reply to post by orangetom1999
You must not have noticed the part where you all HAVE been ganging up on him.
You see, this is what I see....
I haven't seen people here ganging up on TQS. I've seen TQS make some astonishing admissions and then post some astonishing views and people have
attempted to correct him and been rejected.
Oh, that's Ironic, because I have seen you make some astonishing admissions, and then post some astonishing views, and I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO CORRECT
YOU... and my corrections have ALSO been rejected by you.
Funny, ain't it?
He bears the responsibility and results for his driving skills so he had better man up.
Yeah, that's the problem..... He also bears the responsibility for ANY women who happens to be in his life, as if she is not capable of being Truly
It matters not to me. Disagreement is not ganging up. And this is a debate forum Agreement is not necessary here. Disagreement is allowed. We
try to not let it become vulgar or outside the TC but disagreement is not ganging up.
It is when you start telling people to "Man Up" (by taking what you say as Axiomatic Truth), as opposed to being FINE with them having their own
opinion, and saving the Petty insults for your private time.
No-one forced you to come here and attempt (poorly) shame someone into Silence.
LOL LOL LOL Edrick,
Obviously it has not worked as TQS does not know when to get out of the classroom and is still attempting to teach class to those who have been out
here in the world and among the "wildlife." And I am still on page 30.
So, you are calling TQS someone who never gets out of the house, eh?
You really don't see your Insults, do you?
You are not rescuing anyone here Edrick from their inabilities. You are handicapping them.
I'm trying to save your society.... you are rejecting my assistance, because you ALREADY KNOW EVERYTHING, merely because you are HAPPY with your
Well, so are Tyrants, and Slave masters.
Your economy will not last long at this rate.
Negative, Putting on false airs of Brauvada is reserved exclusivley for the Deceptive, Psychopathic personalities.
Nice guys are not Deceptive, their Malicious Counterparts are, and they attempt to Box these NICE guys into an isolated corner of a lack of
Ever listen to a politician speak?? How about the groups behind politicians ..their controllers???
They often portray themselves as nice and having the public interest in mind.
I'm sure that you FEEL That you had a point in that response... but you just *AGREED* with what I have been saying.
People that ARE nice, are slanted... while people who ACT nice, but DO LIE, are given the reins of society...
Honestly, Did you even think about this response?
I mean, all you did was hurt your own argument.....
Edrick..you would not make a good politician though you seem to be trying here to rescue The Quiet Storm on the public purse strings...by
getting the rest of us to allow TQS to politically default through.
Do you have a rescue complex?? You know..for the underdog..or what you perceive as the underdog??
A... "Rescue Complex"....?
What are you babbling about now?
TQS has a self imposed underdog status and seems to be unawares of this pattern. As I stated..they can choose to remain in the classroom. No
problem by me.
And you have a self imposed "I'm better than everyone" status, and seem to be unawares of this pattern.
See? I can make up Bull[snip] phrases that mean absolutely nothing also.
Really... did you put the word "Status" behind your made up word, to give it a hint of authority or something?
Like the guy on the Commercials who wears a Lab-Coat, selling you snake oil?
Hardly... you are saying that NICE guys are Psychopathic, Deceptive, and Malicious persons.
Buy we already have scientific PROOF that women PREFER deceptive, psychopathic personalities.
So, if what you are saying is true, and these NICE guys are indeed DECEPTIVE and Psychopathic, then they would be getting more action... wouldn't
You are making a quantum assumption here. The first one is that women/females go by scientific proof.
Man, your responses are getting more and more detached from reality.
We are talking about OBSERVING the behaviors of women....
Not Publishing Pamphlets, and then expecting women to FOLLOW THEIR GUIDELINES.
*DO YOU EVEN KNOW HOW SCIENCE WORKS?*
WHAT ABOUT CAUSALITY??
They go by peer group and socialization pressures.
YES, that is MY POINT!
And we KNOW THIS, because it is EVIDENT, meaning that it has been OBSERVED, meaning that this is KNOWLEDGE, and SCIENCE = KNOWLEDGE.
Wow man... I mean, just WOW.
Experience. In this case it is often by female socialization pressures which is in and of itself a long way from scientific
OH God.... How EXACTLY do you KNOW THIS?
PLEASE, enlighten me...
Which would explain why TQS has problems in their results versus scientific polling analysis.
And this sentence has absolutely no basis in reality at all.
TQS and science are pissing into the wind here. Pardon the crudity but it shows in their posts.
And this is an attack with no basis in Reality *ALSO*
I can smell your desperation.
*WHO ARE YOU CALLING A SLUG?*
I can assure you that most women can spot a male slug much faster than a male can spot a female slug. No matter how the slug is packaged. You
don't need an expensive scientific study to determine this.
Being NICE enough to treat others with kindness doesn't automatically make you deceptive.
Stop it Edrick. "Nice" also does not make one automatically pass muster...by default. Which is that to which most of the women here are stating but in
YOU DIDN'T ACTUALLY RESPOND TO WHAT I SAID.
And what do you mean by "Pass Muster"?
I see you using a lot of UNDEFINED words that have no basis in reality, as if you are afraid of having a LOGICAL POSITION that can be critiqued.
You seem to want to use Vague assumptions as argumentative points, as opposed to Logic.
So why do you attempt to destroy their confidence so much?
Incredible Edrick!! You are serious about this question???? I don't think you understand it any better than TQS!!??
Are you getting it Riley??
Are you sure you can pass muster here yourself Edrick?? LOL LOL..wait a minute..ok....you are being sarcastic here..right???
Bear with me here..it has been 12 hour nights all this week. Borderline burn out here. Nonetheless at face value your question here is
Are you going to RESPOND TO MY QUESTION, or are you going to continue to Misdirect?
Oh, ok... so what you are saying, is that anyone who is NICE, is automatically a Frail weakling with no personality, as well as a total
While Riley and I disagree on many things, I don't believe this is what she is saying at all.
Well, that is SUPER GOOD and everything, but THAT was a Reply to Namine, Not Riley....
So... try again.
(YOU need more sleep, apparently)
Frail and weakling to many women is not boring..it is unsuitable, insufficient, unable to pass muster.
So, guys who are NICE, are Frail and Weak, is that it?
And what is this "Muster" that you keep saying that they do not pass?
Are you ever going to DEFINE your words?
Or are you going to stay safely outside the realms of LOGIC?
This and boring are not the same thing.
And your presumption that NICE = Frail and Weak is also quite telling of your motivations to Attack.
While the "shopping" method and etiquette of women/females offers alot of variety in what is required...mature women know the difference..not
by scientific polling or studies but by experience and peer group communications
God, your ignorance of Scientific method, NOT TO MENTION Cause and EFFECT, is Stifling.
Are you really presuming that I think, that WOMEN READ SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS TO SEE WHAT THEY SHOULD DO?
Get your head screwed on straight man.... Get it TOGETHER!
Science STUDIES what women DO, it does not TELL THEM what they should do...
Honestly.... Did you even pay attention in School?
That's quite an underhanded attack, isn't it?
I like to think you are grown.
No, you like to think that I am a weak willed Coward who will not Call you out for your Blatant Attacks.
And I assure you, I am not that guy.
This is an example of an Indirect Attack....
I like to think you are grown.
I like to think that you have more than a single braincell in your head
I believe you can do better than this.
I believe that you can be smarter than this
I don't think it is an underhanded attack at all.
I don't think it is an underhanded attack at all.
I think it is those social standards or even non standards at work.
And that doesn't even mean anything.
It is up to us to learn them and also learn to overcome these or determine not to play or conversely play..how much a man/male will cede or
lead in playing. But either way..to be responsible for the results. Not whiny or power hungry but to Lead..always to Lead.
THEN WHY DO YOU LET THEM VOTE, IF THEY ARE CAPABLE OF NOTHING BUT FOLLOWING?
This world out here is a minefield for those not well grounded. It is up to us to learn. If you want to teach others ..no problem.
...... Then you should start learning.
But the basis on which you are won't to teach here or Rescue TQS is not a good basis.
I'm not here to Rescue Him...
I'm here to Rescue *YOU*
It may seem so to you..but I don't think TQS is very capable of learning or stepping outside the classroom.
It may seem so to you..but I don't think *YOU* are very capable of learning or stepping outside the classroom.
In this lack..mature/intuitive women will find TQS frightful and full of warning flags.
How much longer are you going to assume that you know *ONE THING* about his personality, demeanor, or Behaviors outside of this forum?
They may be doomed to remain so in the classroom while others step out into the world and take risks, rejection, and finally success in
reaching their goals in life.
You are not even Trying to listen to me.
All you are trying to do is Assert your opinion as GOSPEL.
Because as far as I can tell... you seem to use the word NICE as a General Attack against people who you would rather not see having
Wow Edrick. This is very imaginative on this thread. Even original..congratulations. Riley is not going to be able to help or desist in TQS's
relationship problem. Riley has nothing to do with it. ..nor is responsible for any of it. TQS is carrying their own water here..not you, not me nor
Riley or anyone else. Thinking people know this and can see through your tack. Astonishing.
Confidence is Essential for men to have for Successful relationships
True or False (You picked True, unless you want to be Ignorant)
So, Are these underhanded insults HELPFUL, or HARMFUL to that Confidence?
Answer YES OR NO ONLY.
No misdirection, No Distraction, No lengthy paragraphs of meaningless Filler.
YES - OR - NO.
You seem to be in the lost puppy business here. Astonishing.
You seem to be in the ignorant Ape buisiness here. Astonishing.
-Edrick (You are Boring me)
edit on 14-11-2010 by Edrick because: error correction, clarification, addition, spelling