posted on Oct, 14 2008 @ 10:28 AM
I suggested this once in one of the Issue's Threads, Except, I had said 200 posts lol. 50 is much more reasonable.
I agree. During the Political Season, and Summer time, I've noticed in the short months, that the ridiculous threads with no merit, pop up quite
often. And most of the time, they are from members who have JUST joined.
A 50 post minimum would show dedication to the site, as it takes time to reach 50 posts. BUT if someone DID have urgent information to share, its not
unattainable to reach 50 posts quickly... The one liners and "what?" posts will probably increase, but perhaps, having a minimum would deter people
from starting threads which have no legs to stand on...