see a teenager or kid walk past them.

I think we should focus more on who THOSE people are as opposed to going after some immature girl that takes nude photos of herself and sends them to her classmates.

That in and of itself is pretty retarded but to destroy her life as an adult before she even becomes an adult by making her register as a sex offender? That's just plain stupid.

I would suggest probation and some therapy just for her own good and self worth.

Most likely, the teens that received the images showed them to someone and said, "lol, look what this moron is doing now. What an idiot."

Or something of that nature.

Seriously, does anyone consider her a threat to anybody other then herself? I doubt it. However, by now, she is certainly a candidate for suicide.

I think she has already learned plenty from this experience already. Again, probation at best just so she can be monitored for her own protection.

PS-If your an observant parent, you already know that teenagers are doing this all the time.

"Not my kid."

Okay, except for your kid.


posted on Dec, 10 2008 @ 06:36 PM
The combination of pornography and the pedophiles it produces is deadly in our society, deadly to marriages and MOST of all deadly to our children .The brutal abuse of children by pedophiles pumped up on porn is tragic, shocking and heartbreaking.
Men who view pornography portraying 18-year-old women dressed to look like young teens, often act out their prurient sexual cravings by raping "real" young teens.
Children and teens who are exposed to pornography have these images etched in their memories for the rest of their lives. These images can be triggered and can surface without warning, leaving the potential for numerous problems in future life.
Internet pornography is often the first exposure that children and teens have to sexual images. This plants in them a twisted and perverse view of human intimacy that is difficult or impossible to weed out. These early learning experiences can lead to sexual deviancy and crime, and often negatively affect their future relationships and marriages.
When a father or mother is involved with pornography, the children will suffer in some way. This can range from something as simple as a parent who is often moody, angry, or "in his or her own world," to a father or mother who commits incest. Pornography hurts husband and wife relationships and breaks up marriages, which of course seriously impacts the children in the family.
These "on-line" predators hide behind the cloak of anonymity, not unlike a shark lurking beneath the surface of the water. If the producers of pornography are sharks, then the producers of "child pornography" are the Great White Sharks-the most dark and sinister, the most deadly in all of porn's inky ocean. DEADLY, DEADLY POISON, THAT NEEDS TO BE ELIMINATED IN WHAT EVER MANNER POSSIBLE.

[edit on 10-12-2008 by Who_ME?]

posted on Dec, 10 2008 @ 09:30 PM

Originally posted by Who_ME?
Children and teens who are exposed to pornography have these images etched in their memories for the rest of their lives. These images can be triggered and can surface without warning, leaving the potential for numerous problems in future life.

Uhhh...okay then. So you joined ATS... what...1 post ago... and you suddenly errupt with such amazing passion?

Yes, many fine, well raised, balanced children from good homes suddenly turn on their home computer one day and then BAM!!! They click a link and see a pornographic image and their morality crumbles instantly!

They become a perverted shell of their former human selves waiting to be victimized (or victimize) by the first warm body they can find! Sort of like those people in strict Muslim countries that see a woman's ankle...mayhem ensues! They become beasts that cannot control their urges! The animal reigns supreme and rapes everything it can grab! But it isn't their fault, those women were flashing their socks!

Seriously was your post sarcasm? Or is your world really that messed up?

[edit on 10-12-2008 by Sonya610]

posted on Dec, 10 2008 @ 10:01 PM
reply to post by Who_ME?

What does this post have to do with a kid doing something dumb that seemed like a good idea at the time or was the result of a dare by one of her pals? She's a little girl who doesn't know the way of the world. Fine her last week's babysitting money and confiscate her cell phone for 30 days. Making an example of her will do nothing but destroy her life for no reason because other 15 year olds will know that they are different and can get away with anything.
Are there any other states with laws that victimize the children that they are supposed to protect?

posted on Jan, 16 2011 @ 11:23 PM
post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions

posted on Jan, 16 2011 @ 11:23 PM
post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions

posted on Jan, 16 2011 @ 11:23 PM
post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions

posted on Jan, 16 2011 @ 11:23 PM
post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions

posted on Jan, 16 2011 @ 11:23 PM
post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions

posted on Jan, 16 2011 @ 11:24 PM
post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions

new topics

top topics

<< 22  23  24   >>

log in