Class surprises lesbian teacher on wedding day , page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 09:26 PM by LiquidMirage
Originally posted by gimme_some_truth
You are so right on. I couldnt have said it better myself. TKain has really shown nothing but intolerance and ignorance here.

When I first read what Tkain said about this article I though" this perosn has to be sarcastic...right?"

Apparently though, TKain was dead serious. While things may be alot better than they used to be , This only proves that intolerance and prejudice are still alive and well.

What a shame


You know, I really love the way you liberals throw around your rubber stamp, cut and paste, bandwagon, prepackaged response of calling someone ignorant and intolerant whenever you don’t agree with somebody else who doesn’t think like you. And yet, you are too ignorant to realize that you are every bit as intolerant as what you claim others are.

Furthermore, you must also be ignorant to the fact children are impressionable and when exposed to something like this will think that it is perfectly fine and normal. But I’m sure you also think that being a [SNIP]is perfectly fine and normal. I suppose wife swapping is fine too, isn’t it?

Kids don’t need to be involved in this sort of BS! Society is going down the tubes as so as it is and here we have kids being introduced to this rubbish. They belong in school learning reading, writing, mathematics, and science, not liberalism 101. They don’t need to learn about a couple of [snip].

Mod Edit- We're a family friendly site.

Thanks,

[edit on 14-10-2008 by elevatedone]


reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 09:31 PM by round_eyed_dog
reply to post by LiquidMirage



It's sort of difficult to take any accusation of intolerance seriously, when that same person uses slurs in their argument. I was also not aware that you were assigned the job of deciding what is and what isn't moral, did I miss a memo?


reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 09:34 PM by skeptic1
reply to post by LiquidMirage





Furthermore, you must also be ignorant to the fact children are impressionable and when exposed to something like this will think that it is perfectly fine and normal. But I’m sure you also think that being a homo is perfectly fine and normal. I suppose wife swapping is fine too, isn’t it?


Yes, children are impressionable. And, I hope that exposing them to a ceremony between two people who love each other who want to commit their lives to each other will make them realize that it is perfectly fine and normal. Maybe it will get rid of some of the hatred, bigotry, and hypocrisy in the world.

Gay men and women exist. They live along side us straight people. They breathe the same air we breathe, shop in the same stores we shop in, live in the same neighborhoods we live in, have to follow the same laws we follow, and pay the same taxes we pay. Pretending they are somehow immoral and horrible and unnatural won't change anything. Teaching your kids that will only ensure yet another generation of hatred and bigotry.

I've always wanted to ask what people who see homosexuality as so unnatural and immoral will do if one of their children come to them and say they are gay? Will it still be so horrible then or will it suddenly become a bit more acceptable?

Also, quit going to the extremes with comparing homosexuality and gay marriage with wife swapping or heroin use. It is ridiculous.

[edit on 10/13/2008 by skeptic1]


reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 09:36 PM by stonespiral
reply to post by LiquidMirage



Yeah, who needs to learn even a slight amount about civil rights? That's not important part of history or anything.

You can't assume that just because a person sees homosexuality as normal that they'll find wife swapping to be normal too. These are two totally different things and it's a complete fallacy in your arguement.

and going against somebody who's against gay marriage IS intolerant, depending on the circumstances of their arguement. When their point does nothing but spout hate speech, yeah, I'm going to work against them. You have the right to state your opinion as much as anybody else, but there's no reason to be so hatefully ignorant.

I'm intolerant against ignorance, an idea, not a person. That does NOT make me just as intolerant as people who spew terrible things about two people who are perfectly happy together.



reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 09:44 PM by Amaterasu
Originally posted by LiquidMirage
You know, I really love the way you liberals throw around your rubber stamp, cut and paste, bandwagon, prepackaged response of calling someone ignorant and intolerant whenever you don’t agree with somebody else who doesn’t think like you. And yet, you are too ignorant to realize that you are every bit as intolerant as what you claim others are.


It just seems to me that others making pronouncements about who shall love whom is intolerant. Where is the intolerance in saying love whom thou wilt?

Yet here you are, calling one who would NOT dictate others' love "intolerant..."

I just don't get it.

Furthermore, you must also be ignorant to the fact children are impressionable and when exposed to something like this will think that it is perfectly fine and normal.


Oh, forsooth! We wouldn't want kids to grow up thinking love and commitment were NORMAL!

But I’m sure you also think that being a homo is perfectly fine and normal.


Define normal, please. What percentage of a population must exhibit a behavior before it's considered normal?

I suppose wife swapping is fine too, isn’t it?


I'm not into it, but I can say I am willing to TOLERATE it others, as long as all parties are willing. It's not MY business.

Kids don’t need to be involved in this sort of BS!


Of course we should shield them from love, commitment, and ceremony! Because...er... Heh. YOU tell ME why love and commitment should be kept from them, K?

Society is going down the tubes as so as it is and here we have kids being introduced to this rubbish.


Being tolerant, I will tolerate your assessment of love and commitment as being rubbish.

They belong in school learning reading, writing, mathematics, and science, not liberalism 101.


Love and commitment = liberalism 101??? Ok.

Actually, they belong where their PARENTS think they should be, and if that is to be present to add loving surprise to a special moment in a cherished teacher's life, where do you get off thinking YOU know "better?"

They don’t need to learn about a couple of *snip*.


Now that was hateful, you have to admit. What a fine emulation of...Jesus, comes to mind - NOT!

Mod Edit: Removed offensive term from quote.

[edit on 10/14/2008 by maria_stardust]


reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 09:50 PM by TheColdDragon
reply to post by TKainZero



Here, let me sum your post up.

Be AFRAID! Be TERRIFIED of the Gays and Sexual Deviancy!

Run in Stark Terror, for the end is NIGH!

This has been a public service. Thank you.


reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 10:01 PM by Lucid Lunacy
Originally posted by LiquidMirage

You know, I really love the way you liberals throw around your rubber stamp, cut and paste, bandwagon, prepackaged response of calling someone ignorant


And I love your cookie cutter mentality as well. This pre-packaged rubber stamp that says anyone that shows tolerance, believes homosexuality is not immoral, and or believes in equal civil rights for homosexuals, has to be a liberal.

and intolerant whenever you don’t agree with somebody else who doesn’t think like you. And yet, you are too ignorant to realize that you are every bit as intolerant as what you claim others are.


The way I look at it, it's not me being intolerant to one persons thoughts, because that persons thoughts are intolerant to many people. I am intolerant to this idea. I am intolerant to intolerance. I see your point, I just don't think it's a problem. It's like being intolerant to proponents of human slavery. Yeah, sure, that's intolerance technically... I think there is good and bad intolerance.

Furthermore, you must also be ignorant to the fact children are impressionable


That's true, but it's also a weak argument.

I went to a wedding when I was a kid where the bride and groom both worked in the construction industry, themed their wedding this way, even had their wedding on a family farm, and they drove off in a John Deere.

Guess what? I don't drive John Deere and I don't work on a farm. The one major thing I got out of that wedding was the idea that marriage was this big life event.

and when exposed to something like this will think that it is perfectly fine and normal.


I'd like to think people with functional hearts would see this as a good thing. A couple in love getting married. To think something could take precedence over that is beyond me...

But I’m sure you also think that being a homo is perfectly fine and normal.


Correct.

I suppose wife swapping is fine too, isn’t it?


If it is something the couple mutually wants for their relationship then sure. I grant them this freedom. To each their own.

Kids don’t need to be involved in this sort of BS!


At what age do you think people should be allowed to attend weddings then?

Society is going down the tubes


If it is, people like you are on the front end of that anchor.

as so as it is and here we have kids being introduced to this rubbish.


They would be much better off if they listened to your rubbish no doubt

They belong in school learning reading, writing, mathematics, and science, not liberalism 101.


I would love to know which school you went to that taught going to a wedding was 'liberalism'.

They don’t need to learn about a couple of *snip*.


Did you see photos of this event that none of us saw???

Try and show some friggin respect man. Let's say these newly weds showed up in the same room as you after their wedding, would you call them "muff divers"?? Is that what you would be thinking in your head? Instead of any loving caring thoughts for them? Christ man.

[edit on 13-10-2008 by Lucid Lunacy]

Mod Edit: Removed offensive term from quote.

[edit on 10/14/2008 by maria_stardust]


reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 10:37 PM by TheColdDragon
reply to post by FredT



It's because it's Adam an Eve, not Anny and Eve! If it were Adam and Steve it's just gross, but Anny and Eve sounds kind of Hot... and we Christians don't like getting warm in the knickers! It means Satan is trying to tempt you to dance the Horizontal Mambo.

Which means we should all flog ourselves so we can focus on the misery of our sinful existence, because it's better than thinking naughty thoughts.

This message brought to you by the letter Sarcasm and the number Glib.



reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 10:52 PM by grimreaper797
reply to post by skeptic1



excellent post. Calling it immoral and wrong doesn't change anything, it just singles people out and outcasts them. THAT is wrong.

For the bigots, you don't have to accept them into your life, but at least respect them, and other peoples choices. It is their kids, not yours. It is their lives, not yours. You go about your business, but if bigotry is your business, set up shop elsewhere because thats not the kind of business we want in our communities.


reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 10:56 PM by Amaterasu
Originally posted by TheColdDragon
reply to
post by FredT



It's because it's Adam an Eve, not Anny and Eve! If it were Adam and Steve it's just gross, but Anny and Eve sounds kind of Hot... and we Christians don't like getting warm in the knickers! It means Satan is trying to tempt you to dance the Horizontal Mambo.


But why do the "Christians" feel they have the right to spread hatred and dictate who others shall be permitted to love?

(And frankly, *I* think "Adam and Steve" sounds hot - I'm a woman that likes that sort of thing (much as you, as a male, like "Anny and Eve").

Which means we should all flog ourselves so we can focus on the misery of our sinful existence, because it's better than thinking naughty thoughts.


Seems they'd rather flog the gays (or muslims, or blacks, or [you get the picture]). [sigh]

This message brought to you by the letter Sarcasm and the number Glib.


Glad that was brought by sarcasm and glib! LOL! I nearly took it seriously.


reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 11:09 PM by DJMessiah
reply to post by FredT



True, Fred. The Ultra Conservatives typically follow the nuclear family, because many believe it's what the Bible promotes, and yet in the Bible, God allowed all kinds of families (one man and woman, one man with a wife and a concubine, one man with many wives and many concubines).

Polygamy is another issue that conservatives are opposed to, and yet it clearly is allowed in the Bible.

In the case of homosexuality, it is the act of sodomy that is forbidden, not the marriage of the same sexes.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



Alaska: Samantha Koenig Kidnapped last week.
  Posted 2 days ago with 111 member flags
Blue Spheres Fall from the Sky in the UK
  Posted 15 days ago with 81 member flags
The Chinese have seen the dragon in the sky !!
  Posted 2 days ago with 68 member flags
Strange Sounds in Sky Explained by Scientists
  Posted 11 days ago with 59 member flags
She Dialed 911. The Cop Who Came to Help Raped Her.
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags
Anonymous: Revealing The Arcane Legal Trick Behind ACTA
  Posted 12 days ago with 42 member flags
Anonymous reveals Haditha massacre emails | RT
  Posted 7 days ago with 33 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 17 hours ago, 122 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 13 hours ago, 67 replies
I saw a cat turn into a bag..
  The Gray Area, Posted 17 hours ago, 44 replies
ATS's Gutter-rats and the 90+ intro thread
  Rant, Posted 17 hours ago, 36 replies