Originally posted by UmbraSumus
I`ve followed along - all 18 pages - i feel for paperplanes having to constantly repeat herself every 3 pages or so ........ poor girl !.
Ah, don't I know it. I just know I've read somewhere (site rules, maybe?) that we should all bother reading the previous posts in a thread before
replying, if only to keep ourselves from looking foolish. I understand that a thread of this magnitude is daunting, but is it really too much to ask
that people read at least the few previous pages before they post?
gypsy1035, I"ll just copy/paste from my response a few pages back: "The 14 October issue was brought up earlier by another participant in this
thread. This was my response then and it still stands: 'Please do not bring the 14 October predictions into this thread. As far as I'm concerned,
this has nothing to do with Blossom Goodchild and her giant mothership. As hard as it may be to believe, some of us are quite capable of seeing
Goodchild and her predictions as silliness without rejecting every other piece of UFO evidence. I spent a fair bit of time over on the 14 October
thread, goofing around with other ATSers who also think it's a joke (I apologize for offending anyone) and spotted this footage this morning. The two
subjects have nothing to do with one another. It really is not that impossible.'"
[edit on 15/10/08 by paperplanes]