Originally posted by Kailassa
*snip*

So it was mccain who was the reptilian the whole time

Mod Edit.Removed deleted photo.

[edit on 16-10-2008 by GAOTU789]

I didn't watch it. I only saw one clip.

And in that clip - Obama lied.

He said that 100% of McCains ads were 'negative'.

Either Obama is out and out telling a lie, or he doesn't know his math and is therefore telling falsehoods through ignorance.

It doesn't matter ... Obama will win. We'll be stuck with him and his administration (Jimmy Carter II) for the next four years. God help us.

Originally posted by FlyersFan
I didn't watch it. I only saw one clip.

And in that clip - Obama lied.

He said that 100% of McCains ads were 'negative'.

Either Obama is out and out telling a lie, or he doesn't know his math and is therefore telling falsehoods through ignorance.

It doesn't matter ... Obama will win. We'll be stuck with him and his administration (Jimmy Carter II) for the next four years. God help us.

I dont think anyone who only watches one clip is allowed to critique. Right before that Mccain said Obamas ads were more negative than McCains... There's a lie from McCain. Get your facts together.

Originally posted by bknapple32
I dont think anyone who only watches one clip is allowed to critique.

Think again.
I definately an 'allowed' to critique the clip I saw.
And it contained a bold faced lie.

Get your facts together.

My facts are just fine.
Obama lied. He said 100% of McCains ads were 'negative'.
That is absolutely not true.




[edit on 10/16/2008 by FlyersFan]

Lies, lies, lies, all we hear are lies from both sides from both campaigns. At this point I'm thinking the best candidate would be an impartial nun or monk who has taken a vow of silence, except when negotiating for the safety of our country.

Think about it. No more self promoting speeches, no more smear campaigns, only messages of love and understanding even toward atheists and agnostics, very low chance of corruption in office, no worries about pork barrel spending, refocus on education and health care ... etc.

I'll start looking and get back with you.

Originally posted by JaxonRoberts

Having a special needs child or being related to a special needs child does not make one an expert in the field. The definition of expert is: A person with a high degree of skill in or knowledge of a certain subject. There is no evidence that Palin has such skill or knowledge. I worked with special needs adults and do not consider myself an expert by any stretch of the imagination. Is she familiar with the needs of such children, yes. Is she an expert in the field, no. There is a difference.

In some regards however, is there really more of an expert than someone who is a parent to such a child? I agree, it does not make them a Physician in the particular field, or an M.D. Certified Medical Researcher. I do however know SOME parents who are far more of an expert on their child's condition than even the doctors. I really feel it is all about how you define "expert" in general. Whereas a Doctor might know more about treatments, and particulars, a Parent might know more about the emotional and developmental aspects.

Usually Physicians learn more about illnesses or developmental disorders through the keen observations of Parents and/or Guardians. I know experienced Parents that can just look at a kid, or observe them for a moment, and they can diagnose an illness or developmental issue before a Doctor even gets involved. That is an expert of sorts, is it not?

Originally posted by bknapple32

Originally posted by Kailassa
The thread seems to be ending, so perhaps a snapshot of the end of the debate would be appropriate.


*snip*

So it was mccain who was the reptilian the whole time

That is awesome and fitting way for McCain to be seen chasing Obama with his tongue hanging out, a visual freudian slip that reflects the what is really happening this election cycle.

Mod Edit:Removed photo.



[edit on 16-10-2008 by GAOTU789]