The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.
reply to post by IMAdamnALIEN
The pictures posted are known as the "Jacobs photos". A quick Internet search will reveal that the animal has pretty much been identified again as a mangy bear (yes, some still don’t agree). And for good measure:
And one of many examples:
bigfootskeptic.blogspot.com...
As for Random1's Sasquatch expedition...
Before I start - Anyone who believes in Bigfoot/Sasquatch is good in my books... (
) BUT I have to be honest and critical. From what I'm reading
here I would suggest that you sit down and think about your "expedition" before you go running off in the woods. Hiding and putting "sticky stuff"
on its back or shooting at it with a tranquilizer is NOT the way to go. Any such "expeditions" should be a purely scientific approach if you want to be taken remotely serious by anyone. Every time we see 15 guys grab their disposable cameras, after a couple of brewskies, to go on a "Bigfoot Hunt" the Cryptozoology field takes another hit in the marbles. It's Rednecks with big guns and bored teens with cams that practically brought any interest and credibility in Bigfoot to its knees in the past couple of years.
Not everything you read on the Internet is "good and true", and the fact that you can't identify the Jacobs photos or spell Sasquatch correctly tells me that you need to spend some more time on the Internet, sifting through pages and pages of fact and fiction.
BUT don't let my criticism deter you. Everyone has to "start" somewhere, and I'll be more than willing to eat my hat if you find irrefutable proof of Bigfoot during your future expedition(s).

As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.



