posted on Oct, 14 2008 @ 05:00 PM
Some believers, who shall remain nameless, state that there were witnesses who saw bodies strapped to the seats of the alleged Flight AA77 after it
hit the Pentagon.
I've not yet seen a single coroners report that verifies this. If there were bodies strapped to seats, then those bodies have names - they were
people. Therefore, a coroners report should include the name of the body, how it was found, cause of death, photographs of the bodies as crime-scene
evidence, etc, all signed by a coroner.
Anyway, my question is this:
We're lead to believe that an alleged high speed crash of the alleged Flight UA93 virtually smashed the bodies on the plane into unrecognisable goo.
There were no reports of any bodies being strapped to seats at Shanksville. In fact, were there any seats allegedly found?
However, during another alleged high speed crash of the alleged Flight AA77 at the Pentagon, we're lead to believe that bodies can survive wholly
intact, still strapped to their seats.
Which is it, believers? Does the 'soft' ground of an old strip-mine swallow a plane whole, while not leaving bodies intact. Or, does the
reinforced, bunker-like walls of a building, smash the plane up while leaving some bodies intact?
Which version of high speed smashes do you expect me to believe?